DickSwiveller wrote: » Given that Obama got it for nothing, should Trump now be awarded the Peace Prize on account of the great work he's done tempering little Rocket Man?
Sonics2k wrote: » Sure, Kim finally backed down and agreed to the meeting because of Trump, but that's only out of survival because we all know Trump is mental enough to actually blow up North Korea.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » You mean giving Kim Jong-un what he wanted and getting nothing in return? Great work that was, alright.
DickSwiveller wrote: » Oh come on Anchapaill. Surely a denuclearised North Korea is good for everyone.
Hande hoche! wrote: » If the end result is a Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons, he may be a strong candidate.
Sonics2k wrote: » Yup, never mind the mass starvation, imprisonment, slavery and all the other atrocities that happen in North Korea, so long as aul Kimmy stops -trying- to build a missile.
Danzy wrote: » He deserves consideration and is as viable a pick as many who have received it. Nice to have a a U.S. President who Is not always bomb,bomb,bomb. A change is welcome,the Peace President, relatively speaking.
Under Trump, the United States has dropped about 20,650 bombs through July 31, or 80 percent the number dropped under Obama for the entirety of 2016. At this rate, Trump will exceed Obama’s last-year total by Labor Day.
Danzy wrote: » The only thing to change that is an invasion, will your lordship be first in to battle?
kneemos wrote: » Apparently they have had a long term plan for modernisation for quite a while.
Sonics2k wrote: » The meeting between N. Korea and S. Korea is the result of years of negotiations between both countries, Swedish ambassadors, China.