nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Irish Economy at risk of overheating.

6541

The Irish Economy is at risk of overheating according to many news reports today. It is true the place has the feel of a boom, everywhere is busy, a lot more money around. What I can't get my head around is it is clear we have a housing shortage and I think the OECD are blaming housing, but how is that when we have a shortage of housing ? So how does overheating correlate to housing ?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Geuze

6541 wrote: »

The Irish Economy is at risk of overheating according to many news reports today. It is true the place has the feel of a boom, everywhere is busy, a lot more money around. What I can't get my head around is it is clear we have a housing shortage and I think the OECD are blaming housing, but how is that when we have a shortage of housing ? So how does overheating correlate to housing ?

There is a shortage of housing as way too few units have been built since 2008.

Ans still output is way below where it should be.

The housing shortage leads to escalating rents and house prices, which may lead to higher wage demands.

[Deleted User]

I'm really not sure where I see the overheating, but then again I'm not an ecomonist nor do I have the facts.

What exactly is driving this economy ?
You could really see the last time that it was domestic demand.
Houses where being built and that involved construction workers, materials, fuel, finincial services, legal services etc etc which employed a whole lot of people in a whole lot of areas.

And the same easy credit regime that was used to build the houses was also available to the people employed directly or indirectly, to buy cars, holiday, social life, etc etc.

But there is no sense of that booming domestic economy this time, so where is it coming from ?

One good point in the article was the mention of increased interest rates, many people still on trackers are keeping the head above water because of the low rates this decade, if they increase the squeezed middle will certainly get squeezed some more, including this poster.

Wanderer78

Oh there's no question, another crash is on the way, the only problem is, nobody knows the details of what, when, where and how it's gonna happen. The fundamentals that caused the crash in 2008 have not changed, so we await... Disturbingly, I suspect the changes that are required could take years if not decades to occur, so maybe we ll have to experience a few more serious crashes before we realise, something is seriously wrong

James Brown

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Oh there's no question, another crash is on the way, the only problem is, nobody knows the details of what, when, where and how it's gonna happen. The fundamentals that caused the crash in 2008 have not changed, so we await... Disturbingly, I suspect the changes that are required could take years if not decades to occur, so maybe we ll have to experience a few more serious crashes before we realise, something is seriously wrong

It's a choice. The state could change it's ways, but chooses to make hay and as much hay as possible before the clouds gather. That's my impression. Parties seem to have an idea of what they want, they go for it and the management of the broader day to day is given passing attention or more if it's so bothersome it may effect seats.

We seem to be overly concerned about the welfare of the building industry. This leads us to boom and bust. We know this since the FF government of the late 1980's.

NIMAN

Didn't David McWilliams say that he doesn't think there is another bust coming?

As for the conditions, well back in 08 we were all rich based on selling houses to each other, nothing else. Wealth and spending wasn't based on producing stuff, just selling property.

Not the same this time around. Many people in the country are still struggling and not spending foolishly.

Perhaps maybe Dublin is about to burst, but not the rest of the country? Can that happen?

James Brown

NIMAN wrote: »

Didn't David McWilliams say that he doesn't think there is another bust coming?

As for the conditions, well back in 08 we were all rich based on selling houses to each other, nothing else. Wealth and spending wasn't based on producing stuff, just selling property.

Not the same this time around. Many people in the country are still struggling and not spending foolishly.

Perhaps maybe Dublin is about to burst, but not the rest of the country? Can that happen?

I don't personally know anybody who over stretched themselves during the last boom, (unless we count families who bought homes), yet we all felt the harsh measures for having gone mad/partied, (which was an insult). The point is, I think people may be dragged into any upcoming recession regardless of personal choices. These things are too big to avoid, but if you're big enough, it seems you've less or no consequences, which may explain why the same people are back doing a lot of the same things and you and I should be the ones worried.

Chips Lovell

6541 wrote: »

What I can't get my head around is it is clear we have a housing shortage and I think the OECD are blaming housing, but how is that when we have a shortage of housing ? So how does overheating correlate to housing ?

The link to housing is that, shortage of housing is driving house price inflation (unlike the last time around, when access to credit the main driver). Prices of houses are going up faster than incomes, meaning there's more likelihood of people overstretching themselves in order to finance a house. If there was another economic shock, job losses and pay cuts could put borrowers under pressure to repay.

Now mortgage lending restrictions are much tighter than they used to be, but it's still a worry to see house price growth sprinting ahead of incomes

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Oh there's no question, another crash is on the way, the only problem is, nobody knows the details of what, when, where and how it's gonna happen.

If you don't know the details of what, when, where and how, how are you so sure there's another crash on the way?

NIMAN

But surely the only people exposing themselves to problems are those who are now stupidly paying way above the odds for Dublin houses?

That, in the context of the entire country, is only a small number of people. They can't be causing the whole economy to overheat surely?
Take out the housing crisis, is the country doing anything else majorly wrong in terms of the economy?

And if the arse falls out of the Irish housing market again, then those people will suffer, the likes of me won't?

James Brown

NIMAN wrote: »

But surely the only people exposing themselves to problems are those who are now stupidly paying way above the odds for Dublin houses?

That, in the context of the entire country, is only a small number of people. They can't be causing the whole economy to overheat surely?
Take out the housing crisis, is the country doing anything else majorly wrong in terms of the economy?

And if the arse falls out of the Irish housing market again, then those people will suffer, the likes of me won't?

It's a knock on effect. If enough people can't pay mortgages, the lenders tighten loan restrictions, companies hire less, freeze pay levels, rates increase to make up losses, taxes need meet more demand for people on low incomes needing more and more assistance and so on.
As regards housing the state enables the developers and (non-accidental) landlords set their own terms and if the public can't meet it, subsidies and aid comes in to play.
The housing market should be left to it's own devices in my view, more so, at any rate. If we, (tax payer/state) keep buying, they'll certainly not lower prices or if needs be push for circumstances were they can afford to lower prices.

Edward M

Matt Barrett wrote: »

It's a knock on effect. If enough people can't pay mortgages, the lenders tighten loan restrictions, companies hire less, freeze pay levels, rates increase to make up losses, taxes need meet more demand for people on low incomes needing more and more assistance and so on.
As regards housing the state enables the developers and (non-accidental) landlords set their own terms and if the public can't meet it, subsidies and aid comes in to play.
The housing market should be left to it's own devices in my view, more so, at any rate. If we, (tax payer/state) keep buying, they'll certainly not lower prices or if needs be push for circumstances were they can afford to lower prices.

Sounds a bit contradictory Matt?
It looks like you're criticising govt/state for allowing them set their own market, then state that they should be left to their own devices.
IMO the biggest threat to our economy is from outside of our control factors, given that we are so dependent on FDI.
Trump at the minute is a big threat, the situation in Italy and brexit, much more of a threat than housing!

Akrasia

The last crash was driven by 2 things, an unsustainable tax bubble because of construction related economic activity, and excessive debt that was underwritten by speculative demand. When people start buying property because they intend to flip it shortly afterwards to other speculators for a profit, that's a bubble.

Now we have stupid rents because there is a shortage of property so people are prepared to pay higher mortgages because it's cheaper than renting. The number of property transactions is low because credit is still unavailable to most people. People are buying for long term investment, not as a frenzy to realize short term profits

The last bubble was characterized by the banks throwing money at everyone and sub prime lending deliberately packaging bad loans and selling them to pension funds. This isn't happening in Europe now. Although American household debt is back at record levels.

[Deleted User]

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Oh there's no question, another crash is on the way, the only problem is, nobody knows the details of what, when, where and how it's gonna happen. The fundamentals that caused the crash in 2008 have not changed, so we await... Disturbingly, I suspect the changes that are required could take years if not decades to occur, so maybe we ll have to experience a few more serious crashes before we realise, something is seriously wrong

What fundamentals haven't changed? Please list them in bullet point style one by one rather than in a huge speel

Personally, I think 2008 bust was fueled as much externally as internally. Irish banks had access to huge sums .... they're lending nowhere near to those amounts currently.

Also many Irish folk had received SSIA returns in the years leading up to the crash. For the last decade we've been paying taxes with money that otherwise would have found its way into the economy.

Two major differences & I'm not really thinking about it.

Sierra Oscar

It was interesting chatting to some of the vendors at Bloom in the Park. General consensus is that people are starting to spend silly money on their gardens again, akin to the Celtic Tiger days.

I don't really like drawing comparisons with the Celtic Tiger though as no two bubbles are the same.

