Keepaneye wrote: » Are us men that hard
bluewolf wrote: » What a gaffe
freshpopcorn wrote: » Ring the local radio station and contact the media. Tell them you are even considering changing your gender just to get a rental property.
Fr_Dougal wrote: » Identify as a house, then you’ll have somewhere to live.
Keepaneye wrote: » Excellent, I can say I'm detached without being creepy.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Go to Garda station, go to sleep in waiting room and get a mate to take pics,.....fire them up on Facebook and all media outlets Sit back and wait for a plush new pad, or gaff as you call it
Keepaneye wrote: » I am currently looking for a gaffe on Daft and nearly everyone is asking for a female only. Why is this practice not frowned upon in the age of equality? Are us men that hard to live with?
Keepaneye wrote: » I am currently looking for a gaffe on Daft and nearly everyone is asking for a female only.
seamus wrote: » Landlords are not permitted to advertise "females only". If they do turn you down based on your gender, you can take a case under the equal status act and get a free pay day. These ads are virtually always house-shares, which *are* permitted to be gender-biased (and race, age, etc), because the right to be comfortable in your own home trumps another person's right to equality. Likewise you'll often see ads that talk about "gay-friendly", etc. Transgender people often won't advertise at all and will rely on word-of-mouth to get housemates that are trans or trans-friendly. You see "females only" more often than you see "males only" because women make the case that they may feel less safe sharing with a man than a woman. Which is oldschool nonsense misandry of course. Women also (in my experience) tend to be much more puritanical about their biology and would feel "icky" about sharing a bathroom with a man while being on their period, or if they have a dose of the trots. These are outdated sexist attitudes that women need to address, but like I say, the right to feel comfortable at home trumps anyone else's equal rights.
http://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/what-happens-to-supernumbermetoo-when-a-feminist-is-the-accused/ar-BBLU28U?ocid=ientp_edu
Jayde Clean Machinist wrote: » Can you show us some sample ads, OP?
steddyeddy wrote: » Are you talking about the moral right or legal right to feel comfortable? I can't imagine either applying to tenants not feeling comfortable based on a man/woman's race. I'm at a uni in the UK and during an open day some kid's parents asked a colleague could her daughter be spared living with Asian girls/boys at the dorms. Does her comfort trump equality? I'm not attacking you just wonder how it could work in practice. Should we indulge everyone's discomfort based on their own views against women, men, jew, gentile or African?