Dcully wrote: » Interesting discussion here
keffiyeh wrote: » You can always trust on Richard and John to be some of the only voices worth listening to on gaming. Extremely experienced and knowledgeable guys.
Dcully wrote: » The chap with the glasses in particular is always very good and informative.
K.O.Kiki wrote: » Considering that consoles might not even have the option for ray tracing, I believe calling them "peasants" is now accurate. :pac:
keffiyeh wrote: » Jesus ****ing Christ. Is there ANY moderation on this subforum?
Genevieve Disgusting Self-improvement wrote: » A lot of the worries about poor performance addressed here,3:15. It seems a lot of people are sore about the pricing and the implied obsolescence of the card in their machine and a feeling that Nvidia are forcing an upgrade. I think and its driving some anger with short sighted enthusiasts...
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » That was a bit of a fluff piece really!
superg wrote: » They've released some performance numbershttps://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-releases-performance-metrics-and-some-info-on-dlss.html
Darch Nemesis wrote: » The RE2 remake has been announced as another RTX supported title.
Genevieve Disgusting Self-improvement wrote: » Better figures than I was expecting. 1.5x in some titles is better than the 980 to 1080 bump, I am sure the final figures will be more nuanced. DLSS looks super interesting
K.O.Kiki wrote: » Oh god, and I had trouble starting up REmake as its atmosphere was heavy enough already! Also I have to give props to Nvidia; that FE card is sexy AF
Gosh its gone quiet on the negative front since the performance figures came out
Dcully wrote: » You make it sound like we are disappointed IF those performance figures are true. They are best case scenario marketing figures , ill wait for the real figures thanks.