Canis Lupus wrote: » On the one hand this is bad.... On the other hand I have little pity for someone who buys a macbook pro. I'm very conflicted over this....
jacksie66 wrote: » It's gas that you have to buy a separate adaptor to plug your apple iPhone into your apple macbook..
[Deleted User] wrote: » Meh, if you have the cash, Macbooks are good. Never had a Pro but had a regular 13" one nearly a decade ago and enjoyed it. Then Linux for two years, and now back to Windows where I'll stay.
JigglyMcJabs wrote: » A macbook from 10 years ago is a different beast, much better than the style over substance rubbish these days.
Chewbacca wrote: » I'd say you did, you dirty minx!
valoren wrote: » Is the MacBook even a core product any more though? Is Apple even a 'computer' company anymore?
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
Deleted User wrote: » Meh, if you have the cash, Macbooks are good. Never had a Pro but had a regular 13" one nearly a decade ago and enjoyed it. Then Linux for two years, and now back to Windows where I'll stay.
Wibbs wrote: » This. They had their pros and cons, but over the last few years I really don't know what they're smoking. Perfect example: dropping their clever and very practical magnetic connection for power on their laptops in favour of USB 3 "thunderbolt" sockets(indeed the only connections on them). I suspect because "it looks good". Their aesthetic design was always part of their appeal, but it was backed up with good engineering design too. Put it this way; the laptop we use today regardless of the OS owes a huge debt to Apple's design and innovations down the years(obvious things like keyboard near the screen, palm rest below. Trackpads. to name but two). Now the aesthetic types seem to have taken over. QV Jonathon Ives. EG: Powerbook G3 from twenty years ago. Two decades old with USB, Firewire, DVD writer(remember those), RAM expandable to one Gb, Hard drive up to 120 Gb, wireless, ethernet, 8-10 hour battery life with two batteries on board, upgradable CPU. There wasn't another manufacturers laptop that could rival it. When even many dyed in the wool Mac fans consider a four or five year old Macbook better than their latest models it speaks volumes. It's convenient to pin down the fall off with Steve Jobs' death, but it fits well with when the rot set in.
Jett Spoiled Yearbook wrote: » Macs are far far superior to windows machines despite what the Apple haters like to think. They are expensive but so are comparible windows machines problem is people compare an Aldi bargin laptop to a MacBook Pro and cry about it being way more expensive. I have a top of the range windows laptop provided by work and it’s left in the drawer of my desk gathering dust as I much prefer to use my own mackbook pro instead which on paper has lower spec but in practic is far superior. As the saying goes, once you go Mac you’ll never go back.
bluewolf wrote: » Did you just make up that "saying", nox