Women who are "not maternal" having kids

Love babies and kids, don't mind the noise or caring for them either but because I've none of my own I still get to hand them back. I hope to have kids one day, but I think I'd be okay if it never happened. My twin nephews have written me love letters, so I have that seal of approval on my auntie skills anyway.

I'm probably quite maternal in that I feel protective towards all kids, even when they're being absolutely obnoxious and at their worst. I don't mind them playing noisily or running around yelling at each other, it's kinda what they're supposed to do. I've no problem with kids on planes or in restaurants and I've rarely had the inconveniences some people seem to suffer daily.

When people say they hate kids I doubt they've met every kid in the world and decided they hate them, so it's just something they say when they mean they don't like what goes with being in kids' company. What I find much worse is when people routinely refer to all kids as brats - or worse - and feel they should be locked away from society where they never have to see them, which I've seen on this forum quite a few times. It's a kind of hate speech, and it's somehow acceptable to say you hate all brats.

A long gone poster referred to a lost two year old as a little bitch a few years ago. It takes a *special* kind of person to call a lost and distressed toddler a little bitch because they were wailing for their mummy too loudly. That, to me, is what a "not maternal" person is like, someone who has no empathy for a child in distress. Luckily for the human race, it seems pretty rare in reality.

DaeryssaOne

Candie wrote: »

I've no problem with kids on planes or in restaurants and I've rarely had the inconveniences some people seem to suffer daily.

My husband was in knots laughing at me last week in a cafe when a kid at the next table was incessantly staring at me (I'm talking staring while lifting her fork to her mouth and not breaking her gaze once), I was so uncomfortable and didn't know how to handle it at all, in my defense she was a particularly creepy child!

I certainly don't hate kids (although I probably did express this sentiment when I was a teenager) and enjoy seeing my nephews and nieces but I am still very awkward around them. I don't really know how to play with them without feeling like an idiot and I do get wound up very easily by other people's children, just the noise and chaos doesn't suit me, if my friends walk in with their kids I don't automatically make a beeline for them like others would.

I have been told multiple times as part of personality tests that I have low empathy, but I would always sympathise with a lost / hurt child I think I would just be awkward about the whole thing so it's not very fair of the poster above to say if you 'hate' kids you must have no empathy.

No sometimes they're just noisy, messy annoying little sh*ts and I don't enjoy their company in the same way I wouldn't enjoy the company of grown-up noisy, messy and annoying sh*ts!

.......

DaeryssaOne wrote: »

My husband was in knots laughing at me last week in a cafe when a kid at the next table kept on staring at me, I was so uncomfortable and didn't know how to handle it at all, she was incredibly creepy in my defence!

I hate it in gym changing rooms. The gender of the child doesnt matter but I hate being stared at getting changed.

....... wrote: »

I hate it in gym changing rooms. The gender of the child doesnt matter but I hate being stared at getting changed.

Especially if they have that thousand yard stare and are picking their nose and absentmindedly eating their snots at the same time? Ahhhhhh :P

super_furry

Define 'maternal'. What's the criteria you use to decide if someone is 'maternal' or not?

denismc

Shenshen wrote: »

And we all grew out of it. Well, most of us.
I don't find it that hard to believe that people dislike the noise, mess, smell and general drain on your energy that comes with children. Some people prefer not to be around that.

I can't imagine they would mean them harm, they just don't want any interaction with them.

And to say that children are just people like adults seems to be naive at best. They're not, nor should they be, to be honest.

I never said children are like adults, I said children are people, in the same way that older people are people, they are just in a different demographic to you.
If someone came on here saying they hate old people, disabled people or people of a certain ethnicity imagine the comments.

Most men don't know how to look after children, it's just something women are better at and I say leave it to them, they enjoy doing it. I take a similar view on cleaning and general house work and cooking, women are better than men at all those things, it's part of the evolutionary process.

Taytoland wrote: »

Most men don't know how to look after children, it's just something women are better at and I say leave it to them, they enjoy doing it. I take a similar view on cleaning and general house work and cooking, women are better than men at all those things, it's part of the evolutionary process.

I'm laughing at ya, though I should be giving you a good kick, but what you say is exactly like something one of my brothers would say in all innocence and sincerity. Go on outta that.

