RIGOLO wrote: » And like all economic numbers it has to be looked at in tandem with many others wage earnings, debt , deficit, GDP, inflation , interest rates, yield curve etc. All of which are very positive and reflect Trump Administration achievements on the multi-strategy multi-pronged economic strategy.
RIGOLO wrote: » All this guff about the economic progress being the result of Obama has to stop at some point, at some point anti-Trumpers will have to accept its now become Trumps economy.. or do ye plan on saying any positive economic data is the result of Obama right up to November 2020,
So what is the most honest way of talking about the Trump economy? It goes like this: The president inherited an economy that had come a long way toward healing. During his administration, the economy has continued growing at about the same rate it did before he took office, pushing incomes, employment and output to yet higher levels. There are plenty of problems that remain in the United States, economic and otherwise, and the degree of credit the president deserves for the state of the economy is an open debate. But this is a bathtub that is already pretty full, and the water’s rising nicely.
RIGOLO wrote: » As any economist will tell you creating jobs in rising market is far harder than creating jobs when you have injected $4Trillion in QE into the economy. And like all economic numbers it has to be looked at in tandem with many others wage earnings, debt , deficit, GDP, inflation , interest rates, yield curve etc. All of which are very positive and reflect Trump Administration achievements on the multi-strategy multi-pronged economic strategy. All this guff about the economic progress being the result of Obama has to stop at some point, at some point anti-Trumpers will have to accept its now become Trumps economy.. or do ye plan on saying any positive economic data is the result of Obama right up to November 2020, or perhaps do ye plan to extend that into the second term 2020-2024 and if the US economy is doing well then its because of Obama 8 years ago.Besides your ignoring the reality of what the American voters experienced in their pockets.. Remember Obama and the DNC lost over 1000 local, state and congress seats in his 8 years , and ultimately the voters rejected more of the same economic policy when HRC was offered to them in 2016. Its Trumps Administrations economy and its booming. Roll on November , the blue wave will lock in the house and Senate a, perhaps another SCOTUS pick, and 2020 will be a lock in also. ohh and before the usual typical remarks about 'whatabouttery ' cos I mentioned Obama, Im responding to a post where someone else brought up Obama. Max Foster CNN reporting from outside Windsor said theres no sign of much of a protest, alot of barriers but not many protestors is what he said. I dont see that massive protest materialising, even the numbers in London look pretty small so far.
RIGOLO wrote: » Max Foster CNN reporting from outside Windsor said theres no sign of much of a protest, alot of barriers but not many protestors is what he said. I dont see that massive protest materialising, even the numbers in London look pretty small so far.
robinph wrote: » That's why they have gone to Windsor, Blenheim, Chequers etc. They are locations within easy helicopter distance, but not great for the general public to get to in large numbers. The protests are in the centre of London.
RIGOLO wrote: » As any economist will tell you creating jobs in rising market is far harder than creating jobs when you have injected $4Trillion in QE into the economy. And like all economic numbers it has to be looked at in tandem with many others wage earnings, debt , deficit, GDP, inflation , interest rates, yield curve etc. All of which are very positive and reflect Trump Administration achievements on the multi-strategy multi-pronged economic strategy. All this guff about the economic progress being the result of Obama has to stop at some point, at some point anti-Trumpers will have to accept its now become Trumps economy..
RIGOLO wrote: » As any economist will tell you creating jobs in rising market is far harder than creating jobs when you have injected $4Trillion in QE into the economy.
RIGOLO wrote: » All this guff about the economic progress being the result of Obama has to stop at some point, at some point anti-Trumpers will have to accept its now become Trumps economy.. or do ye plan on saying any positive economic data is the result of Obama right up to November 2020, or perhaps do ye plan to extend that into the second term 2020-2024 and if the US economy is doing well then its because of Obama 8 years ago.Besides your ignoring the reality of what the American voters experienced in their pockets.. Remember Obama and the DNC lost over 1000 local, state and congress seats in his 8 years , and ultimately the voters rejected more of the same economic policy when HRC was offered to them in 2016. Its Trumps Administrations economy and its booming. Roll on November , the blue wave will lock in the house and Senate a, perhaps another SCOTUS pick, and 2020 will be a lock in also. ohh and before the usual typical remarks about 'whatabouttery ' cos I mentioned Obama, Im responding to a post where someone else brought up Obama. Max Foster CNN reporting from outside Windsor said theres no sign of much of a protest, alot of barriers but not many protestors is what he said. I dont see that massive protest materialising, even the numbers in London look pretty small so far.
dr.fuzzenstein wrote: » OK, I am willing to say that Trump has, so far, not managed to destroy the economy. But he's a republican, give it time.
