mooseknunkle wrote: » Can anyone explain this to me I had Walker in my team before the start of the gameweek and Wan-Bissaka on the bench,Walker didnt play and i got 0 points for him on Sunday,i transfered him out for the next game week and Alonso in and Wan-Bissaka in the team for this week,now for gameweek 2 i received -2 for Bissaka being sent off when he wasn't even in my team at the start of the gameweek Its only 2 points but it would of brought me over 90 for that week
eoghan104 wrote: » Could someone tell me why price rises are so important? For examle I have Mane and Mendy. I will probably never sell them. So, it doesn't really make much odds to me does it?
MrMac84 wrote: » Well I took a -8 to avoid the price drops so I’ve .2 itb and team value 100.2 hopefully get back on track points wise this week
Green&Red wrote: » The problem with being 100 pts down is that not only do you have to take points hits to get ur team right but ur also chasing team value, they are picking up the price rises while you’re buying them at higher. It’s a bad time of year to have a bad run
KathleenGrant wrote: » 100 down over 36 weeks is less than 4 points a week. It's early days yet.
MrMac84 wrote: » That’s me in pretty much all my leagues and also out of the last man standing league in week 2! I’m actually pretty pissed off over it as I thought my team was very strong starting off! It’s going to be hard to get motivated now
Green&Red wrote: » Lots of leagues where people are already 100 points down, its over for them
Porthallian wrote: » I think after last night Firmino gets one last week in my team. Could do Firmino to Ings, Bilva to Mane then.
Porthallian wrote: » My front 3 of Aguero Firmino PEA are really limiting my options in Midfield. Should I look at downgrading one? Current mids are Salah Richarlison Bilva Kante (Gunnarsson).
tomwaits48 wrote: » quite the opposite for me and I obsess about FPL. from the heady heights of Top 100 last year to just outside top 750,000 now :pac:
KevIRL wrote: » My season long no transfer team at the heady heights of 18K while my regular team languishes at 133K in OR
KevIRL wrote: » Is this the first time in a few seasons where the more serious player is off to a better start than the casual?
2nd Row Donkey wrote: » That must make me a casual.
KevIRL wrote: Is this the first time in a few seasons where the more serious player is off to a better start than the casual?
wrestlemaniac wrote: I get the thinking about not captaining him against the big teams but Chelsea could have shipped 5 against Arsenal, he scored both goals in a 2-2 draw with Spurs last year and the City game will be attack versus attack. Just food for thought
The real mccoy 91 wrote: » My thinking is would I captain him against spurs Chelsea or city? No. Southampton are wedged in the middle but I will have 2 other pool players as cover for that and at 13m if I'm only gonna captain him 1 week out of 4 it's too expensive a downgrade to mane will give me better balance around the pitch
The real mccoy 91 wrote: » I'm considering going without salah for that run and upgrade around the rest of my team if I can hold onto my wildcard until gw9 and then get him back he's so highly owned that it's very doubtful he will rise
Green&Red wrote: » Thats not a bad plan either. He would want to be continuing at a goal a game to warrant holding onto for those four week, no one is fixture proof ......... ..........Well until they are fixture proof