spacecoyote wrote: » http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/393581-rhode-island-bill-would-keep-trump-off-2020-ballot-unless-he-filed-his Interesting one. A Rhode island bill has been put forward stating that no candidate may be put on a ballot without releasing 5 years of tax returns. Can't see trumpy being too happy about that!!!
dpd666 wrote: » Captain Obvious wrote: » Sure. So are you saying that is factually inaccurate ? The FBI and crime statistics don't lie. As a black person in a black neighbourhood I would be more worried about being shot or assaulted by a fellow black person than some random white guy.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Sure.
20Cent wrote: » Here's a video of trump holding up a photo of a murder victim which he has autographed and jokes about the guys looks.https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1010238401549873164?s=19
mattser wrote: » Can you translate that into English, please?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » lol. How the hell could it be incidental? It's outright propaganda. Ah yes, invoke Hitler and the Nazis. The image is suggesting that Trump is responsible for something he is not. If someone had done this in the Obama campaign, liberals would have been up in arms, asking if the family gave permission for the child's image to be used, along with the usual sanctimonious hand wringing. This isn't the only example of this in recent times either. Photos of children in enclosed cages were circulated recently as an example of Trump's 'cruel policies towards immigrants' but the images were in fact from 2014. Getting desperate of late. Barrel scraping is never a good look.
Nox wrote: » What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on.
UsedToWait wrote: » Tom Arnold trolling the sh1t out of Trump on CNN. Apparently he's making a documentary with Michael Cohen. Says Trump has disrespected Cohen and his family. Saying he has the full story, tapes and all and addressing Trump directly to camera - "I'm spending the weekend with Michael Cohen. Hope you and Ivanka can sleep tonight".. Grade A trolling if nothing else, but hopefully an indication that Cohen has flipped. Edit:http://uk.businessinsider.com/michael-cohen-tom-arnold-trump-tapes-2018-6?r=US&IR=T
Nox wrote: » Hmmm … a totally blue state. I'm sure President Donald J Trump will consider suicide because of it.
Nox wrote: » Leroy42 wrote: » Are you really saying Nox that you couldn't envisage children without their parents crying without being done on purpose? Seriously, that you would need to be in that situation to see if it was possible. You don't need to assume anything. We know that children are heavily reliant on having the knowledge that their parent is close by. Even when playing they will look occassionally to ensure that the parent is still around. And that they become panicked and scared when lost. Have you never witnessed a child separated from its parent in a shopping centre? It is simply not credible for you to claim any of that. The only conclusion is that you are avoiding admitting it as it doesn't suit the narrative you are trying to state. What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on.
Leroy42 wrote: » Are you really saying Nox that you couldn't envisage children without their parents crying without being done on purpose? Seriously, that you would need to be in that situation to see if it was possible. You don't need to assume anything. We know that children are heavily reliant on having the knowledge that their parent is close by. Even when playing they will look occassionally to ensure that the parent is still around. And that they become panicked and scared when lost. Have you never witnessed a child separated from its parent in a shopping centre? It is simply not credible for you to claim any of that. The only conclusion is that you are avoiding admitting it as it doesn't suit the narrative you are trying to state.
Leroy42 wrote: » Nox wrote: » Leroy42 wrote: » Are you really saying Nox that you couldn't envisage children without their parents crying without being done on purpose? Seriously, that you would need to be in that situation to see if it was possible. You don't need to assume anything. We know that children are heavily reliant on having the knowledge that their parent is close by. Even when playing they will look occassionally to ensure that the parent is still around. And that they become panicked and scared when lost. Have you never witnessed a child separated from its parent in a shopping centre? It is simply not credible for you to claim any of that. The only conclusion is that you are avoiding admitting it as it doesn't suit the narrative you are trying to state. What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on. So you think the story is made up or exaggerated? Which part? That children were taken away from their parents? That they were put in camps? That they cried because they were scared and alone? Because if you really do believe its all fake news, then why did Trump buckle under the pressure and give in? He even went as far as having a PR signing of an EO to sort out a made up problem. Thats your position?
Nox wrote: » You might want to reread what I wrote about getting the full story on the cover of Time magazine. The picture on the cover is photo-shopped to justify an agenda. The girl was not 'ripped' from her mother. The girl was ALWAYS with her mother. The girls mother had previously been deported. The rest of your post is absolutely spot on
everlast75 wrote: » So there are numerous rumours that in the Cohen's tapes, DJT uses the n word reportedly. Speculating here, what do you think the political reaction to that would be? Explosive, or barely a blip.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » But it's just more fuel for Trump and his base with the theme that their is a fake news conspiarcy out there to get him. Surely they could have done better than that.
Nox wrote: » Do you remember the Jesse Jackson speech about 'Big Bad Brother'? Even the "civil rights" leaders agree with you.
Nox wrote: » You might want to reread what I wrote about getting the full story on the cover of Time magazine. The picture on the cover is photo-shopped to justify an agenda. The girl was not 'ripped' from her mother. The girl was ALWAYS with her mother. The girls mother had previously been deported. The rest of your tripe is put in to obfuscate what I said. You might consider taking a reading comprehension course.
Hande hoche! wrote: » Now I feel bad for Tom Arnold.https://twitter.com/MichaelCohen212/status/1010318675751120896
20Cent wrote: » Gas. Being more outraged about a photo than this heartless policy.
B0jangles wrote: » It almost feels like when a police team are trying to prosecute a gang of criminals - the police have to dot every i, cross every t and never ever do anything that could be construed as cutting corners in the process of building a case for fear of destroying the whole thing, whereas the criminals can do whatever the hell they like to avoid being caught because they are fecking criminals and that's just what they do - this latest kefuffle over the Time magazine cover is an example of what I mean. The standard of behaviour expected of Trump and the GOP is laughably, ridiculously lower than that expected of the mainstream media.
What you need is the full story behind the Time magazine cover. The media is so convoluting this story that it is clouding what is really going on.
"Whether it's a real video, the threat is real," she said, and the president's "goal is to promote strong border security and strong national security."
