TitianGerm wrote: » https://twitter.com/samuelluckhurst/status/1027112775837986816?s=19 6 new signings this summer.
Adamcp898 wrote: » Maybe I'm just being curmudgeonly, but am I the only that find's it a bit tiresome seeing it copied over to here? I mean I think most people have an idea of what sources are just making stuff up and which ones occasionally get stuff right. Not to mention the fact that there isn't the same posting format here as Reddit where you'd have to click into a thread to see if it was BS or not, nor is there the same footfall here that's likely to post random news anyway.
pjohnson wrote: » Thats poor. Hopefully we get another sponsor over the line. Sponsored Shoelaces anyone?
Lord TSC wrote: » Stone continuesRe signings. United have the money. As I understand it, they don't want to be drawn into paying big transfer and agents fees for players who are no better than the ones they have.
Leroy42 wrote: » This should have been the summer that MU build on decent, but largely forgettable, season. Improved on the bad things, made changes in the squad to start to close the gap on City and hold off a strengthening Pool. But instead we have nothing of note in the transfer market, a manager clearly unhappy with the club, our top player, our marque signing, the player we want to build the team around for 10 years, clearly eyeing a transfer. Its deeply unsettling. Whether the Pogba story is true or not is not the issue. The fact that it can be accepted is the problem. When stories come out about Messi or Ronaldo, (prior to this year) it was always accepted that it was about them getting more money. But even MU supporters can accept that it is reasonable for Pogba to be thinking this way.
Giggsy11 wrote: » I think this will be Jose's last season at ManUtd.
Mitch Connor wrote: » I really thought United would go String this summer. Thought we'd bring in Sandro, Alderweireld and Fred early, and then see what could be done in attack depending on martial. But nope. Incredibly disappointing how united have let the summer go and decide the league title isn't worth it. Club ambitions nailed this summer, sponsors and top 4, goal beyond that. Remember, woody did gleefully announce sporting performance has no impact on commercial success
pjohnson wrote: » Yep. The board clearly decided this a few months ago.
Lord TSC wrote: » Yeah. Especially if Poch is having issues at Spurs. Stories will write themselves, anyways. Jornos will be thrilled.
bangkok wrote: » Do you ever consider A) the player doesnt want to join
bangkok wrote: » the club dont want to sell the player
How Soon Is Now wrote: » Following United since was kid but I get very little enjoyment out of supporting this club last few years. Even if the football was good I'd be happy but no everything is wrong everything is negative. Football itself has lost a lot of its excitement and joy it's just flash money and business now not about enjoying the actual game anymore. Ah well least I have Dublin in the gaa!
Lord TSC wrote: » Two things (since I'm usually the one to do it....) 1. I tend to just straight copy/paste things. If I'm on mobile, it's quicker and handier to just copy/paste like that. So if the title of threads has "Tier Blah" in it, I tend to just paste that in too. 2. Not everyone knows every journalist, nor the credibility of every paper. Which includes me. I know the United ones, but not a clue about others. So when I see a random guy I don't know posting Spurs news, and Spurs fans say he's Tier X, then I feel it doesn't hurt to facilitate discussion here by offering some sort of context to the quotes.
Leroy42 wrote: » What player should not want to join the biggest club in the world? WE have the fans, the stadium. CL, EPL, the money. So the question needs to be asked why they would prefer somewhere else.
Leroy42 wrote: » What player should not want to join the biggest club in the world? WE have the fans, the stadium. CL, EPL, the money. So the question needs to be asked why they would prefer somewhere else. This is very true. Nothing that we can do really. I know that when RM or Barca get told the player is not for sale they simply accept it and move on. Doesn't always work of course, but quite a lot of times it does.
Leroy42 wrote: » Yes, but the club are happy to have those expectations as it enables them to drive revenue. You can't remove one from the other.
bangkok wrote: » Do you ever consider A) the player doesnt want to join the club dont want to sell the player Its not just all black and white, we want a player so he should sign early