Deiseen wrote: » 914 wrote: » Getting back to move positive news.... A contractor is to be appointed for the Michael Street development in mid september for demolition works to make way for the €58 million shopping centre development on the site. That is great to hear! Where's your source?
914 wrote: » Getting back to move positive news.... A contractor is to be appointed for the Michael Street development in mid september for demolition works to make way for the €58 million shopping centre development on the site.
TheQuietFella wrote: » I think that there was a lead (Pb) issue on the site?
curmudgeonly wrote: » FYI To be fair to Mr Frisby , he is in the final throes of having an EPA licence lifted from the site and NO planning application would be entertained whilst it is active.
Gavlor wrote: » Glass site is owned by Noel frisby and will eventually become a housing estate.... once mass building becomes profitable again!
JourneyMan8 wrote: » Living in cork at the mo and love that on every street there's something to do, not the same stuff either, in Waterford everything is in a litte area and it's all the same things, this needs to change. Instead of putting another ****ty bar in by the foundry put something else in there. Same with Harvey's building, an adult arcade like they have in the states would fit nice down there or a fancy restaurant. Waterford will always have potential, it will eventually get back to where it belongs. Just needs to start thinking outside the box more. What's being done with places like the old glass factory? Risky place to do it but a big mahon point style centre would be decent there. Alot of big buildings in Waterford just sat being eye sores.
azimuth17 wrote: » I was in around town today and a lovely atmosphere. Some load of rubbish being posted here by people with an agenda. Council has done huge work and almost everyone posting here has ignored demolition on North Quays and planning for new bridge etc. I was in town for almost seven hours from 12 until 6.30 and life everywhere. Really busy, really nice lunch and really good feel about the place. After the economic hit we took about eight or nine years ago a lot of effort has been made. it may or may not pay off, most of us hope it will, but it is being done. We don't need lectures from people with an obvious agenda to run the city down.There is a whole lot of trolling going on I also recommend that people look at the SEEM report to get a wider perspective..
Muttley79 wrote: » I have to agree on most points... ..... lag behind the other cities of Ireland unfortunately
Harry Palmr wrote: » I've said before that a paint budget would make a huge difference to the centre, the other thing that would help is property owners being forced to fix up empty sites and shacks.
hardybuck wrote: » Waterford as a brand and as a product needs a lot of help. I no longer live in Waterford, but a few things strike me: Waterford, despite being a medium sized county, does resonate with people when they ask me where I'm from. Older folk (those in their 60s say) will mention things like the glass, the Showband era, and going on holidays to Tramore as a kid. Most of them will lament the demise of Waterford, and wonder will it ever get back. People in their mid 30s up to 40s will remember a great night life scene, but haven't been down there in years. People from their mid 30s down will tell you things like, 'Jesus it's awful rough down there' and tell you how much of a kip it is. Many of them will tell you they went down to Armore or Dungarvan and had a nice weekend or stag. So, a few challenges there in terms of perception, but at least it does resonate with people more than a Louth, Laois or Westmeath. As someone who has moved away, my wife definitely wouldn't live there. Nor would any of my brothers or sisters spouses who aren't from Waterford. One of the main reasons for that is that they are struck by how little buzz there is in town in comparison to the other cities, and even big towns. The quality of shopping isn't at all good either, and all these things are immediately visable to a visitor. While I applaud the efforts of the Council and locals to improve the Viking Triangle and the public realm in the city centre, the subarbs are in rag order. They look run down, you can see investment hasn't been made outside of the city centre, and again that's quite apparent to someone who might be considering coming to Waterford to live. I don't want to put anyone's noses out of joint, I'd love to see it back thriving, but it's in dire need of investment. That has to come from Government, but also from businesses (both big industry and SMEs) and consumers. I think the fortunes of Waterford, Tramore and Dunmore are closely linked too. I can't believe that towns of the size of Tramore and Dunmore, which both rely so much on tourism, are both lacking one good quality hotel (very good four star or 5 star) in either of them. If the tourist product in both towns improves and visitors come down in bigger numbers, Waterford will benefit greatly also.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Where is then? Or are you suggesting there isn't a driver?
Muttley79 wrote: » I have to agree on most points there,dunmore has the potential to be a huge tourism spot if they built a proper pier to take in the cruise ships that stop there,Tramore could be the biggest seaside resort in the country if they invested in hotels and family things to do.the amusement park has taken over Tramore and while it is nice it’s a slight bit tacky and it only for 3 months of the summer.the Main Street in Tramore has to be the biggest run down Main Street in Ireland where a lot of buildings are gone shabby,anything good that’s proposed for Tramore always gets knocked by the same people objecting to planning.waterford,from John street to o Connell street needs a massive facelift,yeah it’s all great and good if this new north quay gets the go ahead but it wont have atmosphere in the city,as you will have to walk over a big open river to get to it.of course the whole issue with the airport and collage as a university is having a huge down effect on Waterford.you see cork Kerry and limerick all pulling together for regional development but the problem with the south east is Carlow Kilkenny and wexford align themselves to much to dublin,the south east is to broken up to come together as a region.carlow want the university status and Kilkenny talking about building an airport in the past,so not until all the south east counties unite and sees Waterford as the main driver of the region I fear Waterford is going to constantly lag behind the other cities of Ireland unfortunately
Deiseen wrote: » Imagine if you replaced the Quay with a narrow street with shops/bars on both sides, it would have a great atmosphere but the Quay is just a wide open, empty space.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Every time I am around John Street I'm struck by how awful a kip it is.