AtomicHorror wrote: » I haven't got out yet- there was talk of some groups intending to have a presence near the stations as if to check IDs. Anyone seen anything like that happening? I get there's some flag waving happening near some stations but I guess that's inevitable.
Dole Scrounging Vegan Crossfitter wrote: » Can't, unfortunately
DickSwiveller wrote: » Passed some young ones near the polling station with a Yes banner. Would they ever give it a ****in rest.
Billy86 wrote: » A reminder, whether you are voting YES or NO - do not wear any clothing, badges or other paraphernalia about your choice as this is not allowed in polling stations and could impact your ability to vote. I've had to mention it to a number of people on FB in the last 24 hours all excited about getting their "yes" or "no" gear on to go down to vote so figure it's worth saying here!
whisky_galore wrote: » Can't happen within 50m of a polling station, beyond that they can wave whatever they like.
Cantona's Collars wrote: » Groups supporting either side aren't allowed near polling stations,all paraphernalia has to be removed too. There's a 100 metre exclusion zone around polling stations. Anyone campaigning within that zone is breaking the law.
Billy86 wrote: » A reminder, whether you are voting YES or NO - do not wear any clothing, badges or other paraphernalia about your choice as this is not allowed in polling stations and could impact your ability to vote.
AtomicHorror wrote: » Yep, this I know. I'm asking if there's been shenaningans.
AtomicHorror wrote: » Why can't I wear clothing to the polling station? Who will mind my clothes if I remove them?
Larbre34 wrote: » Id be surprised if that happened, thats basic stuff for the staff, ID is perfectly sufficient. But if it did, ring the local returning officer and tell them this is happening. As someone who supervised polling stations for 15 years on and off, I can tell you denying someones vote without going to every length to establish their identity is the most serious thing that could happen. The presiding officer at the station could be personally liable in Court.
_Dara_ wrote: » Hope not. