Deleted User wrote: » As others have mentioned, in most cases this is not an issue. However, where it is, what we are starting to see are ground swells of locals pushing for safer cycling infrastructure even in small country towns and villages to allow safe and easy access
whisky_galore wrote: » The irony about many greenways is that people will need to bring bikes in their cars to get to them. Very green alright!
Muckyboots wrote: » The beauty of the Athenry to Claremorris option - Trains arriving and departing at each end of the route. Bikes on trains.
Corca Baiscinn wrote: » That's very much a factor especially because of the hopeless bike carriage on offer by irish Rail. It means you can do a longer length of a Greenway rather than doubling back. Mayo offers a return service too afaik but only if you're hiring a bike. Does Waterford offer it even with your own? We tried to no avail to find bike hire on the Royal Canal Greenway spur from Longford a while ago so had to settle for a drop off and pick up with our own bikes and driver missing the cycle. So many stations on that route, Mullingar, Longford (spur) Maynooth but such limited access by train!
AndrewJRenko wrote: » The availability of the shuttle bus was a key factor for us in choosing the Waterford one.
BarryD2 wrote: » It is but from what I saw, the Waterford one looked even busier. Closer to large centres of population too, so that makes a difference. I reckon some of these greenways will be attractive and well used whilst others will see occasional use.
Muahahaha wrote: » Achill Westport greenway is definitely very successful and the blueprint for other county councils to follow.
Muahahaha wrote: » Yeah the Kerry farmer that RTE interviewed said he has 180 acres and that the greenway would split his land in two. Which is a bit mad considering farmers themselves split their land into several parcels using fences to keep animals grazing in specific places. Theres also thousands of farmers who had their land properly split in two for the motorways to be built and they just use the overpass bridges and get on with it. Anyway the IFA are claiming that Kerry CC did not consult landowners. Which is a blatant lie because the public consultation was held in August 2017 and the documents and maps for the greenway are on the KCC website here http://docstore.kerrycoco.ie/KCCWebsite/roads/schemes/skerry/map1.pdf
nuac wrote: » The first and most successful Greenway is Westport/Achill. Work on that started 2010. The County Council appointed a dynamic duo Anna Connor Walking Officer and Padgraig Philbin Senior Executive Engineer. They met and worked with about 170 landowners and local development organisations along the route. They explained the economic and social advantages to the area of a Greenway. They negotiated agreements for permissive access. No mention of a CPO anywhere. Community buy-in instead.
RikkFlair wrote: » Saw that, had the usual "this will cut my land in 2" complaint that seems to get trotted out all the time. I'm sure there will be well designed farm crossings included, it's a greenway not the Berlin wall!
riddlinrussell wrote: » Really comes down to how well they get promoted, the Waterford one has a great team pushing it. Probably not as much for the Carrick-on-Suir one. I wouldn't even have been aware of it being completed yet if someone in work, and yourself, hadn't said to me. There will certainly be areas that are a greater tourist draw than others, but the Netherlands manages a fair amount of cycle tourism purely based on the quality of the routes and its flat as a pancake, so theres some chance in the midlands, especially if they can link in plenty of points of interest.
BarryD2 wrote: » Was on the Waterford greenway recently between Dungarvan and Kilmac. It was a nice day at end of July and was in continuous use. Young, old, families, teenagers, tourists. Also see a new greenway all the way along the Suir towpath from Clonmel to Carrick, not as heavily used. Don't think it's promoted much. There will come a time when there are a good number of these and whilst locally used, I don't think we'll see the same numbers flocking to them?
whisky_galore wrote: » People resent being told what to do by their 'betters', and will resist. Going in with all guns blazing will set back projects for years, or cause them to be abandoned altogether. FWIW: the difference between the Fenit branch and South Kerry is that the South Kerry was officially abandoned and land sold back to landowners by CIE, the Fenit landowners are attempting to squat on land that isn't theirs as it was never formally abandoned. I may be corrected on this but read somewhere CIE transferred their ownership of the Fenit branch to Kerry CC recently? As for 'safeguarding', I very much doubt that rail will return to any converted routes, whether it makes economic sense or not as the govt/Irish Rail are anything but pro-rail and Irish people in general are too fond of their cars.
Tigerandahalf wrote: » What greenway is this? What is the story with the Great Southern Trail on the section into Listowel?
nuac wrote: » I don't think "Gung-CPOs" are the best way to develope viable greenways. Land owners resent the compulsion. Understandable when you recall Land War history.
Carawaystick wrote: » The tender doc in Carlingford says The objective of the scheme is the construction of approximately 10 km of new Cross Border Greenway, in accordance with prevailing cycling standards (Rural Cycleway design (Offline) DN-GEO-03047 April 2017). The proposed route is along the Old Dundalk, Newry & Greenore rail line, where this route is practical. The rail line closed in 1951 and is currently densely overgrown with vegetation.
The objective of the scheme is the construction of approximately 10 km of new Cross Border Greenway, in accordance with prevailing cycling standards (Rural Cycleway design (Offline) DN-GEO-03047 April 2017). The proposed route is along the Old Dundalk, Newry & Greenore rail line, where this route is practical. The rail line closed in 1951 and is currently densely overgrown with vegetation.
marno21 wrote: » The whole purpose of these greenways is to preserve quality railway alignments for future use when they become viable again. We'll thank the greenway co-operatives when we see trains running Dungarvan-Waterford, Westport-Achill, Tralee-Fenit, Tralee-Limerick etc.
veryangryman wrote: » Honestly i hope they go with the original route. CPO's for national infrastructure need to be more gung-ho. Give the farmer(s) some reasonable compensation and build it.
Muahahaha wrote: » There was a short report by Plastic Sheeting on the RTE 6.1 about the Kerry Greenway. Crux of it was the IFA protesting outside Kerry County Council offices saying the 180 farmers support the greenway but are against CPOs. They were complaining that they have not been consulted which I find hard to believe as KCC say they did engage in talks but agreement could not be reached so they are now proceeding to CPO. Anyway the current state of play is a planning application is going into ABP in the coming weeks.
Muahahaha wrote: » During the report they had a camera drone filming part of the proposed 32km greenway route. Its an old railway line which has a superb viaduct on its route. The scenery along the route was absolutely stunning, if/when this goes ahead it will be a jewel in Kerry tourism.