eviltwin wrote: » Unless you are tagging yourself as being at a particular wedding I can't see the problem. It's totally unreasonable to tell guests they can't post photos of themselves to their own account.
meeeeh wrote: » You are entitled to it, it would be just a bit self centred if you did it despite request. The couple might not want to advertise where their wedding was especially if it was more pricey venue or something similar.
dinnyhw wrote: » Thanks for all your replies. It's certainly not something I am obsessing about and has nothing to do with being precious about approving pictures etc. I have no problem with guests posting pictures of themselves on the day. This is my second time round. My first marriage break up was extremely painful and bitter. So like a previous poster mentioned, I don't want to attract the attention of ghosts of the past.
wexie wrote: » Have a look through your SM account(s), at the very least you should be able to stop people tagging you in pictures (should the need arise) which will help with them gaining visibility.
DaeryssaOne wrote: » As I said earlier, I have never been at a wedding where the guests were asked not to upload any pictures at all. If asked to specifically not include details of the venue etc I wouldn't but would consider that to be the self-centred thing, like how important do you think you are that my friends would look at where I had been for a wedding and immediately jump to the expense of the venue?
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » 99 percent of the time it's because of bridezillaism.
meeeeh wrote: » They can post photos of themselves I'm not bothered by it but for example I have friends who wouldn't want drunken photos of them to surface on social media. It could affect their business and as such I would much rather see less photos from the wedding on social media so everyone can relax. What photos people take before or after is their own business.
ARNOLD J RIMMER wrote: » Is a wedding not a private event where guests are invited?
splinter65 wrote: » Weddings are public events by law.
splinter65 wrote: » What seems to be popular is if the B&G set up a special closed Facebook group for wedding guests only and all the pics are posted there. Details of the Facebook page are included on the invite.
dinnyhw wrote: » Yes, the closed group is certainly something I will consider. I know that some will probably still be posted, but would just like to minimise it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Wabbit Ears wrote: » You can ask but no-one is under any sort of obligation to respect those wishes.
....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
dinnyhw wrote: » Getting married next year and would prefer if pictures of our wedding were not shared on social media. I have social media accounts, but don't post personal stuff. My other half is not on social media at all and really dislikes it. We have been at two weddings in the last year where the couples asked for photos not to be shared, but their request was ignored. One couple had it on the invitation the others had a sign at the entrance to the church. Anyone any tips on how to manage this? I know it's not something we can have total control over and some may just go ahead and post them anyway, but would like to keep it to a minimum if possible!