nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Are transexual women attractive to hetero men?

Redpatio

It's a very general question of course but think it could prompt and interesting discussion.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

P_1

Jaysis lads. All I'm saying is that if you want to label yourself that's cool, if you don't want to label yourself that's also cool. If you want to explore thats cool, if you don't want to, guess what, that's also cool.

The world is fcuked up enough without us getting ourselves bogged down in minutia. So long as you're not harming anyone with what you do then bloody well do it

_Whimsical_

P_1 wrote: »

Sure, if ye're happy living life in absolutes with everything nicely packaged into boxes without exploring the greys in between them or questioning then the more power to ye. Personally I'd find that incredibly dull and boring but everyone has their own perspective on things, it's what makes life so interesting.

Would you find that an acceptable thing for a straight person to say to a gay person?
"I'm sure if you made the effort you could fancy people of the opposite sex. I personally don't think much of your CHOICE to not do so?"

Everyone's individual choice and perspective seems to be so much more interesting and the spice of life when that perspective only undermines one side of any debate on these matters.

I fully believe some people are gay and bi and trans and whatever, and fully respect to their to choose their own way without any form of judgement, but surely we can afford straight people the same respect?

[Deleted User]

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody's asking you to explain anything a chara. Discussion forums are all about sharing perspective and opinion

You kinda called him boring ,in a roundabout way, for not exploring his sexuality!

[Deleted User]

Rennaws wrote: »

You're telling us we can't be 100% straight.

It's the same as telling someone they can't be gay.

Of course it needs to be explained to you..

Worse than that, he/she is saying everyone is at least a little bit gay.

The Bishop Basher

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody's asking you to explain anything a chara. Discussion forums are all about sharing perspective and opinion

You're telling us we can't be 100% straight.

It's the same as telling someone they can't be gay.

Of course it needs to be explained to you..

Ben D Bus

In my day a tranny was a portable radio!

lawred2

P_1 wrote: »

Sure, if ye're happy living life in absolutes with everything nicely packaged into boxes without exploring the greys in between them or questioning then the more power to ye. Personally I'd find that incredibly dull and boring but everyone has their own perspective on things, it's what makes life so interesting.

I've never felt the need nor inclination to question myself.

You might not understand that but it is what it is. Boring in your eyes. The way it is in my eyes.

P_1

JayZeus wrote: »

You can just keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better.

FFS. Where are some people getting these ideas from? I get that many are not necessarily binary when it comes to sexuality, but the vast majority of men are absolutely (meaning, absolutely, total, 100%) heterosexual, as with women.

What is it with trying to convince straight people that they have to have some kind of shared defective sexuality. I’m a straight man. I’m over 40 years on this earth. I never have had and never will have any sexual urge or interest in another male (of any original or modified physical configuration) as any type of sexual partner. Same goes for women who were not born as women. I wish such people no ill will in life, but get over yourselves, FFS.

I am absolutely normal and I’ve a pain in the hole (fnarr fnarr) with muppets suggesting I’m some sort of statistical outlier through pushing the sort of crap P_1 wrote above. Give it a rest.

Yikes who pissed in your cornflakes, noone is pushing anything. It's a discussion forum, you know, where people come to share opinions and perspective

batistuta9

One eyed Jack wrote: »

Exactly. I really don’t know how the “spectrum” stuff got legs, but it’s nonsense, at best. Heterosexual and homosexual are completely separate and distinct sexual orientations, there’s no “spectrum”.

exhibit A :pac:

professore wrote: »

Have to say as a hetero man Blaire White is disturbingly hot. There are lots of worse looking cis women out there.

P_1

Rennaws wrote: »

My sexual orientation isn't a choice.

I was just born as a male who likes women..

We really have come full circle when i'm having to explain myself and labelled boring for being 100% straight..

:rolleyes:

Nobody's asking you to explain anything a chara. Discussion forums are all about sharing perspective and opinion

[Deleted User]

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody is 100%. High 90s yes but theres no absolute on either end

You can just keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better.

FFS. Where are some people getting these ideas from? I get that many are not necessarily binary when it comes to sexuality, but the vast majority of men are absolutely (meaning, absolutely, total, 100%) heterosexual, as with women.

What is it with trying to convince straight people that they have to have some kind of shared defective sexuality. I’m a straight man. I’m over 40 years on this earth. I never have had and never will have any sexual urge or interest in another male (of any original or modified physical configuration) as any type of sexual partner. Same goes for women who were not born as women. I wish such people no ill will in life, but get over yourselves, FFS.

I am absolutely normal and I’ve a pain in the hole (fnarr fnarr) with muppets suggesting I’m some sort of statistical outlier through pushing the sort of crap P_1 wrote above. Give it a rest.

