stuartkee wrote: » Have i just looked into Nest and Ring and you get what you pay for. Access is free for 30 days and then you can view for free after 30 days of sign up for monthly charges. $ 5 for 5 day play back etc. Ring is the same 4 $ 3 for 60 day play back single came $10 for multiple cameras.
stuartkee wrote: » Yale is a DIY alarm and not a graded EN insurance graded system. For what i have been told Abloy want to interrogate a Graded Alarm into Smart home and Smart door release control.
stuartkee wrote: » Maybe Free Wi-Fi conection but paid for back up like above. ( Yes i know , one is data storage the other is GSM connectivity) But you get my drift.
kub wrote: I can't see that happening, that App is head and shoulders above anything else available. You get what you pay for. HKC are head and shoulders above every other manufacturer in the quality of their products, their dependability and their back up service. Little wonder an International company of the calibre that Assa Abloy are came and bought them.
bk wrote: » What?! The app is nothing special from what I see, quiet old fashioned in terms of apps for modern security systems. Just go and take a look at Nests app or ADT SmartThings app or if you want a more installer oriented panels, the apps that come with DSC iotega or Honeywell Lyric apps. Hell even Yales app is superior. Huh, Yale (owned by Assa Alboy) security systems come with free monitoring and free app and you can be sure that Yales systems sell a hell of a lot more then HKC. I think it is naive to think HKC's business model will continue to thrive with the likes of Google Nest, Amazon Ring, ADT SmartThings, etc. all bringing security systems to the market with free apps and monitoring. HKC seem to make very good quality hardware. But they definitely choose the wrong path with their monitoring, just like Climote did. I think they knew that their business model doesn't have a future and that is why they have sold out to Assa Alboy. I hope with them joining Assa there will be a healthy exchange and sharing of tech between their companies. Yale gaining HKC sensors and HKC gaining Yales better app and free monitoring and likely the servers behind that. Would make for great products, each targeting their respective markets.
kub wrote: » I can't see that happening, that App is head and shoulders above anything else available.
stuartkee wrote: » Can i ask you a question . Why did Assa Abloy want to buy HKC ? Is it that thye provide Free self monitoring ? Is it because they have a business model that works and is profitable ?
KoolKid wrote: » I think we have been seeing some nice balance in this thread recently. Is everyone questioning HKC driven by hatred??? There's also a lot of people questioning on the FB page as you know. Will you be accusing all them of hatred. �� HKC, GSD, Vanderbilt, UTC etc are all just company's not people. I find it strange that you take any criticism of a company so personally and accuse people of hate because they choose to look at alternative options in the market. Anyway I suppose that is just an example of how some people push the product they want to use. As for the free options vs paid.. All those on the free service weren't affected by a second major outage the other day. My phone wasn't hopping all day with irate customers wondering why their alarms were not communicating. I'd say that was scary for some if this happened after an alarm event. Even scarier if it was a monitored system that went without a response. The thing about duel path communication that is being sold to customers is that it's still going through a single path that is the services like Securecom. Anyway, it's good to see all these issues being raised. It gives posters a good view of both sides of the differences between these services.
KoolKid wrote: I think we have been seeing some nice balance in this thread recently. Is everyone questioning HKC driven by hatred??? There's also a lot of people questioning on the FB page as you know. Will you be accusing all them of hatred. 😕 HKC, GSD, Vanderbilt, UTC etc are all just company's not people. I find it strange that you take any criticism of a company so personally and accuse people of hate because they choose to look at alternative options in the market. Anyway I suppose that is just an example of how some people push the product they want to use. As for the free options vs paid.. All those on the free service weren't affected by a second major outage the other day. My phone wasn't hopping all day with irate customers wondering why their alarms were not communicating. I'd say that was scary for some if this happened after an alarm event. Even scarier if it was a monitored system that went without a response. The thing about duel path communication that is being sold to customers is that it's still going through a single path that is the services like Securecom. Anyway, it's good to see all these issues being raised. It gives posters a good view of both sides of the differences between these services.
KoolKid wrote: There are a lot of installers that would argue with you there after 2 major outages on Securecom in so many weeks. Certainly a good reason for them to increase their poll fail notifications down from 5 hours. I really don't understand this when the numerous free services offer 5 minutes or less.
davidconroy46 wrote: Hkc needed that sell out, not know to much outside Ireland.big company who makes yale etc, should make the buy over work well. Hopefully the way the market has gone they might do away with the payn app and yearly fee.
Drifter50 wrote: » Unusual move for ASSA Abloy, they have only just finished disentangling themselves from the Securitas Group. However it looks like they were maybe looking for a new direction or opportunity.
Drifter50 wrote: » My slant on this is different from some of you guys. Its been clear for some time that HKC had gone as far as they could in Ireland and could`nt get anymore substantial growth in Ireland. They have failed to crack the UK market so far and they need to grow to evolve so I guess that ASSA Abloy see the opportunity in the UK market and thats where they are going to focus. As a result they will leave Ireland alone as such but it will be interesting to see if they rebrand the name.
Drifter50 wrote: » Don`t see them going downwards to the DIY stores tho
kub wrote: » Overall the general consensus is this is great development for HKC, from installers and staff there. No doubt integration with home automation is the future and it is great that we have a quality Irish manufacturer being taken over by a quality International manufacturer with plenty of experience in future technologies.
kub wrote: » Good informative post, thank you. I reckon though that the reason Assa Abloy are not available in general retail here probably has more to do with the cost of their equipment, stuff Joe Soap would never purchase. One that comes to mind to me is the cost of one of their electric locks, you would have a dozen mag locks for the same price. Hence they are only available in trade suppliers, for guys who know what they want or what has been specified for a job.
kub wrote: » Great to hear that Yale have made in roads to home automation, that technology hopefully will be brought over to HKC's portfolio in the long run.
kub wrote: » Yes I know Yale are available as a brand in the retailers as previously mentioned. My question is, is the Assa Abloy brand also available in these retailers also?
bk wrote: Yale? Everywhere, including their alarm systems, CCTV systems, locks, etc.
KoolKid wrote: » Thats what I thought. Those fancy end user packaging might be making sense now. Might be seeing those panels on the shelves of B&Q and Homebase.
kub wrote: » Are Abloy Assa locks available in such places?
bk wrote: » That is interesting, so the same company who owns Yale and their security systems.