Speakerboxx wrote: » 100 % . you hit the nail on the head there. He was usually frustrated when he lost with Clare but he was smug and happy after the game the last day. Wexford should give him the boot fast.
terryrogers wrote: » Thought kk were a bit naive at times and could have been a bit cuter with fouls when Limerick were in control. Ironically they seem to be too clean for their own good this year, they seem to be giving away less frees than their opponents.
grenache wrote: » They weren't naive when it came to pulling the hurley out of an opponent's hand. I counted at least 5 times where Paddy Deegan yanked Aaron Gillane's hurley off him. Would have been funny if it wasn't so obvious. Neither ref nor linesman seemed to cop it, bar one free given near the Kinane Stand in the first half. Of course when Deegan wasn't pulling Gillane's hurley, he was digging him with his own hurley - he was a very lucky boy to stay on the field.
Joe Daly wrote: » You never mentioned Gillane kicking out on a couple of occasions on Paddy Deegan also pulling his hurl he went down soft Mcgrath told him to get up .
Bonniedog wrote: » Eir showed the 1994 final between Offaly and Limerick this morning. Amazing finish. Offaly had 11 point turnaround in last 6 minutes! Most noticeable thing about the game was that defenders never tried to burst out through tackles. They took a step back and fired it over their shoulder. There were lots of big tough men on both sides but you can see from them that none of them were probably doing gym time. Beginning of the high intensity training and emphasis on physicality was Wexford under Griffin and Limerick once again were the bridesmaids.
I says wrote: » I would have thought loughnanes Clare were the first real super fit and athletic team from that era.
Bonniedog wrote: » Good point. Had overlooked them. Amazing to recall how long it took Kilkenny to cope with the new type of game. Of course when they did, they became the masters of the more physical approach.
terryrogers wrote: » And Cork always seem to have the ref on their side too. .
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » Garbage comment
Clareman wrote: » I'm loving the old matches on Eir, total surprise when I flick over. The biggest change (besides fitness) is the size of the hurleys, j@ysus they were long thin things back in the day
Clareman wrote: » In my day* you'd stand up and have a 28", 30", 32" hurley next to you and whichever was closest to the hip you got, you always got the slightly bigger 1 cause sure you'd grow into it. I remember in training once being drilled about shortening the grip and how you didn't need a long swing to have a long puck, I asked why we didn't just have a shorter hurley then, the trainer couldn't answer it. Back then training often involved lines of 3 across the pitch where the lad on the middle had to pull on the ball to keep it as it was passed by the guys at the end, had to use both sides of course. *Yes, I am old
Bonniedog wrote: » Game has certainly evolved. It is a long way from great backs like Sylvie belting the ball up the field without anything other than hope that Lynskey or Cooney would beat their man assuming it came their direction, to the way Tommy Walsh used to take a second and try to pick out a man. Old games are great to watch but much better game now I think.
Slieve Gullion wrote: » :rolleyes:
I says wrote: » Refs would have a heart attack if ya went into the pack of players trying to rise the ball and ya ploughed in like a thundering hoare swinging the hurl wildly pulling on the first thing that moves. As the old saying went if it moved pull on it and if it doesn’t pull anyways. Ground hurling or doubling on the ball would nearly get ya sent off now for dangerous play.
zetecescort wrote: » Sure you cant pull the ball when its thrown in by the ref nowadays