jvan wrote: » First of all, apologies to anyone that isn't familiar with the area but was just having a quick look the proposed new route replacing the 184 which will now bypass kilpedder village completely, with buses staying on the n11 both north and south. It also doesn't go to the Glenview hotel anymore. Afaik the route they are suggesting isn't possible as there is a weight restriction on the link road at Barry's bridge therefore it has to go to the Glenview to loop around. This is local to me, hence why I looked. It's a welcome that they propose linking up with Newcastle but I've always felt the Kilmacanogue bus should come to the Glenview too, thus creating a way for people to connect this way rather than having to go through Greystones and on to Bray to change buses.
dublinman1990 wrote: » We hear a lot from posters on boards that the SGs are not very favourable with lots of Dublin Bus drivers. The quality of the Wrights vehicles with Dublin Bus over those 10 years have been a mix of good and bad. The VGs & GTs have notably had a really positive mood among both drivers & passengers alike. The SGs have been the biggest failures for this current tenure of operating in Dublin. They are slow, clunky & their build quality have been really poor.
dublinman1990 wrote: » Wrights still has strong relationships in place for the future, through the NTA, with other operators Bus Eireann & Go-Ahead Ireland. But most of us here don't know how much longer that relationship with Wrights is going to last with Go Ahead Ireland. This is because they have yet begun their running their Irish operations yet from their new depot in Ballymount.
Stephen15 wrote: » Interesting so they must be being introduced on a high frequency route which needs a lot of buses. Let's hope they don't suffer a similar fate to last hybrid buses.
Qrt wrote: » I saw a tweet from an old lecturer of mine, labelling it a precursor to privatisation, and I have to agree with him (and disagree with privatisation) but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
tom1ie wrote: » Just wondering what is the opinion on privatization of the bus service on this forum? Good, bad, and why.
Qrt wrote: » Bad. Just look at England. Franchising is a mess got trains, and the free for all bus operations outside of London are a mess.
bk wrote: » But no mention of cost and no mention if they will be getting rid of driver interaction, etc.
loyatemu wrote: » I was told by the council some years ago that the weight restriction is there to prevent heavy traffic going through Delgany village. The "bridge" in question is a small concrete structure over a stream that was only installed about 10 years ago, I doubt it can't take the weight of a truck. The 184 only serves the Glenview in one direction anyway which is not particularly useful (and was only introduced in recent-ish years). The clockwise route could go through Kilpedder, though the medium term plan is to close all the unnumbered junctions on the N11 so it wouldn't be able to do so once that happens.
bk wrote: » A lot of people coming from the Northside get off on OCS and shop on Henry St. Gardiner Street will be quiet a walk from there.
jd wrote: » Or they can stay on the bus and then walk across Halfpenny Bridge
bk wrote: » BTW in case anyone missed it, the details of the redesign of the Bus network were published a few days ago. A lot of really interesting and exciting stuff there IMO, you can read through the changes here:https://www.busconnects.ie/initiatives/dublin-area-bus-network-redesign-public-consultation-report/ Basically there will be core radial, high frequency spine routes called A, B, C to G. Which when you get far enough out of the city, will split into spurs, e.g. A1, A2. For example the buses on the Swords road, which would currently be the likes of the 1, 11, 13, 16, 41 will become the "A" corridor as far as Whitehall and then the A1 will head towards Clongriffin, A2 to the Airport, A3 to Swords, A4 to DCU. These core routes will have very high frequency all day, even off peak. For instance the A will be every 3 minutes most of the day! And there will also be increased frequency weekends. They don't say it, but I suspect these core routes will eventually become 24/7 routes. The other major part of the plan is a whole load of high frequency orbital routes. A O route ringing the inner city, then a N2, N4, N6 orbitals on the north side from the closest to the city out. W2, W4, on the West side, S2, S4, etc. on the south side. These are pretty high frequency in some cases and connect with DART stations, universities, etc. There also going to release a new 90 minute fare, which allows you to switch between multiple buses, Luas and DART in 90 minutes for just one fare, likely between €2.15 and €2.60. I suspect this will basically become the default fare across Dublin. All of this is separate the bus lanes plan, the 2 billion to build 200km of continuous bus lanes and supporting infrastructure. More details on that to come in October. BTW lots of conversation on the above over in the C&T forum. All exciting stuff IMO.
tom1ie wrote: » So to get the type of frequencies that are proposed in this report I presume more busses and obviously the qbc’s from bus connects are needed. Is the money for the new busses coming from the 2 billion bus connects pot or is the money coming from a different pot altogether? Or do we have enough busses and it’s just a case of reorganizing everything to operate to this plan? Looks great though, but frequency and capacity will all hinge on getting the qbc’s built which won’t be easy in a lot of the areas.
Qrt wrote: » There only needs to be approx 25 new buses I think. Nothing extraordinary.
Stephen15 wrote: » 125 additional buses are coming once GAI take over their routes
tom1ie wrote: » Are these paid for by the nta? Is it out of bus connects money?
LXFlyer wrote: » Every PSO bus is funded by the NTA.
tom1ie wrote: » Yes I know that but I’m just wondering are these extra busses coming out of the bus connects allocated money or if it’s funded via a separate money stream.
bk wrote: » I get the impression that extra buses beyond the normal 100 per year replacements is coming out of the NTA/Department of Transport budget. I'd suspect it is coming out of the money allocated to the BusConnects project. During the presentation to DCC, the NTA person said that he had spoken to Dublin Bus that morning and had assured them they will get whatever new buses they need for expansion. However it should also be understood that a lot of this growth comes from reorganising the network. A lot of it is coming from more off peak and weekend services. Thing to realise less then half of Dublin Buses fleet operates off peak. The rest of the buses sit in depot unused during the day. So there shouldn't be a major issue with using these buses. The bigger issue will likely be funding the wages for extra drivers and extra hours to operate them. Wages make up the majority of the cost of running a bus. The other thing to keep in mind is that if the bus lane plan goes ahead in full, along with ticketing and dwell time improvements. There should be a 50% decrease in journey times. Which should allow you to turn buses back around faster and get more productivity out of the existing fleet of buses and drivers.
devnull wrote: » It's not as many as that - Go Ahead Dublin have 125 buses worth of work but that is after the increased frequencies of 30% are taken into consideration. Any buses that go to Go-Ahead will be replaced by new Buses to Dublin Bus which will then be redeployed onto other routes.
Stephen15 wrote: » How many buses will the city fleet grow by then. DB and GAI included?
tom1ie wrote: » Looks like I will be on the 16 (15b currently). Bus every 20-25 mins all day which is pretty much the frequency at the moment maybe 5 mins more frequent. The route looks more direct into the cc, it’s just a shame the 16 won’t go down to barrow street anymore. Looks like it’ll be terminating at college green. Overall I’m happy though.
bk wrote: » Keep in mind that is offpeak frequency at 12pm weekdays. It increases to a 10 minute frequency at peak times.
tom1ie wrote: » On right I didn’t spot that! Well if that’s delivered it’ll be very impressive. Where does it say that? I only scanned the document this morning. I’ll have a closer look later.