thebull85 wrote: » Stupid comment from you i must say. There are plenty of dark skinned people involved in the protest. The police are getting attacked because they are the police.
skooterblue2 wrote: » https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/feb/20/rotherham-sexual-abuse-victims-rises-to-1510-operation-stovewood Now that is not Brietbart or Infowars...... over 1500 abductions and rapes are not a problem? Guess that isnt covered by "Me too!" ?
FingerDeKat wrote: » With the carry on of those EDL scum earlier kinda shows up the Irish cockroaches to be full of pi$$ and vinegar. I suppose we can be thankful they just pollute Irish forums.
Captain Obvious wrote: » I'm not surprised you ignored the rest of the post. But to quash your surprise I will spell it out to you like I would a child learning how questions and answers work. The question was am I suggesting it is not a problem. My answer was "nope" as in "nope I am not suggesting it is not a problem".
Captain Obvious wrote: » They probably saw a dark skinned copper and lost it.
skooterblue2 wrote: » You got me there....... you heard it here first, child abuse isnt a problem, carry on as you were Anjem. Lets ignore all the report and the victims.
Billy Mays wrote: » Traffic cones today, plastic furniture when the world cup starts
Captain Obvious wrote: » Nope.
skooterblue2 wrote: » I believe it is high lighting a topic that is very serious and the Home Office/ Police and Politicians are ignoring and when caught letting the offenders off.
skooterblue2 wrote: » Are you suggesting that child abuse isnt a problem in Northern England?
skooterblue2 wrote: » I believe it is high lighting a topic that is very serious and the Home Office/ Police and Politicians are ignoring and when caught letting the offenders off. Are you suggesting that child abuse isnt a problem in Northern England?
Taytoland wrote: » Seeing their own land polluted with Islamic fascists, Islamic terrorists, calls for Sharia law, Islamic grooming rape gangs and so on. So yes, I'd be protesting that.
Taytoland wrote: » I don't blame them. If I was surrounded by Islamic terrorists I'd be protesting too.
pitifulgod wrote: » DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » You don't care either. What did you do about it? You don't give a damn. That's a pretty big assumption. I imagine like most intelligent human beings, they support the reporting and conviction of such crimes. Just to expand on that a bit, I don't support labeling an entire Muslim community because of it. I also don't think people like Tommy should be able to have a get out of jail free card for ignoring court orders. I really don't think Tommy gives a **** about anyone, he put his youtube hits above protecting minors in the case. His supporter's behaviour today does a great job of illustrating the type of people he appeals to though. Taytoland wrote: » I don't blame them. If I was surrounded by Islamic terrorists I'd be protesting too. You'd be behaving like a football hooligan? They're not surrounded by 'Islamic terrorists' btw.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » You don't care either. What did you do about it? You don't give a damn.
Captain Obvious wrote: » So are you condoning the actions of the people in the video? You believe their actions will fix the issue of child abuse?
skooterblue2 wrote: » Different People, same organisation. Cover up and hide the offenders and prosecute those who uphold the law.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Same coppers in the video is it?
Captain Obvious wrote: » Was the terrorist in the horse box?
pitifulgod wrote: » That's a pretty big assumption. I imagine like most intelligent human beings, they support the reporting and conviction of such crimes. Just to expand on that a bit, I don't support labeling an entire Muslim community because of it. I also don't think people like Tommy should be able to have a get out of jail free card for ignoring court orders. I really don't think Tommy gives a **** about anyone, he put his youtube hits above protecting minors in the case. His supporter's behaviour today does a great job of illustrating the type of people he appeals to though.
skooterblue2 wrote: » Do you mean those crooked cops who covered up Rotherham, Telford, Stafford ....... along with Labour politicians? Where were the police?