nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Roseanne fired but Sarah Jeong hired?

splashuum

I find it incredible that main stream media can pick and choose who and what they define as racist.
Sarah Jeong has just been hired by the New York Times despite her clear hatred against white people. What is even more astounding is that the NYT have doubled down on Jeong after seeing her tweets. They have now publicly declared a vote of confidence in her.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

DONTMATTER

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alt-right

Sounds like your wrong.

Hopefully they're just internet weirdos on that page.

WinnyThePoo

professore wrote: »

Alt right is a totally made up term to make the American right sound worse. It didn't exist before 2016 and guess what... it still doesn't exist.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alt-right

Sounds like your wrong.

professore

suicide_circus wrote: »

no, it's about a white male american jury who overcome their actually racist 1950s worldview to return a not guilty verdict for a black man accused of murder. it has more righteousness, pathos and humanity than all the world's sjw twitter mob could muster in a hundred lifetimes. it is a work of real consequence, unlike anything the subject of this thread could ever produce.

I hear they are remaking it with an all female cast and the defendant is a young white man and they find him guilty after 5 minutes deliberation.

suicide_circus

professore wrote: »

Ben Shapiro hate filled racist? Huh? He's right wing in his views but hate filled racist? Sorry, that's crazy.

yep, I'd challenge anyone to come up with a scrap of evidence that Shapiro is a racist.

professore

The fact the NYT hired a Harvard Law graduate as a technology editor says it all really. The same law graduate who said malware was a form of speech and spam was obstructing elections. FFS. Whatever about her racism she is clearly incompetent to be a technology editor. Maybe they should have hired someone who actually knows something about technology?

DONTMATTER

suicide_circus wrote: »

no, it's about a white male american jury who overcome their actually racist 1950s worldview to return a not guilty verdict for a black man accused of murder. it has more righteousness, pathos and humanity than all the world's sjw twitter mob could muster in a hundred lifetimes. it is a work of real consequence, unlike anything the subject of this thread could ever produce.

Like I earlier advised, try to avoid twitter and this whole celeb nonsense. You'll be much happier then.

professore

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Don't be.

On Trump:

On Richard Spencer:

On Ben Shapiro:

Ben Shapiro hate filled racist? Huh? He's right wing in his views but hate filled racist? Sorry, that's crazy.

suicide_circus

DONTMATTER wrote: »

Do they get offended at everything and start crying about the nasty women out to get them?

no, it's about a white male american jury who overcome their actually racist 1950s worldview to return a not guilty verdict for a black man accused of murder. it has more righteousness, pathos and humanity than all the world's sjw twitter mob could muster in a hundred lifetimes. it is a work of real consequence, unlike anything the subject of this thread could ever produce.

professore

On free speech... I'm strongly in favour of it. For everyone. Not just for people I agree with.

I watch with interest on here posters who put forward a viewpoint and when questioned it's either attacking the person asking the question or radio silence. For them it's not a viewpoint it's ideological dogma.

professore

Alt right is a totally made up term to make the American right sound worse. It didn't exist before 2016 and guess what... it still doesn't exist.

Outlaw Pete

Brian? wrote: »

I’m actually disgusted by this accusation or hypocrisy and how many people thanked it.

Don't be.

On Trump:

Brian? wrote: »

He's a bigot because he's a racist, misogynist and xenophobic.

On Richard Spencer:

Brian? wrote: »

Punching people is wrong. Seeing a neo nazi punched, hilarious.

On Ben Shapiro:

Brian? wrote: »

....that doesn’t actually matter to me, it’s how he uses his freedom of expression I have an issue with. He fans the flames of hatred. He doesn’t even bother with racist dog whistles.

To me, he’s a hate filled, pig ignorant demagogue.

DONTMATTER

suicide_circus wrote: »

you should watch 12 angry men, you'll be in stitches

Do they get offended at everything and start crying about the nasty women out to get them?

Malayalam

Keepaneye wrote: »

I was merely pointing out the usual hypocrisy spouted by people like you when they have very little to say despite their long lengthy posting style. You were only too happy to call me "alt-right".

I didn't actually call anyone on here alt right - it was an observation I made as a result of googling articles that deal with the story. I saw some of the usual bottom feeders like Paul Joseph Watson et al, and I also saw msm refer to "conservatives" objecting to Jeongs tweets.

Sorry I don't do short or mono-syllabic, you will have to skim read or put me on ignore:)

Will I Am Not

DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »

Turns out she's not a fan of the police either
https://twitter.com/majorlagg1/status/1025482182649892865

It’s just satire, you know, like Tommy Robinson.

suicide_circus

DONTMATTER wrote: »

Honestly? To laugh at the angry men.

you should watch 12 angry men, you'll be in stitches

TomSweeney

2 Scoops wrote: »

Pretty long troll, years even. Click the tweet, scroll down and see for yourself.

https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1025437806775226368

What a disgusting vile racist c*nt she is, and the NYT doubling down!
Disgusting, hope the NYT loses subs over this.

