CeilingFly wrote: » What's your expertise in roads engineering? I'll guess little or none. As for aping Britain, there are tons of roundabouts all round Europe and they are particularly prevalent in France - and WAY more than the UK
Sam Russell wrote: » At the end of every new stretch of motorway is a roundabout. Just look at the M17 as it traansitions into the Tuam bypass - a roundabout. Why was that not built as a free-flow junction? First job when extending a motorway to add a few extra miles to it - is to remove the roundabout at the end of the existing motorway. We should think free-flow.
JupiterKid wrote: » I have a background in transportation and land use planning so I do know something about roads and transport issues. I’ll care for you not to patronise me and condescend to me. I am entitled to my opinion. And my opinion is that too many roundabouts were built at junctions where they did not work well in this country. Attack the post and not the poster.
Geogregor wrote: » One of the reasons for such solutions might be to slow traffic down from the motorway speeds at the end of the motorway. From safety perspective it is wise idea, even if it adds to work when motorway is eventually extended.
Sam Russell wrote: » Well, slowing from 120 kph to 100 kph does not require a roundabout. There is no roundabout at the end on the M4 coming into Dublin, when the slow down is to 80 kph, so not a universal idea.
BuzzFish wrote: » Took a few pics from KerryGroup late last week....
pad199207 wrote: » It’s really beginning to make excellent progress now.
marno21 wrote: » Good weather is really helping (not just here but on jobs nationwide!) The demolition of that bridge is surely only around the corner.
Redsoxfan wrote: » Couple of Dutch artic trucks delivering something at the Sallins bypass works this morning.
D Trent wrote: » Must be flowers. You know, keep the boys on side..
[Deleted User] wrote: » More likely Dutch Gold!
gilly2308 wrote: I actually hadn't been on the M7 for the last two months, but drove to Newbridge last Saturday. Maybe it's just me, but it looks like very little has happened since I was last on the M7, although maybe those who are on it every day can tell me differently?
gilly2308 wrote: » I actually hadn't been on the M7 for the last two months, but drove to Newbridge last Saturday. Maybe it's just me, but it looks like very little has happened since I was last on the M7, although maybe those who are on it every day can tell me differently?
Be well and win wrote: » Seems to be have been a never ending drainage programme ongoing in the middle for the last few months. That phase finally seems to be coming to an end though and it looks like they are starting to cover them up. I'll be curious to see what the next work will be
benny79 wrote: » How does the drainage take so long? seriously they are only extending 1 junction long at the minute! Its not as if there was a road there already! There not be drainage there from the other 2 lanes?
benny79 wrote: » How does the drainage take so long? seriously they are only extending 1 junction long at the minute! Its not as if there was a road there already! There not be drainage there from the other 2 lanes? Plus they extended the whole of the Naas road in the same time that was 9 junctions long! I know the ryder cup was a big factor but still... Im only talking about the lanes not all the new junction layouts obviously they will take time! Dreading when the schools go back road will be a nightmare again..
CeilingFly wrote: » And your experience of drainage systems and road engineering is???????? I just cannot understand the whining posts of some people - maybe ask for information of the drainage rather that do a whining post especially when you have zero experience in the field. There are plenty of experienced people on these threads, but they tend to respond to reasonable queries than a whine And you think that they can widen the road and then simply bolt on the two ne junctions later? Seriously?