pitifulgod wrote: » You're an apologist for him endangering the legal process and actually endangering a conviction.
JohnMc1 wrote: » They'd probably get off anyway.
Captain Obvious wrote: » The same people on here defending Robinson would be having a field day if a Muslim grooming gang got off a conviction because of a mistrial.
deco nate wrote: » Sorry thought you were just posting about his arrest. Tbh, that's piss poor reporting by the metro. " pouring Stella Artois over 10 Downing Street" Poor journalism at best, or is that worst. It wasn't anything like that from the videos I've seen. In fact they were mostly respectful
Mutant z wrote: » Which is worse what Tommy Robinson says or muslim gangs grooming little girls.
dd972 wrote: » He's just a wee attention seeker like that nutjob Asian Glaswegian who's a fanatical Rangers fan and attends Britain First marches.
Grayson wrote: » 6 posts up. One of the links I posted has it.
deco nate wrote: » Not what I have been reading, also nothing about the protests outside 10 downing Street today in the media.
Grayson wrote: » So people can report that he was arrested and that he's currently in jail but can't report that he has had his suspended sentence activated? is that what you're saying? I googled and when there's a suspended sentence the accused has to go before a judge to get it reactivated.https://www.defence-barrister.co.uk/suspended-sentences/ I'd say that he's just being held until he's put in front of a judge. He's all over twitter. Some non UK source could have reported on it by now but there's not a single article saying he's been actually sentanced.
deco nate wrote: » He has been locked up for 13 months, I'd like to know what the original sentence was 13 months? The judge ordered a ban on reporting on the case that's why it's not been reported in the media, apparently
Committing a further offence If a defendant is convicted of an offence committed during the operational period of a suspended sentence, this will also mean the case will come back to court for the defendant to be dealt with for breach. Admitting the breach Where a defendant is returned to court for breach of a requirement of a suspended sentence, he will be asked if he admits the breach. If not, a hearing will have to take place for the judge to decide whether he is in breach or not. Sentence activation In the event of a breach, unless it considers it unjust to do so, the court will activate the suspended sentence (in whole or in part), meaning that the defendant will have to serve some or all of the sentence of imprisonment or detention in a Young Offender Institution.
Taytoland wrote: » Should not have filmed them if he was told not to do so especially on a suspended sentence. So his own fault in that regard. We do not need to see videos on these Pakistani Muslim gangs who rape children all over the country, we all know they exist. I don't blame him for his views on Islamism, I hold similar views to him on it.
Grayson wrote: » But I haven't seen that anywhere. It just says he was arrested. It also says he had a suspended sentence but a judge generally has to reactivate that right? This is the latest news story I can findhttps://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/tommy-robinson-hmp-hull-prison-1612623 And here's anotherhttps://metro.co.uk/2018/05/26/tommy-robinson-supporters-climb-gates-downing-street-arrest-7580655/ It says nothing about sentencing. I'd imagine he's being held until he can be arraigned
Captain Obvious wrote: » Isn't the only source for that him shouting it as he was being arrested?
deco nate wrote: » From what I have seen, and 20 cent replied. He has been sentenced to 13 months. if that is true something is really wrong
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » Bullsh*t, he was arrested for a breach of the peace not for reporting outside the courthouse.
20Cent wrote: » He got a suspended sentanced a year ago on condition he wouldn't interfere with the cases. He did exactly that so suspension lifted and off to prison. No one to blame but himself.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » You're not familiar with this country's history then? I'm not saying that either one is in any way acceptable, I'm just trying to promote consistency if people want to make the perpetrator's religion an issue.
deco nate wrote: » Is it normal for someone to get sentenced that quick?
Grayson wrote: » I haven't seen anywhere say that he was sentenced. Just arrested. I think he probably hasn't been sent back to court yet. However his supporters are going nuts on twitter and don't seem to care what's written elsewhere since they have the one real truth.
20Cent wrote: » No 13.
deco nate wrote: » Is it true that Tommy got 18 months?