kneemos wrote: » No choice in most areas.
One eyed Jack wrote: » There should absolutely be a separation of Church and State, but the problem with that is that the State simply cannot afford to build it's own schools, so it funds the education of children by outsourcing it through the patronage system. The Catholic Bishops of Ireland just happen to be the largest patron provider of education. It's up to people who want a secular education for their children to campaign for that, because the Government certainly has no intention of getting rid of the patronage system.
Donald Trump wrote: » That's complete discrimination. The state provides a per capita grant for each child of school going age. This grant follows the child If there are sufficient children attending an institution, the state will pay teaching salaries within limits - of course there are requirements as regards standards and curriculum etc. So the system is open and transparent from that end. If you don't want to support the continuation of your local religious school then don't send your child there. It isn't a conspiracy
Mutant z wrote: » The time has come to take control of schools away from the church the fact that over 90% of schools in this country are under the control of the catholic church is baffling considering Ireland is now a largely irreligious country which has moved away from the catholic church so why is its ethos still being forced on the majority of the population.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Most of the land used for school building was given to the church in trust for the provision of schools. The church owes the state hundreds of millions in redress for the clerical abuse settlements.
_Brian wrote: » That deal is done and dusted, a bad deal but we are bound to it. It was a terrible missed opportunity. The state just can’t start seize land, it must operate within set rules. CPO is really the best option.
Sonics2k wrote: » By all means, educate your children in Catholic schools. However, there should be a separation of Church and State, so the State (and taxpayer) should not fund religious ethos schools.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Then let them establish private schools for that purpose. The church shouldn't be funding the religious indoctrination of children and it certainly shouldn't be done in time that is being wasted in school and could be used for something that is genuinely useful like languages, math, arts, stem subjects or even sport. If people want a "choice" then give them the choice, right now we have a church controlled monopoly on primary and secondary education in this country and it's a disgrace in 2018.
Graces7 wrote: » There are many who want their children educated in a Catholic school google "ceist"
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Most of the land used for school building was given to the church in trust for the provision of schools. The church owes the state hundreds of millions in redress for the clerical abuse settlements. Just size the land national and secondary schools are built on and tell them we'll take the remainder in installments until they finally repay the victims of their abuse.
_Brian wrote: » I can’t understand why your baffled. It’s quite simple really. As the Irish state developed the church stepped in and got involved in developing schools, it shouldered much of the cost of school infrastructure. To this day they in many cases still retain ownership of the land schools are built on, the schools themselves are generally the property of the state. It’s often cited as the reason that the church retain some degree of control in schools - they are the site owners after all. I would suggest the solution is CPO, we regularly see farmers land being CPO’d for public infrastructure developments. In the same way these sites could be forcibly purchased from the church which would finally break any hold they have over schools. Truly there was a missed opportunity under the FF government when settlement for abuse cases was reached, a clause to include turning these lands over to the state should have been included and a cost neutral solution was missed.