The Bishop Basher

P_1 wrote: »

Sure, if ye're happy living life in absolutes with everything nicely packaged into boxes without exploring the greys in between them or questioning then the more power to ye. Personally I'd find that incredibly dull and boring but everyone has their own perspective on things, it's what makes life so interesting.

My sexual orientation isn't a choice.

I was just born as a male who likes women..

We really have come full circle when i'm having to explain myself and labelled boring for being 100% straight..

:rolleyes:

P_1

Rennaws wrote: »

That's bull****. Stop putting your experience on everyone else.

Dravokivich wrote: »

No it isnt. Its why we have black and white.

lawred2 wrote: »

Sorry what?

Sure, if ye're happy living life in absolutes with everything nicely packaged into boxes without exploring the greys in between them or questioning then the more power to ye. Personally I'd find that incredibly dull and boring but everyone has their own perspective on things, it's what makes life so interesting.

lawred2

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody is 100%. High 90s yes but theres no absolute on either end

Sorry what?

Dravokivich

P_1 wrote: »

No but viewing things as absolute black and white issues is a nonsense. There's always a nuance and a grey area in between. The majority of people (gay and straight) would lean strongly towards one side or another but its an absurdity to assume there's no nuance whatsoever.

No it isnt. Its why we have black and white.

The Bishop Basher

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody is 100%. High 90s yes but theres no absolute on either end

That's bull****. Stop putting your experience on everyone else.

P_1

Dravokivich wrote: »

What are you talking about? That just sounds like nonsense. Are you going to tell gay people they aren't gay now as well?

No but viewing things as absolute black and white issues is a nonsense. There's always a nuance and a grey area in between. The majority of people (gay and straight) would lean strongly towards one side or another but its an absurdity to assume there's no nuance whatsoever.

One eyed Jack

Dravokivich wrote: »

Eh... im 100% hetro. Only been with women. Only thought about being with women.

Exactly. I really don’t know how the “spectrum” stuff got legs, but it’s nonsense, at best. Heterosexual and homosexual are completely separate and distinct sexual orientations, there’s no “spectrum”.

Dravokivich

P_1 wrote: »

Nobody is 100%. High 90s yes but theres no absolute on either end

What are you talking about? That just sounds like nonsense. Are you going to tell gay people they aren't gay now as well?

P_1

Dravokivich wrote: »

Eh... im 100% hetro. Only been with women. Only thought about being with women.

Nobody is 100%. High 90s yes but theres no absolute on either end

Dravokivich

P_1 wrote: »

It depends on the individual really. Like nobody is 100% hetro or homo, everyone occupies some position on the spectrum.

Eh... im 100% hetro. Only been with women. Only thought about being with women.

eviltwin

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i would say no. surely the definition of a hetro male is attraction to hetero women? transexual women are not hetero women

Interesting. So by that criteria my husband is not a straight man because I'm not straight.

pickarooney

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i would say no. surely the definition of a hetro male is attraction to hetero women? transexual women are not hetero women

So if I fancy a woman and it turns out she's gay that makes me gay too?

Dafuq they teach y'all?

P_1

It depends on the individual really. Like nobody is 100% hetro or homo, everyone occupies some position on the spectrum.

Redpatio

B.A._Baracus wrote: »

The way I see it is...

If some bloke gets turned on by a tranny. Then that's fine. If some bloke gets turned off by a tranny. Then that's also fine. If some tranny gets turned on by straight men too. Hey, guess what? that's also fine.
In any case I couldn't give a toss and neither should you. That's generally a tip for life. Not caring what others choose to do.

Looks like you're projecting, nobody said it wasn't fine.

Mellor

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i would say no. surely the definition of a hetro male is attraction to hetero women? transexual women are not hetero women

Well technically, Hetro- means "other" or "different". So heterosexual actually meant attracted to people with a different sex to your own. These new "sexes" are kinda making hetro-, homo-, bi- a little obsolete.

Realistically this topic is beyond the comprehension of AF. Considering people can't tell the difference between transvestites and transsexuals.

Annasopra

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

what's "the outing in September"?
I assume the Hydro is some club somewhere?

Lisdoonvarna!

https://www.theouting.ie/

Cookie_Monster

nthclare wrote: »

Ask all the straight married guys who wander up to the hydro during the outing in September ?

what's "the outing in September"?
I assume the Hydro is some club somewhere?

Yer Da sells Avon

Irish Guitarist wrote: »

The most surprising thing about that story was that in real life she's a woman and always had been.

Even more surprisingly, considering it wasn't that long ago (1998), the character was originally written as an un-PC joke, and was only supposed to be in it for a few episodes. Roy Cropper would go on a series of disastrous dates, one of which was with a pre-op transsexual who used to be called Harold.

Stigura

professore wrote: »

Have to say as a hetero man Blaire White is disturbingly hot. There are lots of worse looking cis women out there.

That's the one I mentioned! 'I Can't Believe It's Not Brudda!'