Testosterscone wrote: » This is worth a read as it might be of interest (article on the older side)http://www.scienceofrunning.com/2012/06/physiological-model-of-training-why-i.html?v=7c78ebb4c223 Your training has been solid so far and seems to be working and if you are happy to keep ploughing on that way you will probably continue to see benefits but don't be afraid to branch out from the "by the numbers" approach every once in a while even for your own sanity if nothing else.
shotgunmcos wrote: » Gorgeous evening. Sunny, warm and calm. After struggling through last night's run I took a bottle of water out too, about 600mls.
Neady83 wrote: » Are you popping some dioralyte into your bottle these days? I threw one into the bottle that I had at training last night and I think it helped with the lethargy from the heat (mind you, that could just have been psychological).
RayCun wrote: » Surely those paces are for next spring, when you are doing the Hanson programme and in shape for a shot at sub 3? You couldn't run a 5k or 10k at the prescribed paces, so why are you trying to do a long run at that pace?
RayCun wrote: » Well over half your weekly mileage should be slow and easy. I think you are way off sub 3 shape at the moment. You're improving fast, so by the start of the programme you have a good chance of being able to manage it, but right now, no. And trying to train that far ahead of your fitness never ends well. You didn't run that on heart rate, do you know what your HR was?
shotgunmcos wrote: » Re: HR I did. It was the only metric on the watch face (the fancy coloured zone screen) 146avg 160max heart rate. The max was on the hill near the end. Overall the run was in effort range that my other LRs have been. I just kept the pace steady over lumpy bits. Link below. Genuinely interested to know what red flags you see? It felt tougher more as I've done 120 miles over the last 2 weeks than just the pace. That's a whole new ballpark for me!https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/2834700959 You are right I'm nowhere near sub3 shape or the fitness to start the program. I shouldn't be. What would you see as good milestones over the next 5 months? I'm not trying to run those paces with the exception of Thursdays. I'll start building some PM intervals. Up to 5m which will set me up for a shot at sub40 10k (TT or race). Would you see anything wrong with that?
shotgunmcos wrote: » Not fast enough! Trying stuff out. I'll likely go for the Hanson's approach. Prescribed paces based on goal marathon time are: Recovery 8:43 Aerobic A 8:10 Aerobic B 7:36 Moderate Aerobic/Long Run 7:17 MP (Tempo) 6:40 Strength 6:30 10k 6:07 5k 5:52
RayCun wrote: » Waterford hasn't sold out - it hasn't opened entries yet for 2018