inforfun wrote: » https://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7457835/0fed39b4/gestolen_truck_crasht.html Now this is a bit special to catch on your dashcam.
bladespin wrote: » From this morning.
Ivefoundgod wrote: » That in Ballymount? Down past TV3?
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
inforfun wrote: » https://i.imgur.com/eyCSUXd.mp4
fritzelly wrote: » Maybe vision impairment - apart from that no clue
Isambard wrote: » Neck injury making it uncomfortable to turn his head too far?
Patww79 wrote: » They're just a ****ing idiot I'd wager.
bladespin wrote: » Bloody cyclists!
fancy pigeon wrote: » Okay, genuine question... Vid below, man takes a massive swing out at this junction. He does this every time Visibility is fantastic both sides, the bridge has plenty of time away from the junction and the other side is a straight. Junction is very wide and driver friendly, whilst this just restricts vision to the left in my eyes! Unless a Picmyasso is difficult to manouvere and the driver needs to be a swing out sister... Genuinely, am I missing something obvious? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFznpUajnt0
fancy pigeon wrote: » Okay, genuine question... Vid below, man takes a massive swing out at this junction. He does this every time Visibility is fantastic both sides, the bridge has plenty of time away from the junction and the other side is a straight. Junction is very wide and driver friendly, whilst this just restricts vision to the left in my eyes! Unless a Picmyasso is difficult to manouvere and the driver needs to be a swing out sister... Genuinely, am I missing something obvious?
mikeymouse wrote: » might make a bit more sense when you look at the road layout off to their left? But still a bit exaggerated . That and the late indicate would pee me off too.
Mr Snow wrote: »