Taytoland wrote: »

Most men don't know how to look after children, it's just something women are better at and I say leave it to them, they enjoy doing it. I take a similar view on cleaning and general house work and cooking, women are better than men at all those things, it's part of the evolutionary process.

Is that you boyfriend? :pac:

My lad thinks looking after a baby is very much the woman's job and he isn't really needed until the child gets a little older. Jaysus where did I find him at all.

Deleted User wrote: »

Taytoland wrote: »

Most men don't know how to look after children, it's just something women are better at and I say leave it to them, they enjoy doing it. I take a similar view on cleaning and general house work and cooking, women are better than men at all those things, it's part of the evolutionary process.

Is that you boyfriend? :pac:

My lad thinks looking after a baby is very much the woman's job and he isn't really needed until the child gets a little older. Jaysus where did I find him at all.

Women changing the nappy is much quicker and efficient, they know what they are doing generally. Men just want the lad to get older so they can go fishing or paint balling or playing football or if it's a girl buy lots of pink toys to keep them happy and then money when older.
Men just want to finish the work week and get the beers in for the football at the weekend.

Taytoland wrote: »

Women changing the nappy is much quicker and efficient, they know what they are doing generally. Men just want the lad to get older so they can go fishing or paint balling or playing football or if it's a girl buy lots of pink toys to keep them happy and then money when older.
Men just want to finish the work week and get the beers in for the football at the weekend.

I almost thought there for a second that you were him until you got to the beer and football bit

Taytoland wrote: »

Women changing the nappy is much quicker and efficient, they know what they are doing generally. Men just want the lad to get older so they can go fishing or paint balling or playing football or if it's a girl buy lots of pink toys to keep them happy and then money when older.
Men just want to finish the work week and get the beers in for the football at the weekend.

Is it 1975 where you live?

So, so, so many stereotypes.

.......

Malayalam wrote: »

Especially if they have that thousand yard stare and are picking their nose and absentmindedly eating their snots at the same time? Ahhhhhh :P

A (maternal) friend of mine forced her child to kiss me good bye before and he had snot dripping off and all over his upper lip.

I didnt have the heart to refuse so I allowed him to kiss me and when I drove off I stopped round the corner and vomited out the car door.

I never told her. But I think it damaged me.

....... wrote: »

A (maternal) friend of mine forced her child to kiss me good bye before and he had snot dripping off and all over his upper lip.

I didnt have the heart to refuse so I allowed him to kiss me and when I drove off I stopped round the corner and vomited out the car door.

I never told her. But I think it damaged me.

....... wrote: »

A (maternal) friend of mine forced her child to kiss me good bye before and he had snot dripping off and all over his upper lip.

I didnt have the heart to refuse so I allowed him to kiss me and when I drove off I stopped round the corner and vomited out the car door.

I never told her. But I think it damaged me.

It's only sauce!

fxotoole

Hector Bellend wrote: »

But they have kids.

Why didnt they pack rubber so to speak

Children's allowance
Working Family Payment
One Parent Family Payment

....to name but a few reasons

LirW

I am probably a maternal person, same as my partner who is quite paternal.
I simply love caring and raising my children, the older they get, the cooler it all gets in my opinion. Wouldn't wanna be without them.

That said though I hate the general mentality when it comes to anything child related, you can't do it right. That really gets to me.
I totally see why people have no interest in rearing children, it's not for everyone and that's perfectly fine. I don't like when people are judged for their decisions.
Then on the other hand I'm also annoyed by the kids-free brigade that seem to have nothing else on their mind but complaining about children and pointing out how amazing it is to not have them. It's the exact same level of annoyance that parents show that have this deep urge to tell everyone about their super-amazing sprogs. As much as you don't care about my children I don't care about your decision to stay child-free.

Also just because I have two, doesn't mean I want to have 8 more. I'm fine with two, I don't want more than them, I'm glad to see them grow up but they'll be gone at some point and if I built my life around them I'm in for a bad shock when they grow up.
Nowadays we have so many options and choices and I find that great.

