solerina wrote: » it was a very warm day too which I expect didn't help. I saw Pat from Deise Animal sanctuary visited the horse that evening, he was alive and fine according to her. It made me wonder why they were allowed to keep him ?? Disgraceful, I get angry everytime I see a sulky on the road.
Alina High Teacup wrote: » Thanks. I see it now on google maps. I did not realise it was still Heywood Road up further after crossing the bypass. That is an awful hill for a poor little horse, no wonder he collapsed. Going up and down there regularly I expect
Between the bypass and Boston Scientific/Abbott, just coming up to the halting site.
Alina High Teacup wrote: » Where exactly did the incident with the horse happen? Is it the Heywood road that you turn up from queen street into? Have those thugs been in court yet?
dieselbug wrote: » No they didn't, but they would know me anyway so may have noted it for some sort of correction later but nothing made of it to me on the day.
It wasnt me123 wrote: » It is a mess, there were a few with two cards at the booth I voted at. Did they take your details and fill in a form? Its for anomalies to the register.
dieselbug wrote: » I'm aware of the consequences of attempting to vote twice and would never be tempted to do so. I handed in the second card at the polling station and was left with the impression that I was not the only one. I heard Mattie complaining during the last week that the register is a mess and it looks like he may have a point.
Jim Bowen wrote: » Voting more than once is a criminal offence, best to stick to the once. You would probably have been caught even if the opportunity to offend was not of your making, knowingly voting twice would see you get a significant fine at best.
dieselbug wrote: » Not so sure, named two times with two different numbers.
Freya Magnificent Raceway wrote: » Your name would be crossed off after voting first time :-)
dieselbug wrote: I got two polling cards and was listed two times so could probably have voted two times.
cml387 wrote: » I went to vote this morning in Peter and Paul's primary school as usual. There are no booth numbers on the polling card. I knew where to go because I've been there so often. Newer voters will not. A bit of a cock up methinks.
F34 wrote: » There is only so much the Gardai can do. It's the lack of proper sentencing from the Judiciary that's the real problem. The council also hold a massive amount of the blame by not enforcing the terms and conditions they have to adhere to having had dealing with the Council "it's my Culture" wouldn't wash for anyone else. The site on the bypass has sewage running onto the public footpath which nothing is being done about it as well as the rubbish they dump around he area.
F34 wrote: » Removing that halting site would resolve a hell of a lot of the problems in town. There’s not one of them not known to the Gardai and indeed the armed response unit.
holystungun9 wrote: » I walked it back in February when it was raining a lot. From memory, I think it was about 9km and maybe 1hr 40 each way. It's a nice walk but I found the walk back a bit of a drag. Next time, a friend is going to park in Kilsheelan and then we can drive back to Clonmel. At that time at least, in Kilsheelan the hard path ended at the start of the village and walking on grass for the last 200/300 meters was necessary. The recent dry weather will help as I had a hard time getting around puddles and mud to get right down to the bridge.
JACK BE NIMBLE wrote: » Hi, Could anyone tell me if it's possible to walk from Clonmel to Kilsheelan via the Suir? I've read various comments about people doing this but no specifics, Would anyone know the starting point in Clonmel to get down onto the path, and ultimately whereabouts in Kilsheelan you'd end up? Thanks
