nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Tommy Robinson jailed

[Deleted User]

Apparently according to Lauren Southern, Tommy has been sentenced to 13 months but there is a UK wide embargo on reporting.

Anyone else got any info?

Edit. Not too sure about the authenticity of the embargo. I'm assuming that it's for this https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html?amp

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Poor Uncle Tom

They're singing the fields of Athenry in Kiev......

Lessons should be learned here...

ohnonotgmail

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

Of course I'm familiar with our history. I'm sure therefore you agree that covering up sexual violence, so as not to offend the Catholic Church or the Multicult is stupid and wrong.

so i'm sure you would agree that taking actions that might result in the trial for sexual violence being declared a mistrial is also stupid and wrong.

A Pint of Goo

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

You're not familiar with this country's history then?

I'm not saying that either one is in any way acceptable, I'm just trying to promote consistency if people want to make the perpetrator's religion an issue.

Of course I'm familiar with our history. I'm sure therefore you agree that covering up sexual violence, so as not to offend the Catholic Church or the Multicult is stupid and wrong.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

We're they Christian there'd be no cover up...

You're not familiar with this country's history then?

I'm not saying that either one is in any way acceptable, I'm just trying to promote consistency if people want to make the perpetrator's religion an issue.

Tipsy McSwagger

Free Tommy Robinson petition already has over 84,000 signatures

https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-free-tommy-robinson

A Pint of Goo

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Spellcheck on aisle 3....

Seriously though - that was my point: if the perpetrators are Christian, it somehow becomes in some way less distasteful or less worthy of protest...?

We're they Christian there'd be no cover up...

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

enricoh wrote: »

Perpitrators I said , but you knew that.
(At least I hope you Know what perpitrators means after the English lesson off you a few posts earlier)

Spellcheck on aisle 3....

Seriously though - that was my point: if the perpetrators are Christian, it somehow becomes in some way less distasteful or less worthy of protest...?

20Cent

Captain Obvious wrote: »

The state who is trying to prosecute them while Mr Robinson tries to sabotage their trial?

Robinson in danger of collapsing the case for a few clicks and social media fame.
Utter moron and does not give a sh1te about the victims.

DickSwiveller

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Just to clarify for Dick here and people who are completely unaware of what they are talking about, Tommy Robinson was videoing people going into a trial of a grooming gang (apparently being tried for a crime is "operating freely"). His actions could have damaged the trial and allowed the accused people to go free. Dick, can you explain why you would be in favour of those men getting a mistrial?

Are you unaware of the recent reports from places like Telford, Oxford, Newcastle, Rotherham that have made the exact point I was making?

Raging_Ninja

Captain Obvious wrote: »

None of which excuses his attempts to damage this trial. Why do you think those men should have been denied a fair trial and released?

The latest video does not appear to show him recording anyone other than himself. Would a reasonable person construe that as breach of the peace?

Captain Obvious

Raging_Ninja wrote: »

Are you for real? It is a fact that local authorities, police services and even child protection authorities were ignoring and covering up these crimes for the last 30 years at least. When he first started his protests, he was called a racist, made fun of (including by me) and dismissed out of hand, and yet he was proven right all along.

Even if it turns out that he is a bigot, you have to acknowledge the fact that he was doing his absolute best to publicize these crimes and their coverups and bring them to public knowledge.

None of which excuses his attempts to damage this trial. Why do you think those men should have been denied a fair trial and released?

Captain Obvious

DickSwiveller wrote: »

Jailed for reporting on muslim grooming gangs who have been operating freely because the authorities were afraid of being called racist. But sure, **** thousands of vulnerable children. As long as the virtue signalers can denounce an idiot like Robinson everything is ok.

The idiot cycle continues.....

Just to clarify for Dick here and people who are completely unaware of what they are talking about, Tommy Robinson was videoing people going into a trial of a grooming gang (apparently being tried for a crime is "operating freely"). His actions could have damaged the trial and allowed the accused people to go free. Dick, can you explain why you would be in favour of those men getting a mistrial?

Raging_Ninja

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Yes I can safely say Mr Robinson has nothing to do with the investigation and prosecution of the case he is trying to scupper.

Are you for real? It is a fact that local authorities, police services and even child protection authorities were ignoring and covering up these crimes for the last 30 years at least. When he first started his protests, he was called a racist, made fun of (including by me) and dismissed out of hand, and yet he was proven right all along.

