Green&Red wrote: » You said I use a simple system to rank players What’s the parameters of the system?
dsmythy wrote: » You're going to lose me with more technical talk. Are you talking about the specific player stats I use?
Green&Red wrote: » What’s the parameters for the rankings?
patmac wrote: » Is there any way of leaving a league, have used up my 12 spots and want to join a couple of others.
dsmythy wrote: » I find it funny hearing about people starting up pages and bigging themselves up based on a top 100k finish. I finished 3.9k last year but the idea I'm an expert now would be madness. Never mind my own site, I sometimes hover over the submit reply button here wondering if I'm just leading someone astray with my opinion on a strategy or transfer they're planning. Especially when I recognise them as someone who has done well in the game over the years. But I do ask the odd time here for opinions on my thinking so I try help out in some way for more obvious questions with what I think are clearer answers. On the other subject I didnt watch a single game myself last season and won't this time either probably. Just don't have that time. So I'm stuck to stats and what people write here who are watching the games. I use a simple system to rank players each week and use it a guide when making decisions. Will probably find out this season if last season was just a one off where the stats happened to lead to performances. Same story with season tickers for me. I look at the FFS one and it seems the handiest but I use an even simpler system for team stats which I use as a very very basic guide.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » For a fixtures ticker. I always find its best to do your own. I prefer to have my own opinion on what is a good or bad fixture.
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah. That’s mad green. Don’t understand where you’d get the enjoyment in playing FPL.
Green&Red wrote: » What four sources? I started listening to always cheating this year, it’s enjoyable as the two lads are likeable. I always liked the scout cast cause it can give you a different view to your own. Here is obviously the best source I use. I’ll exclude last year which was an abomination but the previous 6 were all inside 170k, 3 inside 10k and once inside the 1k, in all the time I haven’t watched soccer at all, literally less than 10 games over the 7 years. So I’d rely on here to give me the eye test
FutureGuy wrote: » The Scoutcast is nothing without Mark imho. I have no problem with the rest of the lads, but he was always the leader, the driver and his absence is sorely lacking. Andy is a good player and I have huge time for Az. The problem with FPL these days is that social media is full of people who have fancy sites and banners, but when you look at the advice and recommendations, many are not all that great. In some cases, it's simply being being copied. I'll name no names but a top TOP player used a term to describe a player at the start of the week when giving advice. By Friday, I heard the exact same phrase being applied to that player on 3 other FPL Twitter accounts, a website and a podcast. I've completely narrowed my attention to four specific sources of information. I don't have the bandwidth to take in more - anyways, it just clouds judgement.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » I believe that's Xg and Xa sort of stuff?
jimmii wrote: » Jonty usually covers a lot of the underlying stats. On ffs he has a popular table called goals imminent which highlights which players should have scored but haven't. Instead of looking purely at fpl points like a lot do he tends to delve a little deeper which is interesting.
Shanotheslayer wrote: » I'm never followed any of the podcasts or anything myself. I believe it just clouds so much judgement. If I think player A and then the podcast says player B I'd be very conflicted. If I choose player B I'm then fuming I didn't listen to myself. What sort of information do these guys give? A side from general bookie odds and who's on set pieces etc I wouldn't look into to much further barring OOP players. I'm playing 2 years seriously and it's a 65K finish and a 145K finish.
Green&Red wrote: » I listened to the scout cast from FFS, the quality has gone down big time. They've moved Mark away from it, I liked this. I know Andy posts here and I'd value his opinion and he seems like a sound lad. Az is another I really like, has different strategies to the rest and they are both viable and interesting. Jonty is grand, pulls it along well. My main gripe is the new lad who seems to be everywhere, used to be a journalist on plymouth argyle, absolutely painful to listen to but the real issue is he has never finished inside the top 175k. How is this lad on as a opinion? If you picked a boardsie at random they'd have a few finishes better than that, I'd 6 seasons on the trot better than that and theres no way I should be paid to give an opinion. Apparently he's a maverick cause he gives great advise but then panics and doesn't follow it himself. Painful Rant over
Green&Red wrote: » Scoutcast is normally good, they do get sucked in occasionally. This week its a lot about Miki and how you can't have Firmino but as a general rule they are not knee-jerk and tend to look at underlying stat.