DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » Has some form of collective insanity descended on some people here? It is awful, awful dross and shouldn't be classed as music. Call it Noise if you're going to call it something.
riffmongous wrote: » What do you listen to yourself then?
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » I listen to lots of different genres - Classical, folk, Oasis, Metallica, Radiohead etc. etc. And I play the guitar and sing myself so I like to think I have some knowledge of music. Ah but sure each to their own. If people enjoy it so be it. We won't fall out over it.
riffmongous wrote: » But sure loads of people have complained about all the above at some stage (not me though, i listen to those myself, except oasis who Id consider bland 90s pop )
briany wrote: » OK, so. I'll just add the Rubberbandits to my list of music that people have slated at one time or another. *Inspects list* Hmm, I appear to have every conceivable form of music, here.
Deleted User wrote: » This is at least the second time this thread has descended into "well what do you listen to.." Odd..
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » I'm not sure what your point is. Should we never discuss the merits of an artist?
briany wrote: » Point is that everyone's got an opinion when it comes to music, and that's natural enough. But once you start transferring that opinion to objective statements, discussions quickly go off the rails, especially when the opening posits that fans of a certain type of music are not right in the head, or that it's dross. Just what I've found.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » No, it's even worse than I thought. It's probably the most awful thing I've ever heard. Sure isn't
Brian? wrote: » It’s definitely far superior to anything Oasis ever produced. See, that all about taste.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » If I told you that I think the cheeky girls song 'We are the cheeky girls' is better than Beethoven's 7th symphony would you think I was crazy or would you not think it was strange
flookdgates wrote: » Imagine spending hours of you life defending a manchild with a bag on his head on an internet forum for pensioners. "Blindboy" (stupid name) doesn't care about you or even know you exist. Why treat him like a God whose every word is gospel?
flookdgates wrote: » Imagine spending hours of you life defending a manchild with a bag on his head on an internet forum for pensioners.
kubjones wrote: » I think the reason it resonated with young people so much was because the satire was targeted at an area of Irish society that the likes of RTE and all our other Media tends to ignore or brush under the carpet. Its relatable because most kids growing up in this country have had to deal with those kind of people that would rob shops, take yokes and fight all the time. Its so common its easy to forget how ridiculous it is sometimes.
Wibbs wrote: » I can certainly see how they would appeal to that demographic of I would imagine mostly urban young men alright(maybe with a side order of non Dublin centric going on?). That's not easy to pull off either. You can't do it cynically that's for sure. You'll be caught out. There's a long history to that kinda music. Rap before it went mainstream into white suburbia and largely ate itself an obvious one. Punk another. And people outside the demographic, not just old farts either, just don't get it, often vehemently. Well I suppose they're not meant to get it. It's not aimed at them and it's not their lives and experience.
Woke Hogan wrote: » I'd honestly only imagine particularly dimwitted teenagers would like that. Nodding along with its lyrics sagely before turning to their equally dimwitted friend, both agreeing on how "like, deep it is, like" before rolling a massive three skinner.
Deleted User wrote: » Ah now, lads. The Rubbebandit’s demographic was never disaffected urban youth. It was student types and former student types who indulged in the heavy drinking and light drug taking the boys sang about. This was back when they were a more of comedy music duo and less about the art or letting people know that they are not actually buffoons but really smart guys under the masks. Their demographic these days seems to be thirty-something women and serious young men with very little sense of humour.
flookdgates wrote: » BTW the Rubberbandits (Bob McGlynn ad Dave Chambers) are not from working class backgrounds themselves. They are posh boys from the affluent suburbs.
Deleted User wrote: » Ah now, lads. The Rubbebandit’s demographic was never disaffected urban youth. It was student types and former student types who indulged in the heavy drinking and light drug taking the boys sang about. This was back when they were a more of comedy music duo and less about the art or letting people know that they are not actually buffoons but really smart guys under the masks. Their demographic these days seems to be thirty-something year old women and serious young men with very little sense of humour.
flookdgates wrote: » ^^^ Bang on post. Do you really think working class lads in Limerick are having discussions about the patriarchy and toxic masculinity? Rubberbandits target audience are hysterical middle aged feminists and their beta orbiters. BTW the Rubberbandits (Bob McGlynn ad Dave Chambers) are not from working class backgrounds themselves. They are posh boys from the affluent suburbs.
Woke Hogan wrote: » So what?