Sam Quentin wrote: » Ok admittedly it may seem I held my rd, and it's certainly obvious he held his rd.. I only held my rd because I had read the rd as I approached you, I certainly did NOT expect you to continue holding your rd as I passed(not far from your pedal)yet you had ample space to tip in even 12" to the exit of estate as I passed, but yet you let me pass you at considerable speed bearing in mind I had an oncoming car leaving me with sfa clearance and I still had to contend with you 'holding your rd' and not taking advantage of the HUGE clearance to your left!?PS:Please ignore rear view date and time
fancy pigeon wrote: » ...
tossy wrote: » I'd be the last to defend cyclists but you are 100% in the wrong there and i imagine you put the heart sideways in the guy on the bike. It's not his responsibility to check behind him everytime he sees an oncoming car, it's not his responsibility to move into the entrance to the estate (or any entrance) to give other traffic more room, in fact that would be dangerous as there is no garuantee every cyclist would move in or that they could get back out again. It's your responsibility to slow and yeild to the oncoming traffic.
Sam Quentin wrote: » Ok admittedly it may seem I held my rd, and it's certainly obvious he held his rd.. I only held my rd because I had read the rd as I approached you, I certainly did NOT expect you to continue holding your rd as I passed(not far from your pedal)yet you had ample space to tip in even 12" to the exit of estate as I passed, but yet you let me pass you at considerable speed bearing in mind I had an oncoming car leaving me with sfa clearance and I still had to contend with you 'holding your rd' and not taking advantage of the HUGE clearance to your left!?
Mr Magnolia wrote: » Yikes! I wouldn't wish that on him no matter how dumb the manoeuvre, was s/he ok?
tcawley29 wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7t0mSS9is8 Good enough for the biker in my opinion. Clown
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
spurious wrote: » Those daft 'Harley style' handlebars. Useless imo for controlling a bike.
endacl wrote: » Harleys have loads of different styles. Those are ‘ape hangers’.
Patww79 wrote: » I'd call that one a case of tough titties. Stay out of the bus lane.
Cantona's Collars wrote: » https://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7441093/d151f732/dashcamcrashcompilatie_v_d_maand.html A load of stuff to pass a few minutes. You'd wonder in some of the clips if people had just discovered driving and thought "feck it, I'll give it a go,sure what can go wrong".
GreeBo wrote: » The most remarkable thing about that biker/bus video is that the woman who got out her phone was using it to phone someone useful rather than start taking useless videos for later!
Sam Quentin wrote: » Ok admittedly it may seem I held my rd, and it's certainly obvious he held his rd.. I only held my rd because I had read the rd as I approached you, I certainly did NOT expect you to continue holding your rd as I passed(not far from your pedal)yet you had ample space to tip in even 12" to the exit of estate as I passed, but yet you let me pass you at considerable speed bearing in mind I had an oncoming car leaving me with sfa clearance and I still had to contend with you 'holding your rd' and not taking advantage of the HUGE clearance to your left!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1dltWwh5l4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbjZn2OQ6Sk PS:Please ignore rear view date and time
fancy pigeon wrote: » I know wheres a good spot to go for a wander... The motorway. I was overtaking the Kumquat and another vehicle before the clip starts before the fasht lane brigade jizz themselves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRmEMMkLQrw In case youtube bolloxes up the quality again, here is a still of the gentleman walking on the M1. He's after the road sign, also in blueAttachment not found.
n1ck wrote: » Now this definitely isn't my fault!
jaxxx wrote: » Tsk tsk, but is definitely is. 1/3 of a second late on your breaking, for shame!
