RIGOLO wrote: » The winds are in the sails of the GOP, Dems need to get their act together , its too late for November, at best its damage limitation for the DNC, try not to totally implode before then and perhaps rally by 2020. But they dont seem to be learning by any of their mistakes, nor are they keen to take any advice or insight. Their echo chamber approach is only benefiting GOP.
RIGOLO wrote: » Another stellar week for the Trump administration, their forward momentum continues to make progress.
Nox wrote: » It appears that multiple posters here either didn't see/hear the speech given by President Donald J Trump in Montana or they are following the words of a song I posted several pages ago … "still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest". The POTUS did not condone what Pruitt did outside his duties as Secretary … what he lauded was the regulations that were rescinded. O well … "still a man hears …"
everlast75 wrote: » Trump is hardly going to clap him on the back and say "well done for the fantastic waste of tax payers money Scott". Trump is an idiot, but not even that much of an idiot. He said he did a wonderful job. And part of that job is an obligation not to take the p*ss, or to use the more correct phrase - not to bring the position into disrepute. But you and I know Trump doesn't care about that, because as far as he was concerned, 14 investigations launched did not prompt Trump to fire him.
mcmoustache wrote: » His speeches are always the same old rambling nonsense. "Crooked Hillary" "2016 election win" (with incorrect electoral college numbers) "Low IQ <insert black person>" "ICE liberated someplace from MS13" "Lock her up!" "Lying Media and anonymous sources" "Doing a great job" "Democrats trying to destroy America" "No Collusion" "Witch Hunt" "13 Angry Democrats" "Drain the swamp" "Clean Coal" "Nancy Pelosi" I could go on but the point that I'm making here is that his speeches are nothing more than a greatest hits compilation of soundbites delivered in a stream of consciousness style that's linguistically painful to parse despite his limited vocabulary. If you think his speeches are worth praising, you clearly have no experience with oratory.
everlast75 wrote: » You also forgot his latest, re Dianne Feinstein, questioning her heritage, at that Montana rally.
mcmoustache wrote: » I think you mean Elizabeth Warren there.
Leroy42 wrote: » It is not often that I get things right, but sometimes it really is so obvious what is going to happen
I have broken more Elton John records, he seems to have a lot of records. And I, by the way, I don’t have a musical instrument. I don’t have a guitar or an organ. No organ. Elton has an organ. And lots of other people helping. No we’ve broken a lot of records. We’ve broken virtually every record. Because you know, look I only need this space. They need much more room. For basketball, for hockey and all of the sports, they need a lot of room. We don’t need it. We have people in that space. So we break all of these records. Really we do it without like, the musical instruments. This is the only musical: the mouth. And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth. Right? The brain, more important than the mouth, is the brain. The brain is much more important.
mcmoustache wrote: » In case anyone thought that I was being unkind in describing Trump's Montana speech as rambling incoherent rubbish with a small vocabulary, that quote is from that night. Here's the video if you want to lose braincells.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUdo5kuLf-E How people can see these speeches as being clever or inspirational or even coherent is beyond me. I've seen, heard and read good and average speeches. Trump's don't even come close.
Nox wrote: » All of this blather about President Donald J Trump and yet not one poster has mentioned the size of the crowds he draws. Packed auditoriums with thousands waiting outside … everywhere he gives a speech. The hate speech given by the congressperson encouraging harassment had at most a couple dozen folks … all of whom were in the picture. If this is such a 'blue wave' …. where are the droplets (aka democrats/socialists).
looksee wrote: » You refer to the 'hate' speech having 'a couple dozen folks all of whom were in the picture' but then expect us to accept your assurance that Trump had huge crowds. Even Trump tv chose not to pan round the auditorium to show us these milling throngs of enthusiasts. And we have only his word about the 'thousands' outside, and we all know what his word and his ability to count are worth.
President Donald Trump is touting the size of the crowd at his rally in Nashville Tuesday evening, a day after suggesting the audience was larger than the building allows. On Wednesday morning Trump said on Twitter that the New York Times estimates about the size of the crowd inside Municipal Auditorium were wrong. The newspaper reported the crowd to be about 1,000. The article was later updated to reflect the actual size of the crowd, which officials said contained 5,500 people. The USA TODAY NETWORK-Tennessee confirmed the total with fire officials Wednesday morning. Despite officials' estimates, the Trump campaign double-down Wednesday afternoon saying there were 8,000 people at the rally. In his tweet, the president said the audience at the rally was “many times that number.”
Nox wrote: » Plenty of disputed claims of President Donald J Trump rally attendance. I found it quite amusing that one of the listed 'sources' was from January 2017. And there have been multiple examples of the crowd being scanned. Something tells me that the sheer absence of 'fact check' articles about the crowds outside the speech venues speaks volumes. And as far as the 'hate speech' …. stirring up a crowd with venom to incite actions hardly qualifies for title of 'free speech'. And for the third time I must repeat myself in response to many of the previous comments … "still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest …"
