nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Tommy Robinson jailed

[Deleted User]

Apparently according to Lauren Southern, Tommy has been sentenced to 13 months but there is a UK wide embargo on reporting.

Anyone else got any info?

Edit. Not too sure about the authenticity of the embargo. I'm assuming that it's for this https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html?amp

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

A Pint of Goo

Grayson wrote: »

So you hate muslims, feminists and you think police are fascists. If you could say something about jews or a media conspiracy I'd win the right wing bingo.

BTW, you never did say if you thought it was the polices fault for not putting a second entrance in place to protect the victims from Tommy Robinson.

Well he has a point. Where are the feminists? Why don't they care?

20Cent

Captain Obvious wrote: »

That explains the breach of the peace arrest.

Thats thw video that got him a suspended sentencea year ago. He was told not to do ot again as a condition of the suspension. He did it again so is now in jail. He's not the smartest of people.

Grayson

JohnMc1 wrote: »

That would take some actual courage on their part to stand up against Islam. Better to stick to easier targets like White Men and Air Conditioning.

So you hate muslims, feminists and you think police are fascists. If you could say something about jews or a media conspiracy I'd win the right wing bingo.

BTW, you never did say if you thought it was the polices fault for not putting a second entrance in place to protect the victims from Tommy Robinson.

thebull85

20Cent wrote: »

These guys should be locked up for a long time. A mistrial seems to be their best bet Robinson is helping with that.

Here's his video https://youtu.be/dE4Q8c_Pm5c

Seen this video last year, what is the problem here?

Captain Obvious

20Cent wrote: »

These guys should be locked up for a long time. A mistrial seems to be their best bet Robinson is helping with that.

Here's his video https://youtu.be/dE4Q8c_Pm5c

That explains the breach of the peace arrest.

Its all alt right

Ramin Djawadi wrote: »

Why is tommy different from the hundreds who turned up daily to shout abuse at Rolf Harris when he was in court?

Well that's the question really. I just can't imagine there is a system in place that could make mistrials so easy to bring about. Maybe I'm missing somthing here..

Grayson

Ramin Djawadi wrote: »

Why is tommy different from the hundreds who turned up daily to shout abuse at Rolf Harris when he was in court?

Were they there because they hated australians?

Captain Obvious

JohnMc1 wrote: »

You couldn't stump a wooden log. You're post was and worthless. Where did I say I that? Prove it or shut the **** up.

Right here

JohnMc1 wrote: »

If protections weren't put in place to protect the children [special entrance,etc] then that's the British Police and Court's fault. Not Tommy Robinson.

20Cent

thebull85 wrote: »

No one was called muslim paedo outside the court, you're talking through your hole. They were asked what they were in court for. The reaction from them speaks for itself, guilty men that dont give a f**k about the law. Child rapists, and according to their supporters and family its the childrens fault because they are slags..

These guys should be locked up for a long time. A mistrial seems to be their best bet Robinson is helping with that.

Here's his video https://youtu.be/dE4Q8c_Pm5c

JohnMc1

Captain Obvious wrote: »

I figured that's stump you alright. So not only are you defending a man who had jeopardised a child abuse trial, you also believe the police should be responsible for keeping the victims of that abuse away from that same man for their own good. Do you have any concept of personal responsibility?

You couldn't stump a wooden log. You're post was and worthless. Where did I say I that? Prove it or shut the **** up.

Its all alt right

Still not sure what it was Tommy did at the court yet. I don't understand, if it is so easy for a mistrial to be called by someone turning up and saying stuff...why don't the accused just pay one of their lackeys to turn up and do whatever whatever it was Tommy did?

Captain Obvious

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Oh look. It s Capt. Oblivious again. Here to post another worthless post.

I figured that's stump you alright. So not only are you defending a man who had jeopardised a child abuse trial, you also believe the police should be responsible for keeping the victims of that abuse away from that same man for their own good. Do you have any concept of personal responsibility?

JohnMc1

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

Where the hell are the feminists? Or are white girls not important to them?