DONTMATTER

DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »

Turns out she's not a fan of the police either
https://twitter.com/majorlagg1/status/1025482182649892865

That's funny stuff. She's clearly hilarious. They're just jokes, are they not allowed anymore? It's pc gone mad!!

DONTMATTER

SnazzyPig wrote: »

Thanks for your paternalistic, condescending advice.

Why are you here?

Honestly? To laugh at the angry men.

Mod-Banned

DickSwiveller Returns

Turns out she's not a fan of the police either
https://twitter.com/majorlagg1/status/1025482182649892865

SnazzyPig

DONTMATTER wrote: »

I've got some advice. Stay off twitter, avoid the celeb world, it makes no difference to your lives. Getting worked up over stuff like this is pretty pathetic.
You're just going out of your way to become offended.

Thanks for your paternalistic, condescending advice.

Why are you here?

jmayo

20Cent wrote: »

What happened to freedom of speech, it's only a joke etc .....

So please tell us which of the following below you find funny?

I am substituting other groups in place of the ones this so called journalist/commentator used in her original tweet of 28 Nov 2014.

DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »

Just imagine it was a right winger who wrote those tweets, substituting 'black' instead of 'white'. I'm sure you would be pondering the nuance of said tweets. The level of hypocrisy here is off the wall.

I would like to know how come some people can find the first ones very offensive, but the last one seems to be satire or somehow acceptable?

Dumbass f**king black people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pi**ing on fire hydrants.

Dumbass f**king asian people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pi**ing on fire hydrants.

Dumbass f**king yellow people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pi**ing on fire hydrants.

Dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pi**ing on fire hydrants.

Maybe it is me being somewhat old fashioned, oh and an old white guy, but I find all of them uncalled for, equally disparaging and yes offensive.

Keepaneye

DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »

These have been some of your replies:

"I’d like to hear more. That’s all I’m saying. The video is clearly edited to make her look bad. If she is what you say she is, a racist man hater, why the poorly edited video? It strips the statement of any context or nuance"

"They are a poor attempt at humour"

"I thought it was a reference to outraged white people. I could be entirely wrong though"

You seem to be going to great lengths to excuse her of blatant racism, but if the shoe was on the other foot I think it's extremely unlikely that you would be coming to their defence, stressing the importance of context etc. Have you read all her racist tweets?

Just imagine if Jordan Peterson said it, poor auld Brian would have a stroke.

DickSwiveller Returns

Brian? wrote: »

I’m actually disgusted by this accusation or hypocrisy and how many people thanked it.

Find me one example of a post where I call someone out for a tweet or a sequence of tweets. If I was constantly jumping all over right wing twitterers I’d be a hypocrite. Find me one example of actually hypocrisy or apologise.

These have been some of your replies:

"I’d like to hear more. That’s all I’m saying. The video is clearly edited to make her look bad. If she is what you say she is, a racist man hater, why the poorly edited video? It strips the statement of any context or nuance"

"They are a poor attempt at humour"

"I thought it was a reference to outraged white people. I could be entirely wrong though"

You seem to be going to great lengths to excuse her of blatant racism, but if the shoe was on the other foot I think it's extremely unlikely that you would be coming to their defence, stressing the importance of context etc. Have you read all her racist tweets?

Keepaneye

Malayalam wrote: »

Hahah Well, Keepaneye, that's the first time I've ever in my life been called a feminazi...it's a kind of special moment for me. *wipes tear

I was merely pointing out the usual hypocrisy spouted by people like you when they have very little to say despite their long lengthy posting style. You were only too happy to call me "alt-right".

py2006

Reminds me of the brand of feminists we have today who fully believe that women simply CANNOT be sexist towards a man. It doesn't happen. They will even use a term like "reverse sexism" which makes absolutely no sense at all.

Mutant z

Hating white people is regarded as being cool these days she ticks all the right boxes.

py2006

To put it simply, if she were a white male...

DONTMATTER

I've got some advice. Stay off twitter, avoid the celeb world, it makes no difference to your lives. Getting worked up over stuff like this is pretty pathetic.
You're just going out of your way to become offended.

Malayalam

Keepaneye wrote: »

Compared to the feminazi, cuck, social justice warriors?

See I can throw out terms that describe your style of posting as well.

Hahah

Well, Keepaneye, that's the first time I've ever in my life been called a feminazi...it's a kind of special moment for me. *wipes tear

Call Me Jimmy

And we also agree twitter bans for trolling are never acceptable.