Overheal wrote: » If he goes, Pence is sworn in. Simple as that. The odds of them both going at once are cosmic. Even if Pence is legally implicated in a Trump cluster**** he would still incur his own impeachment proceeding. If Pence lost such proceedings, Paul Ryan is sworn in as the next in succession to the Presidency as he is the House Speaker.
mattser wrote: » Yes please.
StringerBell wrote: » What does choice have to do with it? When Trump leaves office it will either be Mike Pence due to him being forced out/resigning or an as yet unnamed Democrat who beats him in 2020, or 2024. Its not like debating who you want to take over your sports team if the manager goes. Would you like to discuss viable options for right now? As in, if Trump goes tomorrow or what?[/QUOTE] Yes please.
mattser wrote: » Just as a matter of interest, when President Trump leaves office, who is your choice as his successor ? ( Addressed to everybody, really )
Itssoeasy wrote: » An inanimate carbon rod will be fine for me.
relax carry on wrote: So anyway after a year and a half or so of Trump, where exactly is America on the world stage now. How goes Trumps Make America Great Again campaign? All I can see reported is damaged international relationships with long standing allies, new questionable relationships with long standing enemies, a looming international trade war, the rise of autocratic/fascist/racist tendancies/beliefs/actions in the US and the disintegration of verifiable media and fact based discussion. So where exactly are we now with Trump and what exactly is his end game if he actually has one?
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Trump - A politician that does what he says he will do.
Nox wrote: » I am assuming that you are not an American ....,,.]
Overheal wrote: » Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her party of 7 were removed from an eatery in Lexington last night called the Red Hen. The owner cited his strong moral convictions in refusing to serve her. Naturally, Trump supporters who pride themselves on political incorrectness and the ability to refuse hardware and wedding cake access to gays took this news on the chin - leaping on review sites like Yelp and spamming bad reviews of which included onerous claims like the restaurant cooked and served baby parts. Naturally, liberals were mocked for being intolerant and outlandish claims that businesses have no right to refuse service, with no sense of irony whatsoever.
Leroy42 wrote: » Mexico paying for the wall? Chinese a currency manipulator? Drain the swamp? Repeal and replace Obamacare? I get it that we all focus on the positives our whatever team we support, but that is such a blatantly untrue statement as to leave one with little credibility. Even Trumps biggest critic would accept that he boggest achievement is getting people to believe what he says, no matter how often he changes what he means.
Carry wrote: » Nox wrote: » Your idiotic trolling is beginning to bore me. Since it is still Saturday, I suggest you go to the Pub/beer joint (whatever they call it in your part of the woods) and tip a few. Have a nice evening. It's pub, in our part of a civilised country. And Saturday has nothing to do with it. We go any time. And if you are bored you are free to debate with more interesting people in "your part of the woods". Nox wrote: » I am assuming that you are not an American so the phrase 'more bother' is slightly beyond me. Does it mean 'more trouble'? Did it occur to you that this is an Irish discussion board? As in Ireland, Europe? Learn the language if you want to keep up. And please stop hollering in bold, big script. This is not hillbilly country. As for the Time cover: Symbolism is a strong way to communicate an issue that otherwise is lost on more, let's say, simple minds. It's an art form. Your attempts to distract from the issue by desperately digging for something that diminishes it, because in your mind your country, your hero DT can do no wrong, is just sad. SAD! And finally, calling comments silly, stupid, boring, idiotic isn't exactly a way to make your own arguments more credible. So do you have anything to offer regarding questions and debate points made on this thread? I didn't think so.
Nox wrote: » Your idiotic trolling is beginning to bore me. Since it is still Saturday, I suggest you go to the Pub/beer joint (whatever they call it in your part of the woods) and tip a few. Have a nice evening.
Nox wrote: » I am assuming that you are not an American so the phrase 'more bother' is slightly beyond me. Does it mean 'more trouble'?
strandroad wrote: » I'm as anti Trump as they come but this was unnecessary. She was just there to eat and she behaved like a vanilla punter. It will now be dragged out any time a bigoted business runs out gays etc.
Corkblowin wrote: » Nox wrote: » … there is no punishment for the rumor spreaders should the rumors prove false. Just as well - DJT would be in even more bother
Nox wrote: » … there is no punishment for the rumor spreaders should the rumors prove false.
Leroy42 wrote: » Nox wrote: » You might want to reread what I wrote about getting the full story on the cover of Time magazine. The picture on the cover is photo-shopped to justify an agenda. The girl was not 'ripped' from her mother. The girl was ALWAYS with her mother. The girls mother had previously been deported. The rest of your tripe is put in to obfuscate what I said. You might consider taking a reading comprehension course. This is what you originally posted What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on. I am asking you what you think the has been convoluted and clouded the real story. I asked you which part of the media narrative you disagreed with. You failed to answer any of it. So I ask again, if the story is not as being reported then why do you think Trump crumbled under the pressure? Is he so weak that in the face of such lies he simply gives in on a key plank of his administrations policy. That he was so quick to turn his back on all those people that are being effected by such terrible rates of crime. So which is it. Is the story made up and Trump has been shown as a pathetically weak leader or is the story true, and Trump has been shown to be totally wrong in his judgement? What is it that is really going on? It has already been explained to you that the picture is not the real issue, it presents the situation. You do realise that there is not actually going to be a picture of Trump standing beside one of the children locked in the camps? And remember this quote from SHS "Whether it's a real video, the threat is real," she said, and the president's "goal is to promote strong border security and strong national security." Can you give your version of the story and how it has been clouded?
Nox wrote: » You might want to reread what I wrote about getting the full story on the cover of Time magazine. The picture on the cover is photo-shopped to justify an agenda. The girl was not 'ripped' from her mother. The girl was ALWAYS with her mother. The girls mother had previously been deported. The rest of your tripe is put in to obfuscate what I said. You might consider taking a reading comprehension course.
What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on.
"Whether it's a real video, the threat is real," she said, and the president's "goal is to promote strong border security and strong national security."
Overheal wrote: » Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her party of 7 were removed from an eatery in Lexington last night called the Red Hen. The owner cited his strong moral convictions in refusing to serve her.
Captain Obvious wrote: » The Time cover never mentioned the policy. It says "Welcome to America". This is a photo of a girl who was stopped with her family crying while they were being detained. The photo is completely appropriate and correct in that context. Not sure what the issue is over it.
