YFlyer wrote: » Mushy wrote: » Pity the southern towns are in a different constituency, may have swayed it a bit How could it?
Mushy wrote: » Pity the southern towns are in a different constituency, may have swayed it a bit
Sheeps wrote: » Pregnant women will be the most powerful members of society after this legislation goes through, having veto powers over human life.
moloner4 wrote: » Anyone get the name off newstalk from the fella who said the media propaganda made the no side lose? It was so cringy he got cut off.
jill_valentine wrote: » That's a mighty humblebrag sneaking in there
Fighting Tao wrote: » :rolleyes: Someone with a gun will be more powerful then them.
Amalgam wrote: » Cruel and callous is a sceptic tank full of anonymous corpses. Devoid of dignity and identity. Their Mothers driven to the very end of their emotional and physical wits.
Sheeps wrote: » The poster I was responding to wasn't talking about rape. They we're making the case that if a father doesn't want a child aborted he should be getting someone pregnant.
Dookie Monster wrote: » Ask your priest. That's the Church's position.
Sheeps wrote: » Not in the eyes of the law.
wakka12 wrote: » There is quite an urban rural divide though? The highest percentage of no votes have been Offaly, limerick, tipperary, galway and Laois, ranging from between 41.9-38.6% NO. And the lowest no votes have been Dublin Central ,Wicklow, Kildare North and South, and Dublin North west, all ranging from 23.5-26.9% NO vote
Omackeral wrote: » That's ridiculous. You could tell people in the lead up that you're going with YES if you wanted to appear popular/fitting in/progressive and even tell them afterwards that you did so but once you're in the booth it's totally anonymous and you can vote however you truly feel without judgement. In a word, the whole pressure and social stigma angle is bollox.
wakka12 wrote: » 2100 spoiled votes already..christ..how can so many people go wrong drawing an X inside a box
_Dara_ wrote: » Taking in those southern towns, Donegal seems to have gone yes but of course it won’t be recorded that way.
CruelCoin wrote: » Irleand doesn't exist in a bubble. I don't see this evil preggo cartel manifesting itself anywhere else in the EU.
Amalgam wrote: » If only your Mother would have had the luxury of choice (and the gift of hindsight) back then, this thread would be shorter, if nothing else..
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » the crying and outbursts by the no brigade has made for some hilarious reading and cannot mask the anger and seething they are having. Magnificent.
Omackeral wrote: » I'd say there were a lot of thicks putting down ticks.
wakka12 wrote: » Im very shocked by how many more people seemingly voted yes for this than the marriage referendum, in some counties at least. I thought for sure the number of yes voters would be at most the same number who voted yes in the marriage referendum. What explanation could there be for this?
blueser wrote: » I'll ask again, seeing as you didn't answer me the first time around. Who are you to call for people to be excommunicated?
neonsofa wrote: » Ticks are counted once it's a clear unambiguous indication afaik.