That would take some actual courage on their part to stand up against Islam. Better to stick to easier targets like White Men and Air Conditioning.

A Pint of Goo

Ramin Djawadi wrote: »

or as the media would say "culturally enriched"
never forget FG and Leo want to bring Muslim immigrants to Ireland in LARGE numbers

Where the hell are the feminists? Or are white girls not important to them?

JohnMc1

Captain Obvious wrote: »

So you think the children should have been protected from Robinson now?

Oh look. It s Capt. Oblivious again. Here to post another worthless post.

JohnMc1

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

So your supporting a mistrial then. Good stuff. Fight the power.

Again. Where did I say that? Prove i said that or shut the **** up.

Captain Obvious

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Oh Please. If protections weren't put in place to protect the children [special entrance,etc] then that's the British Police and Court's fault. Not Tommy Robinson.

So you think the children should have been protected from Robinson now?

A Pint of Goo

Ramin Djawadi wrote: »

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., is accused of 54 charges, including 21 charges of rape and 14 charges of trafficking with a view of sexual exploitation. Dhaliwal is accused of charges against eleven different girls from 2004 to 2011...

Jesus Christ there must be thousands of English girls raped by these bastards.

WinnyThePoo

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Where did I say that? I said that if that's all it takes to cause a mistrail than the British Justice System is in a sad state of affairs.

So your supporting a mistrial then. Good stuff. Fight the power.

Vlad Kelly

He broke the biggest taboo in the west at the moment, he spoke the truth about sh1tlam.

JohnMc1

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

So you want a mistrail. Fascinating.

Where did I say that? I said that if that's all it takes to cause a mistrail than the British Justice System is in a sad state of affairs.

WinnyThePoo

JohnMc1 wrote: »

If that is all it takes to cause a mistrial then the British Justice System is in a sad state of affairs.

So you want a mistrail. Fascinating.

JohnMc1

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Why do you want a mistrail?

If that is all it takes to cause a mistrial then the British Justice System is in a sad state of affairs.

WinnyThePoo

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Just like you're doing to justify the fascist police state of Britain?

Why do you want a mistrail?

JohnMc1

pitifulgod wrote: »

You'll do everything to justify his behaviour...

Just like you're doing to justify the fascist police state of Britain?

pitifulgod

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Oh Please. If protections weren't put in place to protect the children [special entrance,etc] then that's the British Police and Court's fault. Not Tommy Robinson.

You'll do everything to justify his behaviour...

Grayson

JohnMc1 wrote: »

Oh Please. If protections weren't put in place to protect the children [special entrance,etc] then that's the British Police and Court's fault. Not Tommy Robinson.

So when someone breaks the law it's the fault of the person who made the law, not the person who broke it?

Or are you saying that it's the polices fault because they should have made a greater effort to protect victims from people like tommy robinson?

thebull85

20Cent wrote: »

The worst thing that could happen is the case against the grooming gang collapsing. Apparently they are going to call for a mistrial now after a juror was filmed being called a Muslim pedo outside the courthouse.

No one was called muslim paedo outside the court, you're talking through your hole. They were asked what they were in court for. The reaction from them speaks for itself, guilty men that dont give a f**k about the law. Child rapists, and according to their supporters and family its the childrens fault because they are slags..

JohnMc1

pitifulgod wrote: »

You're an apologist for him endangering the legal process and actually endangering a conviction.

Oh Please. If protections weren't put in place to protect the children [special entrance,etc] then that's the British Police and Court's fault. Not Tommy Robinson.

professore

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

I know this is going to sound pedantic, and I know there's a rule against grammar Nazism, but can we PLEASE got one thing straight?

There are no such words as "Muslimism" or "Islamsism": Islam is the religion; a Muslim is the person who practices the religion.

Sorry to go back to basics, but if you want to try and give the impression that you know what you're talking about when it comes to religious ethnic groups and their influence on societal community relations, getting the basic words right is kind of a pre-requisite.

Getting them so fanatically wrong makes you look like a complete and utter ****wit no matter what point you make.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamism