WinnyThePoo wrote: » The left this....the left that......the left this....the left that....Seriously you need to get over the fact that people don't think in black and white.
Stephen15 wrote: » Good point. Tommy himself even admitted that he doesn't have a problem with immigrants only Muslims child rape gangs and Muslim terrorists and he believes moderate Muslims are victims of Islam. It's true when was the last you heard of a Hindu rape gang or a Buddist terrorists. But yet if you that call out Muslim rape gangs or Muslim terrorists it's "not all Muslims", "Islam is the religion of peace" and all that kind of crap from the left. But yet when there is a school shooting in America done by a white Christian you don't hear "it's not all Christians" or "Christianity is the religion of peace" from the left. They're all very quick to call out peadophile priest and misogyny in the Catholic church. But yet they don't even investigate the imams who could very be peadophiles too and don't even get me started on misogyny in Islam but that's all cultural enrichment according to the fake feminists and leftists.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » It’s funny that this post has been thanked by the same posters who when asked to provide proof that Tommy Robinson is a racist could not. Here’s the thing he’s not and there is fcuk all proof that he is.
FTA69 wrote: » If Tommy Robinson is so determined to have nonces locked up then it begs the question as to what he was doing potentially jeopardising a trial and thus allowing these bastards a potential recourse out. He knew full well what he was doing, he'd already been convicted of doing the same bloody thing before this but decided to crack on again in the hope of promoting himself. In other words, he put his own priorities ahead of that of actually locking up nonces. And of course never mind the victims. I think you'd be an idiot to dispute that grooming gangs exist and the fact they exist as a result of the problem amongst sections of a certain community and their attitudes toward women. I also think it would be silly to suggest the cops' 'hands were tied by political correctness' when the reality is that they just plain didn't give a sh*t about vulnerable Youth Reach-type girls from 'scumbag families' and the wrong part of town. Robinson is a far-right, racistideologue with an agenda and the above failures of the left and officialdom have allowed him to jump into that niche. But he doesn't actually care about paedophilia or Islamic extremism or any of these things; no more than the BNP or the National Front cared about social and economic issues - they're just a means to an end for him. He's bad f*cking news.
Snake Plisken wrote: » Lol the progressives on here don’t know what to make of Maajid it’s like his views are out of line with what they expect him to say as a Muslim and that confuses them. I just wish there were more free thinkers like him within the Muslim population
Its all alt right wrote: » Maajid Nawaz, an ex member of Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, gives his views on the whole incident. Makes a good point that people like Tommy are becoming popular due to years of silence from the greater population.
dav3 wrote: » You'd have to worry about the loons that support Tommy Robinson. Just how radicalised are they? We know he has radicalised terrorists before. Thankfully it's mostly thick brits and americans that fall for his sh*t.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/finsbury-park-terror-attack-tommy-robinson-far-right-britain-first-mark-rowley-speech-police-a8229936.html I'd hope counter terrorism in this country are keeping an eye on people who have an unhealthy obsession with defending him. At least with him locked up, the chance of him radicalising people decreases.
dav3 wrote: » I'd hope counter terrorism in this country are keeping an eye on people who have an unhealthy obsession with defending him
Venom wrote: » A society where you have the above convictions along with Robinson's current one becoming the norm is not healthy for anyone.
There is “no doubt” that far-right material posted online by the likes of Tommy Robinson and Britain First drove the Finsbury Park terror attacker to target Muslims, the UK’s most senior counter-terror officer has said.
Venom wrote: » Even taking everything you posted as 100% fact and I don't, the issue lots of people have is not so much about Robinson himself but the direction in which the UK police and legal system is heading.http://www.newsweek.com/youtuber-count-dankula-avoids-jail-following-hate-crime-conviction-teaching-896831 Youtuber convicted of a hate crime for a stupid video in which he trained a pug to do a Nazi salute.http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-43816921 A teenager convicted of hate crime for posting rap lyrics on Twitter in memory of a dead neighbour. A society where you have the above convictions along with Robinson's current one becoming the norm is not healthy for anyone.
FTA69 wrote: » If Tommy Robinson is so determined to have nonces locked up then it begs the question as to what he was doing potentially jeopardising a trial and thus allowing these bastards a potential recourse out. He knew full well what he was doing, he'd already been convicted of doing the same bloody thing before this but decided to crack on again in the hope of promoting himself. In other words, he put his own priorities ahead of that of actually locking up nonces. And of course never mind the victims. I think you'd be an idiot to dispute that grooming gangs exist and the fact they exist as a result of the problem amongst sections of a certain community and their attitudes toward women. I also think it would be silly to suggest the cops' 'hands were tied by political correctness' when the reality is that they just plain didn't give a sh*t about vulnerable Youth Reach-type girls from 'scumbag families' and the wrong part of town. Robinson is a far-right, racist ideologue with an agenda and the above failures of the left and officialdom have allowed him to jump into that niche. But he doesn't actually care about paedophilia or Islamic extremism or any of these things; no more than the BNP or the National Front cared about social and economic issues - they're just a means to an end for him. He's bad f*cking news.
markodaly wrote: » What does Owen Jones have to say for the hundreds of young girls who were sexually abused while the state did nothing?
wes wrote: » Guardian journalist Owen Jones has received threats from the Yaxley-Lennon fan club:
johnp001 wrote: » Is this the talk you are referring to?
murphthesmurf wrote: » ... There is an interesting video on Youtube of a talk given by the reporter who first broke the story of what was happening (sorry I've tried to find it to link to it but can't ), heart breaking to listen to. They only started arresting people after hebroke the story. One incident he talks of was a 13yr old girl in a flat above a takeaway. The police were called by the girls parents. When they arrived they found her upstairs with 7 men, she was intoxicated. The polioce arrested her, not the men, no questions were asked of them. She was arrested for drunken disorderly. ...
Grayson wrote: » I agree. If the abusers had all pled guilty rather than go to trial, this would have been over far quicker. It might have also helped if they'd committed the offense outside a court house.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » he has done a bit more than just commit mortgage fraud. It is his other activities that make him a scumbag.
wes wrote: » Guardian journalist Owen Jones has received threats from the Yaxley-Lennon fan club: Such wonderful people the Yaxley-Lennon fan club threatening violence, due to the law being rightly being enforced.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » How about if they committed the offense at a court house, were convicted, sentenced and specifically warned by the judge that if they did it again they would be locked up, and then proceeded to commit the offense at another courthouse within a year?