The Irish economy seems to be in a good place at the moment. However things are looking shaky internationally. We have the emergence of trade wars, a risky political climate in the US and parts of the EU, the unfolding of Brexit and an underlying sovereign debt crisis that still hasn't been resolved. Interest rates are also set to rise.

I would have concerns that these issues could conflate to bring about a global economic down turn which would inevitably have an impact on Ireland.

The average length of time between recessions in the US in the modern era is ten years. The previous one ended in 2009 so (crudely) speaking one is due. The question is whether it will just be a slight down turn or something that could trigger a global rout.

Edward M

Sierra Oscar wrote: »

It was interesting chatting to some of the vendors at Bloom in the Park. General consensus is that people are starting to spend silly money on their gardens again, akin to the Celtic Tiger days.

I don't really like drawing comparisons with the Celtic Tiger though as no two bubbles are the same.

The Irish economy seems to be in a good place at the moment. However things are looking shaky internationally. We have the emergence of trade wars, a risky political climate in the US and parts of the EU, the unfolding of Brexit and an underlying sovereign debt crisis that still hasn't been resolved. Interest rates are also set to rise.

I would have concerns that these issues could conflate to bring about a global economic down turn which would inevitably have an impact on Ireland.

The average length of time between recessions in the US in the modern era is ten years. The previous one ended in 2009 so (crudely) speaking one is due. The question is whether it will just be a slight down turn or something that could trigger a global rout.

Mainly agree. I would imagine now though that silly money is disposable income rather than borrowed money perhaps.
The main problem here is with attitudes about the economy doing well.
So many expect that to be passed down to everybody, basically thinking that if the economy is doing well everyone should be rich, that's never the case.
Its so easy for political party's to tell people that they will ensure that benefits from their policies will be to share the prosperity evenly, when genuinely that's never going to be the case.
What we need to realise is that a good economy means is that there is a chance for everyone to benefit, if they work at it themselves, not expect a govt to take from those driving the economy and hand it out to them in benefits.
You must be prepared to work at improving your own situation, then everyone can benefit from a good economy.

Villa05

Fr Tod Umptious wrote:

I'm really not sure where I see the overheating, but then again I'm not an ecomonist nor do I have the facts.

If the supply of something essential is curtailed/blocked it's price rises substantially. Given that accommodation costs accounts for nearly a third of income of an individual/family any rise in this puts significant pressure on wage and general inflation

Rising house/rental prices are the equivalent of an own goal in a soccer match. Not dealing with it adequately is like putting karius in goals

Villa05

Akrasia wrote:

The last crash was driven by 2 things, an unsustainable tax bubble because of construction related economic activity, and excessive debt that was underwritten by speculative demand. When people start buying property because they intend to flip it shortly afterwards to other speculators for a profit, that's a bubble.

We now have concerns of the sustainability of corporation tax.

Prices rising due to the lack of supply is a bubble

State finances are in a dire position while there was a buffer going into the last crisis

Bank are extremely vulnerable as much of the mess from the last crisis was swept under the carpet rather than being adequately

Low interest rates in a booming economy was a major contributory factor in the last collapse. This again is a problem for Ireland

Arthur Daley

Baron de Charlus wrote: »

Prices of houses are going up faster than incomes, meaning there's more likelihood of people overstretching themselves in order to finance a house.

I think at this stage, this condition has been observed so much since 1995 that it now warrants it's own space in economic textbooks as 'an Irish boom'.

We can talk about shortage of supply around Dublin, and the dogs on the street talk about that to death. But we also need to understand why we have such population growth, particularly in Greater Dublin, what these people are all doing they were not doing in 2008 or 2012, and how sustainable their current economic activity is.

Dohnjoe

Augeo wrote: »

Personally, I think 2008 bust was fueled as much externally as internally. Irish banks had access to huge sums .... they're lending nowhere near to those amounts currently.

Indeed. A lot has changed since the 2008 systemic crash. Globally there are much stricter lending and credit practices, much more (effective) regulation and things are generally much tighter.

The risks that banks, shadow banks and institutions took on a daily basis leading up to 2008 were staggering in comparison to today

Infini

I doubt the economy is at risk of overheating here, price's in the property market are high due to lack of supply, they're even been advertising in the building industry to try and get people back home from Australia and that because they need people to build new homes and offices such is the choke on supply.

