Liam O wrote: » City are better now but it's from throwing money at everything for years while United were resting on their laurels. .
WinnyThePoo wrote: » Why should the club be held accountable because of what you think? Who told you we where going to sign Sandro? Twitter accounts and red tops? We came second last year. We have more or less have the same team. It's your own expectations that have got you disappointed.
Liam O wrote: » Haha how have United been passed by Liverpool? Stop that nonsense. City are better now but it's from throwing money at everything for years while United were resting on their laurels. United are the 2nd best team/squad in the league at the moment. People writing anything off before a ball has been kicked are really annoying me this season. Especially since it seems to be mainly smug Liverpool fans acting like it's their manager who has won multiple European trophies in the past.
deaddonkey15 wrote: » Great post. People judging the board and Woodward all summer based on their own expectations and what they assume Mourinho wants.
DM_7 wrote: » The transfer Tractor stalled.
Drumpot wrote: » As opposed to people presuming the owners/Woodward have no responsibility for the state of the club and that any serious issues at the club are none of their doing ?. .
bangkok wrote: » State of the club?? Ah here, probably the best run club in world football
Cantona's Collars wrote: » The club has an official tractor sponsor.
thetimeisnow wrote: » This is the team that should be playing and it should be hammering teams. We seem to have forgotten Sanchez played on the right for Barca and Udinese [font=Arial, sans-serif] Dea Gea[/font][font=Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Arial, sans-serif]Valencia-Bailly-Lindelof-Shaw[/font][font=Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Arial, sans-serif] Fred Matic Pogba[/font][font=Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Arial, sans-serif] Sanchez-Lukaku-Martial [/font]
WinnyThePoo wrote: » Well you said the club was only aiming for a top four. Now your saying the club is happy with second. Man City where light years ahead of everyone last year. I'm sorry you expect Man United to win the league every year., that just isn't realistic anymore. Lower your expectations to reality.
deaddonkey15 wrote: » I don't think anyone is presuming that. I wouldn't consider not having exciting full backs as "serious issues" either.
deaddonkey15 wrote: » Guardiola would win the league with that front six.
Drumpot wrote: » I think some people are . . And the "serious Issues" I was referring to was nothing to do with players who the club have or have not managed to get this summer. Its the issues the owners have had trying to be more involved in the running of the club for the past 5 years and how this has impacted the stature of the club. Can you tell me what the clubs transfer strategy is ? Can you tell me what the clubs long term plans are ? What was the strategy with Moyes ? What was the idea behind LVG ? Jose is a short term manager who never had a team renowned for playing entertaining football so was this a shift in strategy ? Why wasn't he good enough when he was available around the time SAF was retiring ? My issues are that I don't think the owners are fully committed to any kind of obvious long term strategy. Its like a scattergun of throwing money at players sometimes and then buying youth other times.
pjohnson wrote: » He would also demand that entire back 4 be replaced for £250m+
deaddonkey15 wrote: » Another Ctrl+C Ctrl+V post. Great.
Drumpot wrote: » I am trying to qualify my stance with relevant information. You incorrectly assumed I was referring to the signing of full backs which is not something I said at all . .Ignoring a point doesn't invalidate it because you don't like it or the way its being made.
jayo26 wrote: » Look who it is complaining about someone else's posting style brilliant.
deaddonkey15 wrote: » And you'd do well to remember that next time you paste your usual questionnaire into a post to someone, ignore their response, then post the same questionnaire the next day.
deaddonkey15 wrote: » Nothing wrong with my posting style. You'll hoover up the thanks from the usual suspects with that little jibe though so mission accomplished.
Drumpot wrote: » We are lucky that we have you to guide us on being better posters . .
bangkok wrote: » All gifs should be banned from a discussion forum imo. They add absolutely nothing to a discussion
bangkok wrote: » All gifs should be banned from a discussion forum imo. They add absolutely nothing