Deleted User wrote: » https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/oldest-greek-fragment-homer-discovered-clay-tablet-180969602/ How sad would it be if the ancient stuff stopped being taught and discoveries couldn't be made? I think it's a bit much to call studying the beginnings of civilisation merely a hobby. Gender studies adds nothing to the world so I wouldn't really deem it as being singled out.
Lux23 wrote: » You have a troll account? So you can harass people?[/QUOTE] On twitter?
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » I've read de Sade, cards on table - at 17 and I wanted to shock the nuns! Very interesting though, not what you'd expect. You can't go wrong with Nietzsche in my opinion if you're seeking dark nihilism. Machiavelli's "The Prince" is a damn good read too.
Mackmatic wrote: » A troll Twitter account? Are you for real? If you are anything other than an edgy little 12 year old, then that is pretty pathetic and embarrassing.
mvl wrote: » But so many of you seem to be hooked up with the gender debate. That's going on and on ... on so many threads already.
Malayalam wrote: » I am not a fan of nihilism in the least, sorry, we will have to part ways on that subject I don't like Nietzsche, even though I delve into his works occasionally still, because they are so amusingly gloomy, and I do not like de Sade at all, at all. The point here is that these thinkers provide the foundational thinking to the divisive identity politics we see now.
Deleted User wrote: » I think it's a bit much to call studying the beginnings of civilisation merely a hobby.
Gender studies adds nothing to the world so I wouldn't really deem it as being singled out.
Deleted User wrote: » Because it is relevant and should be discussed at every opportunity. Look at the US. No, seriously. Look at the state of US universities today with the degree of paranoia about assault/harassment, or gender rights. have a browse through the dozens of articles written about incredibly simple cases but given heavy handed sentencing... All as a result of the rise of Feminism within the Universities, Academia, and university administrations. In the 80s/90s, these people were dismissed as crackpots, and it was believed they would go the same way as political groups (like Marxism, communism etc), but that didn't happen. Instead, ignoring the rise of these ideas, encouraged them to spread, and become actually welcomed in our various societies as indications for the need to change. Doesn't matter that so much of the assumptions are made under false pretenses, or that the research itself is flawed... The Gender debate needs to be encouraged so that we don't follow suit with the US and encourage this divisive paranoia about all things gender related.
Annabel Ambitious Tinsel wrote: » He mentioned a degree in medieval literature, which is very far from the "beginnings of civilization." What does reading Chaucer add to the world?
Deleted User wrote: » Because it is relevant and should be discussed at every opportunity. Look at the US. No, seriously. Look at the state of US universities today with the degree of paranoia about assault/harassment, or gender rights. have a browse through the dozens of articles written about incredibly simple cases but given heavy handed sentencing... All as a result of the rise of Feminism within the Universities, Academia, and university administrations. In the 80s/90s, these people were dismissed as crackpots, and it was believed they would go the same way as political extremist groups, but that didn't happen. Instead, ignoring the rise of these ideas, encouraged them to spread, and become actually welcomed in our various societies as indications for the need to change. Doesn't matter that so much of the assumptions are made under false pretenses, or that the research itself is flawed... The Gender debate needs to be encouraged so that we don't follow suit with the US and encourage this divisive paranoia about all things gender related.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Speaking of America:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6051917/Footballing-starlet-falsely-accused-raping-student-says-ordeal-left-broken.html Colleges in the US are now a feminist led mess.
Annabel Ambitious Tinsel wrote: » PlaneSpeeking wrote: » If you can get a job directly in the field of your degree (medicine, law, science, IT, etc etc) then you get a grant. If you want to fanny about (pun intended) doing gender based nonsense - pay for it yourself. And if you want to fanny about studying ancient archeology or Greek philosophy or modern art?
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » If you can get a job directly in the field of your degree (medicine, law, science, IT, etc etc) then you get a grant. If you want to fanny about (pun intended) doing gender based nonsense - pay for it yourself.
Annabel Ambitious Tinsel wrote: » He mentioned a degree in medieval literature, which is very far from the "beginnings of civilization."
Annabel Ambitious Tinsel wrote: » What does reading Chaucer add to the world?
mvl wrote: » But can we keep it to the Hungarian problem at least on this thread: where the prime minister that already has his "Stop Soros bill", and so now he decides to ban courses from private funded universities ?!? I would not spend time and money on such masters/phd myself.
But is this level of state intervention normal to your occidental standards ?
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » Lux23 wrote: » You have a troll account? So you can harass people?[/QUOTE] On twitter? Yea, why do you have a troll account? What's the purpose?
Deleted User wrote: » Someone mentioned ancient Greek a couple of pages ago. And anyways, it's all history that led to now. It's more about preventing the loss of something. I'm pretty jaded with the cog in the wheel stuff that the vast majority end up doing so while objectively, I know that engineering brings more value, I don't think it is so great that the classic be sidelined. Gender studies is none of these things.
Rory28 wrote: » One of the reasons stated for scrapping Gender Studies was it is not economically viable. Please tell me how a degree in Medieval Lit is economically viable?
Deleted User wrote: » It may not be economically viable but studying it might teach you that horrendous strawmen like what you just hurled at me don't work. At least have respect for the people you're arguing with. I'm not a retarded 12-year-old who is going to start defending points I never made.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » Not everyone is cut out to be an Engineer, Software Developer, Accountant or Doctor. Academically or otherwise. Jeez...this sounds like the type of bull**** I heard during the recession. "Ah, let's just turn all the unemployed Builders into Software Developers."
Rory28 wrote: » Christ on a bike.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » I guess whatever degree you did helped you formulate that reasoned response.
Rory28 wrote: » Its not a strawman and you brought emotives into it so stop with the respect nonsense. You seem to think I said that gender studies is on a level playing field with Medieval Lit. I don't but from an economic point of view they are. This is the topic of the thread not that they are comparable on their academic merit. You brought that into it.
JohnMc1 wrote: » While there is truth in that its not a good excuse to go and get a worthless degree. We need to bring back the Trade Schools [or atleast promote their existence]. Train students to become Plumbers, Electricians, HVAC technicians. While they're not glamorous job they are well paying jobs and will always be in demand.
batgoat wrote: » I have what many would call a useless degree since my profession doesn't relate to either English or history but it's very much so assisted with my career, I view things from a different perspective from most of my colleagues and that's advantageous. Something that might outwardly seem a bit pointless or useless can be highly useful if done properly and a student engages with it.
Deleted User wrote: » That it was not economically viable in Hungary. Not that it wasn't a viable job elsewhere. I'm curious to know if you have any information that actually shows he was wrong in what he stated? Or is this simply that you're right and he's wrong, because he shouldn't be banning any university courses?
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Compare that to gender studies. Say the premise is "women are always put down by men" - there will be no argument allowed to that; no spirited debate - just the commentator being denounced as a sexist pig.