If anything the risk's to the economy wont be from inside it would be external or something like a debt crisis in Italy dragging down things across the board. We got President Troll acting the bollocks as well and picking the wrong fight's to say the least but hopefully in another 2 years he'll be gone or sinking quickly during the 2020 election there.

Akrasia

Villa05 wrote: »

Prices rising due to the lack of supply is a bubble

No it isn't, that's the law of supply and demand. A speculative bubble is where people buy something today because they believe it is going to be more expensive tomorrow, but that belief is not tied to the intrinsic value of the asset. Things like tulips or .com tech stocks, or one bed apartments off the plans as investment properties.

If more houses are built, the price increases should subside. In a speculative bubble akin to 2005-2008, the more houses that got built. The faster the prices were rising.

[Deleted User]

Also....the "vulture funds" buying up blocks of apartments etc to let aren't borrowing the cash from Irish banks.

& I reckon most other priorities are being bought by effectively cash buyers or folk with quite credible income streams.

The exposure to an Irish property price crash is small compared to a decade ago.

FreudianSlippers

NIMAN wrote: »

But surely the only people exposing themselves to problems are those who are now stupidly paying way above the odds for Dublin houses?

Nothing personal, but this post personifies the real lack of understanding of general economics and housing that seems to be prevalent in Ireland - I blame the lack of a proper rental market and the abundance of social housing.

Paying above the odds has little to no relevance if the person can afford the house.

A house that costs €1m in Dublin at the moment has a possible LTV of 80%, monthly repayments of about $3k on a fixed 30-year mortgage. If one follows standard best practice a couple on a combined income of €200k can easily afford that house.

It makes little difference if there is a correction or even a significant drop in the value of that house unless they're basically flippers.

[Deleted User]

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

...........

A house that costs €1m in Dublin at the moment has a possible LTV of 80%, monthly repayments of about $3k on a fixed 30-year mortgage. If one follows standard best practice a couple on a combined income of €200k can easily afford that house..............

What institution are offering 2.1% 30 year fixed mortgages to folk living in Dublin?

Lantus

I'd say we will experience smaller peaks and troughs and in specific areas. More like localised crisis points.

Vulture funds are now ripe to dispose of their holdings at massive profit. Potential impact on property market prices and demand. Another group of people now stuck in zero or near negative equity possibly.

Agriculture affects from brexit.

Italy affects on banking.

Tariffs on EU goods. This will have minimal effect on Ireland unless currency varies. It could help offset brexit issues?

FreudianSlippers

It's 2.9% (I said about €3k) and it's KBC.

I just roughly used a mortgage calculator - the specifics don't negate my underlying point.

FreudianSlippers

Lantus wrote: »

Vulture funds are now ripe to dispose of their holdings at massive profit.

Why does that matter?

Potential impact on property market prices and demand.

How so?

[Deleted User]

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

It's 2.9% (I said about €3k) and it's KBC.

I just roughly used a mortgage calculator - the specifics don't negate my underlying point.

KBC offer a 30 year fixed rate?
Your underlying point is the alleged affordability of a 30 year €800k mortgage at a fixed rate.

their site mentions a 10 year fixed at 3.40%.

FreudianSlippers

Augeo wrote: »

KBC offer a 30 year fixed rate?
Your underlying point is the alleged affordability of a 30 year €800k mortgage at a fixed rate.

their site mentions a 10 year fixed at 3.40%.

Am I your personal banker or do you have some actual point here?

[Deleted User]

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Am I your personal banker or do you have some actual point here?

I think your claims that €800k can be borrowed over 30 years and repaid at €3k ish a month on a 30 year fixed rate are false.

Thus, your underlying point of affordability is a stretch too

3.4% would put repayments north of €3500/month.
I don't see a KBC product where you can fix for longer than 10 years.

FreudianSlippers

Augeo wrote: »

I think your claims that €800k can be borrowed over 30 years and repaid at €3k ish a month on a 30 year fixed rate are false.

Thus, your underlying point of affordability is a stretch too

3.4% would put repayments north of €3500/month.
I don't see a KBC product where you can fix for longer than 10 years.

Even a variable at around 3% is around €3,500/month. €200k joint income for a married couple is approx €10k/month.

Therefore within the 1/3 salary range of affordability.

Doesn't seem you have much to add other than to quibble about the specifics of mortgage rates?