Liamalone wrote: » The last bellybutton survey saw a dead heat, 50% inny, 50% outty.
Deleted User wrote: » I find that very hard to believe.
wexie wrote: » Who commissions/performs a bellybutton survey? And why?
Professor Moriarty wrote: » I did the survey. Spent every Saturday since Christmas stopping people in the street and asking to see their bellybuttons. Methodology a bit suspect as the sample was four participants (including me - I'm an innie) but the facts speak for themselves.
Are Am Eye wrote: » A useful report. It's a bit short though, you may need to fluff it out a bit.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » I've had a bellyful of it now and not many can stomach the findings.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Tullio De Mauro, an Italian linguist, has asserted that in 1861 only 2.5% of the population of Italy could speak Standard Italian.
Are Am Eye wrote: » You're just going to cut it loose like that?
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » This of course depends on what you mean by standard Italian, or standard language in general. If in 1861 there was a definition of standard Italian recently formulated then it is likely that most of the uneducated, or regional population didn't adhere to it. Which doesnt mean the population of Italy spoke thousands of totally different unintelligible languages, but that the version of the ( effectively) corrupted Latin they speak there had lots of dialects. Presumably most Italians understand and understood each other.
Fourier wrote: » Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » This of course depends on what you mean by standard Italian, or standard language in general. If in 1861 there was a definition of standard Italian recently formulated then it is likely that most of the uneducated, or regional population didn't adhere to it. Which doesnt mean the population of Italy spoke thousands of totally different unintelligible languages, but that the version of the ( effectively) corrupted Latin they speak there had lots of dialects. Presumably most Italians understand and understood each other. I know that Neapolitan isn't mutually comprehensible even today. I remember a colleague who had to switch to English to speak to Northern Italians. Reading the Wikipedia article and its links seems to say they generally aren't mutually comprehensible.
donegal. wrote: » T-Rex was closer in time to the invention of the iPhone than it was to the Stegosaurus .
JRant wrote: » But they were both in Jurassic Park...
Fourier wrote: » Napoleon wasn't fully fluent in French, having grown up speaking Corsican (very close to Standard Italian). His written French in particular was ambiguous and hard to understand. This was probably responsible for his loss at El Arish in Egypt, where the generals had difficulty understanding his orders. Source: The Campaigns of Napoleon, David G. Chandler
JRant wrote: » Cleopatra was closer in time to the invention of the iPhone than she was to the building of the great pyramid.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » T Rex isnt from the Jurassic period, it is from the cretaceous period that came after it.
VW 1 wrote: » Courtesy of Robert Schoch? Fascinating podcast.
Are Am Eye wrote: » T Rex was in Jurassic Park. As Jrant correctly said.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » No need for schoch. He isnt an egypotologist. plenty of real sources for the time she lived in.