facehugger99 wrote: » Most recent weddings I've been to, the wedding couple already have children and obviously their kids are involved in the day as they should be. I think it's quite nice to see children at a wedding. I guess it depends how you see a wedding. For me they are family celebrations but some people seem to view them as a multi-day piss-up - wouldn't be my scene.
Patww79 wrote: » Read it again. I'll give you a clue, the word starts with O and ends with Y.
c.p.w.g.w wrote: » The amount some people spend is shocking, that could be money to pay off the mortgage early, cover kids uniforms and books for their entire school live. A few foreign holidays
flandabieduzie wrote: » This thread sums up why I don't want to get married. And I'm not referring to the finances!
Phoenix Stale Viking wrote: » Cash gifts cover a large amount of the cost though so it costs the couple much less than the headline number.
duffman13 wrote: » . I've always had the mindset of cover my plate but lots of people see it as an (almost) free meal
duffman13 wrote: » This overblown, my sister got married recently and made less than 2k in cash from 100 guests. Some of the gifts she got were worth feck all. I've always had the mindset of cover my plate but lots of people see it as an (almost) free meal
_Dara_ wrote: » Seeing as weddings are usually expensive to attend even without the gift, I doubt anyone is going out if their way to get a “free” carvery meal.
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
umop episdn wrote: » ....and drunken twats falling over themselves, groping waitresses and puking I the corner just aren't my type of people... but you go right ahead and enjoy yourself
iamwhoiam wrote: » " made cash " ? Its not a business in my opinion and a gift is a bonus and people are kind to do that . But maybe thats just our family ?
duffman13 wrote: » Im not arguing they are expensive to attend, of course they are. I've only ever gone to weddings of people who I had an interest in and had a strong relationship. Also carvery meal? I've been to a lot of weddings recently and I've probably had one bad meal that was disappointing. The rest were very good restaurant quality food. Each to their own but I can't agree that it's carvery standard
_Dara_ wrote: » Carvery is probably a slight exaggeration but the food is mass-catering. It’s not restaurant standard either and certainly nothing you’d go out of your way for. For the per head price, the equivalent at a good mid-range restaurant would be much higher. For example, if you go for a fish course at a wedding, it’s very difficult to ensure that fish won’t be overcooked.