eagle eye wrote: » Just on Trump's intelligence. A number of years ago, maybe 10 or 12 he was on the WWE as it is known these days. He started out as a heel(bad guy) and then turned into the enemy of the owner Vince McMahon who was a heel which made him a great guy. I heard about it and became intrigued as to why Trump was doing this. It ended up being billed the battle of the billionaires. He was getting to stroke his ego for sure with this but I felt there had to be something more to it. During the election I wondered to myself if this was a long running grand plan. I believe it was because a lot of the electorate he was appealing to in the election would be similar types to the adults who attend WWE events. They are not very smart and a lot of them are what I'd call hicks. He learned how to appeal to them while performing an act on WWE. It's funny and it's also very smart.
ELM327 wrote: » Trump was winning the election before that in the polls. But I do agree, the deplorables comment was one of the things that turned the tide to a Trump victory. Well he isnt. There's no metric that measures that. The only metric is re-election in 2020. And possibly a nobel peace prize if the deal in N Korea comes through. If Mr Hussein Obama was in the running for one, DT must be a dead cert for sure.
jooksavage wrote: » The solipsism is strong with anyone who can argue with a straight face that growing up in a first world country with all its attendant benefits isn't a privilege. We're living through an unprecedented period of peace in a western democracy. By any historical and geo-political standards we're the trust fund douchebags who don't know how good we have it.
20Cent wrote: » Was wondering why people were making a big deal about his seperate but equal comment looked it up. Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law according to which racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted Ffs.
ELM327 wrote: » If Mr Hussein Obama was in the running for one, DT must be a dead cert for sure.
pixelburp wrote: » When your opponent basically gives you an open goal by calling your voting base "a basket of deplorables" - a base that you yourself had already stoked into an anti-Establishment frenzy - then yes, luck had a big part in Trumps campaign. A campaign that never bothered writing a Transition plan either, and necessitated that farcical horse-trading in Trump Tower around Christmas '17. Since then he has shown no attempt to reach across to the rest of America that doesn't constitute his base. Trump inherited a great deal of his wealth, and many business ideas by him have fallen flat on their face; be it Trump Steaks, Trump Airlines, Trump Multimedia, Trump Magazone, his attempt at starting a rival to the NFL, the list goes on. Honestly? No I question Trump's business acumen and had he not the solid, reliable Manhattan real-estate as backup, it's entirely debatable whether he'd still be in a position of wealth today. He's the quintessential relic of old-world business. On a side note: by your logic, would you consider George W. Bush an intelligent man? By your thinking US Presidents are intelligent by dint of their success.
Billy Mays wrote: » Spot on Except as president he's actually expected to give a crap about the rest and not just the people like you who support him
ELM327 wrote: » Im', not losing, the' run of, myself, anywhere Trump is a smart politician. He's playing to his audience and couldn't give a crap about the rest. I am optimistic that should he choose to run in 2020 that he will be re-elected. And that is his aim.
ELM327 wrote: » Trump is the most powerful man on the planet. No one "lucks in" to getting into the position of ruler of the free world. Whatever you may dislike about the man, you cannot doubt his intelligence.
Water John wrote: » Don't doubt his intelligence, at all. Know well, the level it's at, esp his, emotional intelligence.
listermint wrote: » Its quite clear to be now that you were a member of the UCD comedic society. As no one that academically gifted or graduated from UCD would believe such a claim. Top drawer though, you nearly had me.
Water John wrote: » ELM, your'e sort of losing, the run of yourself , there. For example, the fee for third level, isn't remotely near, its cost. The paradox is, if DT was totally successful in closing the border and expelling all undocumented the American economy would be quite negatively affected.
listermint wrote: » I have with no doubt that you would not have the standard of living you enjoy today perhaps not even the internet should you have lotteried your life into a family in Guam , Peru, Syria. But you will never admit how privileged you are, such is the nature of those that cant see what is right in front of them. Anyway ive enough of pointing out the obvious to those that choose not to see. Way off topic here, Trump is still an idiot nearly 2 years later and his policies reflect everything that is dirty about Modern Society. They encompass it and they give license to those people to come out from rocks that agree with them. Hopefully we learn as a species someday, I'll be long gone by then.
ELM327 wrote: » I didn't know UCD offered second level education? Privileged to be academically gifted. Nothing to do with location or any other privilege you care to throw at it.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Our direct provision system would be fine if people were not stuck in it for so long.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Ignorance is the word alright. Seems you don't know how much of your education was provided by the taxpayer.
ELM327 wrote: » I think your feigned ignorance speaks volumes. I did not benefit from free education. Primary schools have "voluntary" contributions of a few hundred per year. I attended a private secondary school having earned a 100% bursary for academic prowess. So no cost to the state there at all. 3rd level is not free, you pay between 80-100% of most normal courses through the "registration fees" that regularly top 3-4k. The rest of your post is a dangerous equilibrium comprised of bunkum, socialism, and SJW. To which any response that I should proffer would likely be cannibalised with risible tripe along the lines of "WHITE PRIVILEGE" "THINK OF DE BABBIES" etc. So I shall save us both the bother. I can but be thankful that our little land of milk and honey has not been defiled like central and southern Europe has. Although the Nordics (particularly Sweden) are now also showing the issues associated with free and simple immigration. We should be aligning with past generations and, to borrow a leaf from a well known leader's book of quotable notables, "We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." Instead we open our doors, and share our meagre wealth with those who plot to kill us, wreck our societal model, rape our women, brainwash our children, etc.
VinLieger wrote: » Non EU citizens are charged anywhere from 18k - 25k for UCD, that is the actual cost of a course removing all EU and Irish government subsidies that you don't pay. Thinking the 3-4k registration fee you paid is anywhere close to being 100% of the actual cost of a course is delusional.
VinLieger wrote: » Also attending private secondary education regardless of how it was paid for does indeed make you very damned privileged.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » Our Direct Provision system could be amended and improved, there's no doubt about that. But we're not impinging upon basic human rights like the US are here.
ELM327 wrote: » I did not benefit from free education. Primary schools have "voluntary" contributions of a few hundred per year. I attended a private secondary school having earned a 100% bursary for academic prowess. So no cost to the state there at all. 3rd level is not free, you pay between 80-100% of most normal courses through the "registration fees" that regularly top 3-4k.