D'Agger wrote: » The supply will have to increase for the older apartments prices to go down both from a sale and rental perspective I'd imagine/hope. The lack of supply to the rental market is allowing people to charge 1400 for 2 beds and the bubble currently being experienced for 2nd hand housing is only going to be abated by affordable housing being created. Went to a viewing in Jacobs Island a year ago, apartment put up for 180k by DNG Creedon, it was a frenzy, people giving verbal agreements to 220k as I was leaving and it was at that point I decided that I wouldn't be able to buy for a minimum of two years. I'm one of those people who could probably just about afford something now, but would be getting bent over on a 2nd hand housing market that's inflated dramatically in the past 24months. Not worth it IMO so going to wait and see.
Rfrip wrote: » D'Agger wrote: » The supply will have to increase for the older apartments prices to go down both from a sale and rental perspective I'd imagine/hope. The lack of supply to the rental market is allowing people to charge 1400 for 2 beds and the bubble currently being experienced for 2nd hand housing is only going to be abated by affordable housing being created. Went to a viewing in Jacobs Island a year ago, apartment put up for 180k by DNG Creedon, it was a frenzy, people giving verbal agreements to 220k as I was leaving and it was at that point I decided that I wouldn't be able to buy for a minimum of two years. I'm one of those people who could probably just about afford something now, but would be getting bent over on a 2nd hand housing market that's inflated dramatically in the past 24months. Not worth it IMO so going to wait and see. Stalking the property register at the moment and an apt in jacobs island was on daft for 235k and sold for 210 this month
snotboogie wrote: » Under Construction 89-90 South Mall: 50,000 sq ft office, 5 storey office building.To be completed in December 18' Dalata Hotel South Mall: Six storey hotel, 165 beds. To be completed in December 18'
marno21 wrote: » Council have tendered for substantial footpath work on Centre Park Roadhttps://irl.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=132733&PP=ctm/Supplier/PublicTenders&B=ETENDERS_SIMPLE&PS=1 Must mean no movement on the big ticket upgrade anytime soon.
Evening Echo wrote: PLANS for a 15-storey office building in the heart of Cork city have received the support of the City Architect and the Deputy Chief Executive of Cork City Council despite objections to the building's height from heritage body An Taisce and a senior planner. [...] While they approved the proposed height of the building, both Mr Duggan and Mr Ledwidge said further information should be sought from the developers on the extent of the transparency of the glazing system the building will have. City Hall has also requested further information on traffic and visual impact issues.Tower Holdings now has six months to comply with the further information request after which City Hall will have four weeks to make a decision.
questionmark? wrote: » The people objecting to the proposed Prism building are unable to offer any alternative. They would it seems rather it remains a run down empty site to be used by junkies and rats beside the main public transport hub than a modern building bringing investment and jobs to the city. The objection culture in Cork and Ireland in general is a joke.
mire wrote: » Ireland has a planning system that allows for people to make objections; I don't have a problem with this. From my perspective, people making objections in this case are absolutely entitled to do so. I would tend to disagree with their position but that doesn't mean that I think that they should be silenced. Quite often people making submissions actually do some service -they often end up encouraging higher standards and keep developers on their toes. This is no harm. By the way I'm not sure that anyone making the submission on the site has suggested that the site should be left as it is. I'm not particularly excited by this scheme, as many people seem to be, but I really hope it gets permission and it would be disappointing if there are two or four floors taken off just for the sake of it.
marno21 wrote: » The NTA will shortly publish a Cork Transport Strategy (usually covers 15-20 years) which will outline strategic investment priorities for transport in Cork (bus, rail, cycling, pedestrians, roads). They published one for Dublin in 2015 - here https://www.nationaltransport.ie/planning-policy/greater-dublin-areatransport-strategy-2016-2035/ - which has led to a number of projects being advanced (4 Luas lines, Metro, DART Expansion, BusConnects, various cycling projects) This should really help the PT situation in Cork and give some clear direction as to where investment will be pushed in coming years. I expect FINALLY to have a policy based programme for new railway stations and enhanced fleet in Cork (some REALLY obvious locations for commuter rail stations in Cork). I look forward to this as it will finally see Cork having some sort of plan for public transport instead of the disorganised mess at present.
Pitcairn wrote: » I said this before, but the Prism is actually a bit of a test building by the O'Sullivan brothers. They have built a load of skyscrapers in New York and are now planning buildings in Ireland. They have also bought Custom House Quay where the two channels of the River Lee meet. They are planning an even larger building than Prism for that key site (although we have yet to see the actual plans or designs). If Prism gets through the planning process and they manage to build it then it should augur well for Custom House. That said I would expect an even larger debate about building heights and heritage issues when it comes to the Custom House Quay.
Meursault wrote: » The 40 storey building they have planned for Anderson quay is very ambitious. I think they plan on restoring the old bonded warehouses to their former glory, so I can't see why An Taisce or anyone else would have an objection. They'll probably be burned down in the next few years, if nothing happens on that site, as we have seen with plenty of other historical buildings around cork.
the beer revolu wrote: » The bonded warehouse still operates as a bonded warehouse.
marno21 wrote: » An Taisce have them down as vacant - has something changed recently ?
SleetAndSnow wrote: » I was walking by navigation square and saw people working on those bonded warehouses the other day, on the outside of them. Not sure what exactly they were doing. However, doesn’t the 40 story tower wish to keep those warehouses, do them up and have them connected to the tower in some way? That’s how the image looked anyway
snotboogie wrote: » Is there any update on this? How does this fit with the docklands development plan?
marno21 wrote: » No update I'm afraid. Looks like Cork BusConnects is #3 behind Dublin and Galway at the minute.
snotboogie wrote: » I got a pamphlet in the door at home which implied that the Patrick street car ban was the start of Busconnects. It also mentioned the infamous rapid transport corridor from Mahon to Ballincollig too. I’m just pretty confused how busconnects, the docklands development plan, the North Docks plan, South docks plan, Tivoli docks plan, height rezoning for the 40 storey and the BRT all tie in together.
marno21 wrote: » Light rail is inevitable for Cork given its growth. I'd like to see some sort of Leerail or equivilant branding on the future Cork commuter network and the future light rail system. Mallow-Midleton/Cobh and Ballincollig-Mahon or whatever is planned The NTA Cork Transport Strategy will include some new railway stations on Mallow-Middleton which is good news.
Captainsatnav wrote: » Light rail? CART , if you will. Better chance of Cork hosting Olympics I'd say.