tigger123 wrote: » Between the SSM referendum and yesterday's the result the last few years have been incredibly important for Ireland. Delighted to see young people so engaged in the political system and making their own decisions about their own futures.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I voted no. Not because I don't care about women - but because the proposed legislation is too extreme. I spent yesterday comforting my daughter and her partner because she had a miscarriage. It was an unplanned pregnancy - and they are both devastated. Many "Yes" voters regard embryos as a "clump of cells". I challenge you to say that to my daughters face. She is grieving for a baby. The gestational age was 5 weeks. There was no reason another referendum couldn't have been held to cater for the hard cases. There is no legislation being proposed to protect women against forced abortion. There are no plans to increase support for women in crises pregnancies who do not want an abortion. The proposed legislation will not effectively help the majority of women. It will merely present abortion as a solution for all the problems - which it is not, and never can be. I voted no. Not because I don't care about women, but because I care enough to want better for them and their unborn babies. There is nothing shameful about that, and it speaks volumes that you would make such a triumphalist statement, TBH.
Muzzymor wrote: » Might be able to help but first I have a question. Do you want one for virtue signalling purposes?
C__MC wrote: » I see the three ulster counties are taking a small bashing on this. Especially donegal. Harsh on Monaghan Cavan as they did pass it/ close enough though
Haylee Purple Showboat wrote: » Those young people so engaged in the political system as you say won't be in a polling station for the next election. I saw the drop off first hand with the SSM/ election votes. Had a hippy in my polling station Friday in his 30's saying it was his first time Had another girl in her business suit , again in her 30's saying the same. They were caught up with a cause. It's a far cry from being engaged.
Cody montana wrote: » Anything from John Waters yet or the rest of the no side?
pitifulgod wrote: » You're making a lot of generalisations about younger voters. I've voted on every issue and election since I gained right to vote 8 years ago. I was incredibly passionate about marriage referendum. But this is the first time I've ever canvassed. I'll most likely never canvass for a politician but I'm very much so engaged in the process and many other younger people are. I also think young people should be praised for their passion for social issues. Even when it might not even impact them.
Fred Swanson wrote: » This post has been deleted.
DubInMeath wrote: » Still awaiting his announcement as to where he's emigrating to. Still waiting on John McGuirk to announce he's going to stick to his pledge not to get involved in political campaigns. Declan Ganley has already been on saying it was a conspericy and he's not having his taxes used for the health service, so waiting on him to become a tax exile" Save the 8th released a statement saying they will continue to prevent abortions anyway where ever it will be carried out in Ireland so read what you want from that.
Fighting Tao wrote: » Those damn millennials exercising both their right to vote and not to vote.
Cody montana wrote: » I’d nearly set up a Gofundme page to send him to North Korea or Neptune if we get enough donations.
_Dara_ wrote: » Read a pro-lifer on Twitter saying that it’s not a landslide because 38% of people didn’t vote. How do people not get that anyone who doesn’t vote is forfeiting their right to be counted? And how does that tweeter know that all the non-voters would vote no?
Haylee Purple Showboat wrote: » Those same millennials will then complain about government policy effecting them when they never engaged with putting people into office who matched their ideals in the first place. In the real world I don't engage in discussion with those moaning about the government who never voted
Water John wrote: » We'll raise the voting age to 35 or even 40. Those young people are too easily swayed and not to be trusted.
DubInMeath wrote: » Well considering you didn't want people who you judged to not be Christians posting in another thread you seem to have a problem entering into discussion altogether.
Fred Swanson wrote: » They don't accept the war has been lost.