My dad's mother is a horrible non-maternal lady, full blown narcissist and they had children because it was the bucket list. She resented the kid for not being and doing exactly what they planned for him, she resented it all for giving up her career that she loved. She didn't have a say back then in the 60s. The outcome of this whole clusterfcuk was quite bad and I am not particularly fond of her.

gw80

I don't know about all that maternal, paternal stuff. ( I am male) but I had my eldest son when I was young, 18 or 19 I think, it was hard having to give up some of my freedoms and lose out on things but now that he is 18 himself now the joy I get from embarrassing him in front of his friends,
Worth the wait.

I suppose you could say I am trying to mess up his time as an 18 year old like he messed up my time as an 18 year old.

suicide_circus

it's a big call to say "i know my bloodline has survived disease, war, famine, accidents, wild animals and natural disasters over hundreds of millennia and countless generations but do you know what? the line stops here with me. kids don't fit my lifestyle so I'm putting a stop to the legacy of my ancestors."
if you have brothers and sisters who have kids then it's different I suppose.

I think a good way to develop some empathy for children even if they are being rotten little fecks in the supermarket etc is to realise that up until the age of about 7 they are on a really long psychedelic trip, they have arrived at a crazy planet through no fault of their own, every experience is like an extended hallucination and some of them are having really bad trips.

LirW

Malayalam wrote: »

I think a good way to develop some empathy for children even if they are being rotten little fecks in the supermarket etc is to realise that up until the age of about 7 they are on a really long psychedelic trip, they have arrived at a crazy planet through no fault of their own, every experience is like an extended hallucination and some of them are having really bad trips.

Whenever I see a kid flipping it in public I mostly feel sorry for the parents. I know you have everyone around who's "get that kid under control" but honestly we've all been in the situation where the kid has a meltdown because the bread pack colour is suddenly red and not blue and start crying like Winnie Pooh died. You as the parent are standing next to it with a half filled basket, you need food so you don't Starve to death and now you wonder why it cries and how you can make it stop (Spoiler: for the next 5 minutes nothing on this planet will make it stop).
In that moment everyone hates you, all the people around you and the kid hates you and you probably hate yourself for putting yourself in that situation by having a quick ride a few years ago.

Agricola

I'd imagine for a lot of non maternal women, possibly career women to boot, it is a box ticking exercise. If you are out to have the model life, not having kids is always going to be a sort of black mark against you.

But something which hasn't been mentioned here very much is that kids are an insurance policy against loneliness and other hardships in old age.
An elderly neighbour of mine lost her husband suddenly when they were both in their late 60's. She's a quiet, reserved woman who has her own interests but wouldn't be one for being involved in local community stuff and both of them were teetotallers.
I keep her stocked up with firewood for the winter and she has mentioned to me how lucky she feels to have two grown children and lots of grand children who she can call on. Her sons in law do a lot of work around the place she would otherwise have to pay to get done, she has a selection of people who can take her to things and she's never alone at tough times like Christmas. Thinking about it, her life would be fairly lonely if she'd hadn't had kids. Friends are great, but you can only ask so much of them tbh.

Has to be another major reason why those not really "wired" to have kids, decide to go ahead with it.

Kids from like 3-6 months are a nightmare, only enjoyable when they develop some character and little traits. It's as good as owning a baby doll when they are just out of the womb.

Taytoland wrote: »

Kids from like 3-6 months are a nightmare, only enjoyable when they develop some character and little traits. It's as good as owning a baby doll when they are just out of the womb.

They are absolute sponges at that tiny age. In simple terms how they are parented then sets the map for later life.

Taytoland wrote: »

Kids from like 3-6 months are a nightmare, only enjoyable when they develop some character and little traits. It's as good as owning a baby doll when they are just out of the womb.

Lookit Tayto me pal, if you keep this up you are going to come back next life as a super fertile buxom lassie who gets pregnant at the mere touch of a trouser leg. You will have epic periods, apocalyptic thrush and 15 children before you know what happened to you

And your poor arse will sag to the back of your knees. Careful now.

Deleted User wrote: »

Taytoland wrote: »

Kids from like 3-6 months are a nightmare, only enjoyable when they develop some character and little traits. It's as good as owning a baby doll when they are just out of the womb.

They are absolute sponges at that tiny age. In simple terms how they are parented then sets the map for later life.

Leave the woman to do it at that age. It's too hard.