Even if it turns out that he is a bigot, you have to acknowledge the fact that he was doing his absolute best to publicize these crimes and their coverups and bring them to public knowledge.

A Pint of Goo

Hapax Legomenon wrote: »

Repeat after me: Nothing. Is. Ever. Racist.

Agreed. Pakistanis preying on white girls because they are seen as 'sluts for being white is in no way a racist crime. Not in any way what so ever.

DickSwiveller

Jailed for reporting on muslim grooming gangs who have been operating freely because the authorities were afraid of being called racist. But sure, **** thousands of vulnerable children. As long as the virtue signalers can denounce an idiot like Robinson everything is ok.

The idiot cycle continues.....

enricoh

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

There's a quota of abuse victims that has to be met now before it's distasteful enough to warrant protesting...?

Perpitrators I said , but you knew that.
(At least I hope you Know what perpitrators means after the English lesson off you a few posts earlier)

Tipsy McSwagger

Odhinn wrote: »

So it is about race?

Why did you highlight ‘Pakistanis’?

Raging_Ninja

Odhinn wrote: »

So it is about race?

Less about race and more about the culture. There is rot inside some cultures that is becoming more publicly visible.

Take a look at this for a great debate on the matter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_vRCOtr1Mw

Yer Da sells Avon

Odhinn wrote: »

So it is about race?

Repeat after me: Nothing. Is. Ever. Racist.

Captain Obvious

Raging_Ninja wrote: »

Without Tommy Robinson's constant protesting, would the same state that was ignoring the victims, covering up the crimes and protecting the paedophile rings be prosecuting them now?

Yes I can safely say Mr Robinson has nothing to do with the investigation and prosecution of the case he is trying to scupper.

Raging_Ninja

Captain Obvious wrote: »

The state who is trying to prosecute them while Mr Robinson tries to sabotage their trial?

Without Tommy Robinson's constant protesting, would the same state that was ignoring the victims, covering up the crimes and protecting the paedophile rings be prosecuting them now?

Odhinn

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

Of course not. It's just the state looking the other way while Pakistanis raped and abused white Englands girls for years.

So it is about race?

Captain Obvious

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

Of course not. It's just the state looking the other way while Pakistanis raped and abused white Englands girls for years.

The state who is trying to prosecute them while Mr Robinson tries to sabotage their trial?

A Pint of Goo

Odhinn wrote: »

I thought this wasn't about race?

Of course not. It's just the state looking the other way while Pakistanis raped and abused white Englands girls for years.

Raging_Ninja

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

There's a quota of abuse victims that has to be met now before it's distasteful enough to warrant protesting...?

Not victims, perpetrators. These are large paedophile rings by and large composed of people of Bangladeshi and Pakistani descent who are committing gang rapes of children and teenagers. And these rings have, over the last 30 years, been protected by the elected local authorities and police services.

If that isn't worth protesting, I don't know what is.

Odhinn

A Pint of Goo wrote: »

White girls have to sacrified on the altar of multiculturalism. How else can we have peaceful and tolerant societies like the UK and Sweden?

I thought this wasn't about race?

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

enricoh wrote: »

If you can find any child abuse trials on here or the uk where there are 29 perpitrators on trial that aren't Muslim please let us know. Sod it, forget 29 try 9.

There's a quota of abuse victims that has to be met now before it's distasteful enough to warrant protesting...?

enricoh

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Can i do this for all child abuse cases or do they have to be Muslim ones?

If you can find any child abuse trials on here or the uk where there are 29 perpitrators on trial that aren't Muslim please let us know. Sod it, forget 29 try 9.

A Pint of Goo

Tipsy McSwagger wrote: »

The ironic thing is there were people who wanted to report these scum Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs who targeted white underage girls, but were afraid to because of being labeled a racist. Tommy Robinson is reporting on it but gets labeled a racist, even though there's zero interest evidence to back this up.

White girls have to sacrified on the altar of multiculturalism. How else can we have peaceful and tolerant societies like the UK and Sweden?

Captain Obvious

Tipsy McSwagger wrote: »

The ironic thing is there were people who wanted to report these scum Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs who targeted white underage girls, but were afraid to because of being labeled a racist. Tommy Robinson is reporting on it but gets labeled a racist, even though there's zero interest evidence to back this up.

That doesn't sound like irony.