Captain Obvious wrote: » RIGOLO wrote: » And like all economic numbers it has to be looked at in tandem with many others wage earnings, debt , deficit, GDP, inflation , interest rates, yield curve etc. All of which are very positive and reflect Trump Administration achievements on the multi-strategy multi-pronged economic strategy. This is just nonsense, or more likely, flat out lies. National debt is projected to soar by ten trillion dollars over the next ten years. The deficit is expected to rise to a trillion annually. Inflation has hit a six year high and wiped out the meager wage benefits anyone has gotten.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/federal-deficit-tax-cuts-spending-trump.htmlhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/07/12/inflation-hits-year-high-wiping-out-wage-gains-average-american/?__twitter_impression=true&utm_term=.87f98c4986ec What world are you living in?
Thargor wrote: » dr.fuzzenstein wrote: » OK, I am willing to say that Trump has, so far, not managed to destroy the economy. But he's a republican, give it time. Rigolo can you please look at this graph and tell us how you can claim any of it is Trumps doing with a straight face? You're either lying or completely economically illiterate.
Hande hoche! wrote: » He is striking a conciliatory tone during the press conference. Of course that might not last long...
B0jangles wrote: » Isn't that what he always does? He's all smiles and compliments when the person's in the room with him; he's usually only brave enough to start with the insults when he's safely out of the country.
Quin_Dub wrote: » I think the general consensus is that it takes about 18 months or so for a new administrations policies to start being influential to the overall economic indicators.. So for Trump , that's around now. And guess what?.. The numbers don't look great moving forward from here. The net set of bond yields are likely to be ugly. The approval ratings for his Budget changes is dropping as people see the full implications of the change - Yes most people are seeing a few extra dollars in their pay checks (nothing like the huge windfall for the mega wealthy and Corporations though ) , but they have lost far more that they have gained through price increases etc. and they are seeing the inequality of the benefits more clearly as well. So , no the outlook for the "Trump Economy" is not great at all. It's probably fair to say that the longer term negative implications of his policies will not be seen fully before November so it's impact one way or the other is unclear.. The Dems are unlikely to be able to use the economy as a weapon against Trump in November (but absolutely will in 2020) , but equally the GOP aren't going to have a whole lot to crow about either..
RIGOLO wrote: » Frankly mollysmiddleamerica.blogspot isnt on my bookmarks. I have Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, FT etc to name but a few, I look to their charts, Ive not been tracking mollysmiddleamerica economic reports. As Ive said before And like all economic numbers it has to be looked at in tandem with many others wage earnings, debt , deficit, GDP, inflation , interest rates, yield curve etc. All of which are very positive and reflect Trump Administration achievements on the multi-strategy multi-pronged economic strategy.
RIGOLO wrote: » 18 months.. theres zero serious economic commentators that would consider Obamas shadow has lasted that long. The Trump Administration made so many and such sesimic changes in such a short space of time theres very little if anything left of Obama economic policy. I suspect the 18 months ohh it was all Obama concept ,is a head in the sand outlook , a sort of comfort blanket for those who see progress under Trump but cling to a fallacy that any progress is due to Obama... cling to it, cling to it .. it will keep you warm in November when GOP romp home but it will be worn out by 2020 when Trump II begins.
everlast75 wrote: » https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1017759398377205761 Will someone now please get this guy mentally assessed?
RIGOLO wrote: » Frankly mollysmiddleamerica.blogspot isnt on my bookmarks. I have Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, FT etc to name but a few, I look to their charts, Ive not been tracking mollysmiddleamerica economic reports.
