HeidiHeidi wrote: » Now, I'll admit that I'm far from the most photogenic person to ever stand in front of a camera - but jaysus, the face on that :eek: :eek:
HeidiHeidi wrote: » After hearing (some/most) of today's show, I'm actually inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. I think he's just bored stupid and/or mortified with the usual Lahvline fare that he winds up with, but when he got a subject that was a step above singing priests / Mary's cat in Clontaaaarf / tales of Aunt Agatha's cancer, he proved himself willing and more than able.
Deleted User wrote: » Up the Reek without a coddle...https://twitter.com/joeliveline/status/1023595583649579010
ButtersSuki wrote: » I didn't hear the show but from reading the posts I'm glad I didn't. I won't be listening back to hear excuses about paedophilia and "top tips for goo-gulling kiddie porn" thank you very much......
ButtersSuki wrote: » FYP.
sligojoek wrote: » Was anyone listening to Drivetime this evening? They were playing old clips about broadband promises during the years. There was one of Philip in the early noughties where his voice sounded completely different than it is now. They must be putting him through a synthesizer these to make his voice sound deeper more boring
ButtersSuki wrote: » I assume it's so that foreign media would know who he was. And we kind of do have a pm: from the constitution - "The head of the Government, or Prime Minister, shall be called, and is in this Constitution referred to as, the Taoiseach. ... The Tiste shall act for all purposes in the place of the Taoiseach if the Taoiseach should die, or become permanently incapacitated, until a new Taoiseach shall have been appointed. The Tiste shall also act for or in the place of the Taoiseach during the temporary absence of the Taoiseach."
HeidiHeidi wrote: » I dipped in and out of the show today, and despite the subject matter (which some thought inappropriate and I can see why), thought it was great to hear a difficult subject being discussed in a mature, rational manner without any of Joe's faux pas / rabble-rousing / prejudices / hysteria. That IMO is what Liveline should be for. I thought the two women who were victims of child abuse themselves made for powerful voices, saying "why not ask us? listen to us" (and mercifully not being prodded for the gory details / reduced to tears). PBH was the perfect host on the day.
Dan Jaman wrote: » Looks like it. I hanker for the days of de Palmerians and Mary's cat in Clontarf.
Del.Monte wrote: » or a business to push over a cliff.
honeybear wrote: » I’d love round 2 of the singing priest
2smiggy wrote: » I prefer the utter nonsense !!
TomSweeney wrote: » Da tree twins are lookin' luvely!
Dan Jaman wrote: » I've no wish to share in your paranoia, thanks all the same.
thecretinhop wrote: » its been pushed heavily in many areas i can give you examples if you want
zell12 wrote: »
2smiggy wrote: » Just out of interest , what would be a full pension or a reduced pension ?
goose2005 wrote: » you need 35 years' service to get a full pension, so retiring at 50 would get a reduced pension.
meep wrote: » Perhaps soapbox Joe could voice the audio tour, so to speak. It would be in keeping with the depressing, torture-laden themes.
2smiggy wrote: » a teacher retired at 50 ? some gig
ButtersSuki wrote: » As for the Deputy Prime Minister title; it simply doesn't exist and is inherently disrespectful and some would say offensive to the office to change the name to appear more West Brit or whatever the hell his objective was in applying such a monicker to himself and the office. It was a very ill-judged thing to do. We don't have a Prime Minister so how can we have a Deputy PM? We have a Head of Government. Has any Irish Tiste ever referred to themselves as "Deputy Prime Minister" ever before? I sincerely doubt it, but I'm pretty sure if they were they were criticised for doing so.
goose2005 wrote: » now you're talking! We also for reasons of political balance have to depict torture by the Black and Tans and IRA and UVF and Essex regiment, pitch-capping,