goose2005 wrote: » probably because they were poor. The best defence against burglars is rich neighbours
diggerdigger wrote: » It was the big house. Full of lots of antiques.
Colonel Claptrap wrote: » Excellent use of the term cross pollination!
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
Permabear wrote: This post had been deleted.
Grayson wrote: » He said traveller, not northsider.
Necrominus wrote: » :pac: that probably comes from all the alleged cousin marrying
Mutant z wrote: » Well if travellers can become settled i see no reason why the opposote can't occur.
judeboy101 wrote: » Some kids in my school are registered as travellers, they ain't travellers but we know they are doing it to access HEAR for leaving cert points . For those in the know they are using the 1,2,4 route as 5,6 doesn't apply to our school.
Dr Brown wrote: » I would like to become a "traveller" so that I can become tax exempt and not be subject to the normal rules of society. If I turned up to social welfare and said that I now consider myself to be a "traveller" would they set me up as one ?
_Whimsical_ wrote: » This would mean they'd receive college offers for reduced points than the rest of the leaving cert population and would be entitled to extra supports in college from one to one tuition where needed to increased access to bursaries and grants.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Do you fancy your cousin OP?
wexie wrote: » is this modern day 'equality' at work?
Dr Brown wrote: I would like to become a "traveller" so that I can become tax exempt and not be subject to the normal rules of society.
Sleeper12 wrote: » Marry one & you can become a traveller.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » Ditto just 'cos a Traveller moves into a house doesn't make them not a Traveller any more.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » It's basically 'Affirmitive Action. You see it in the States with SAT scores. It ends up impacting on those from more privileged backgrounds as they're held to higher standards.