Lahvlann: Up the reek without a coddle - 26/07 two 18 so to speak

ah lads hard read sick stuff

woejus

https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/circuit-court/child-pornography-viewed-by-dubliner-showed-rape-and-torture-of-18-month-old-1.3484650?mode=amp

https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/circuit-court/child-pornography-viewed-by-dubliner-showed-rape-and-torture-of-18-month-old-1.3484650?mode=amp

I'm getting tinnitus from the Y'Know's

BettePorter

Poor woman. You have to feel for her. Bad enough if your child gets into trouble ....you can blame the crowd he's with or his circumstances. But jesus to find out your child gets his kicks from watching babies being abused ...how do u reconcile that. He still has it in him....He always will. For the rest of your days you couldn't trust him with a child. And he's still your son.

He
He
He
He
He
Him
He
Him

depression ???

yeah sure .....

2smiggy

zell12 wrote: »

Has he made friends in prison?

friends with Dr Sam I think

Murdoc90

woejus wrote: »

y'know x 10 million
you know x 500,000

cannot unhear.

Has he made friends in prison?

glenfieldman

You know
You know
You know
You know
You know

YES WE F**king KNOW

woejus

y'know x 10 million
you know x 500,000

HeidiHeidi wrote: »

Thought she said he was 19?

Not that it makes much of a difference but might as well keep things accurate....

Started at 16, but just hearing it now, im losing all sympathy.
Very young kids it seems, no excuse

BarryD2

TomSweeney wrote: »

Im just wondering was he unlucky as maybe he was 16, so normal for him to be interested in 14/15 year old girls - which is technically child p0rn, but for a 16 year old it's not !!
Now I missed the beginning of the conv. maybe she mentioned they were younger.

Not condoning this btw

I wouldn't be equating the actions of a 16 yr old with say a 36 yr old. World of a difference.

TomSweeney wrote: »

Im just wondering was he unlucky as maybe he was 16, so normal for him to be interested in 14/15 year old girls - which is technically child p0rn, but for a 16 year old it's not !!
Now I missed the beginning of the conv. maybe she mentioned they were younger.

Not condoning this btw

OK , scrap that.

Shocking stuff alltogether

HeidiHeidi

TomSweeney wrote: »

16 year old looking at child porn ?
Seems unusual ...

Thought she said he was 19?

Not that it makes much of a difference but might as well keep things accurate....

no mention of de fadder

Ally Dick

Oops69 wrote: »

Paedophilia isn’t an illness it’s a personal choice to do something evil and unacceptable to society .

Its a sexual preference. They can't be cured of it really. They need to be chemically castrated

Im just wondering was he unlucky as maybe he was 16, so normal for him to be interested in 14/15 year old girls - which is technically child p0rn, but for a 16 year old it's not !!
Now I missed the beginning of the conv. maybe she mentioned they were younger.

Not condoning this btw

Beechwoodspark

ButtersSuki wrote: »

He duz de buke review on Pat Kenny too...with noted literary critics Katherine Lynch and Mary O'Rourke.

Just on this I have heard that book review segment and it is woeful.

I get the impression that more often than not BK and KL have just read the blurb on the back cover while waiting for their coffee before going on air.

Oops69

That’s why paedophiles are in a prison and not in a mental hospital .

de burds.ie is going gaga so to speak

Ally Dick

Paedophilia today and Unfunny Friday tomorrow. Not impressed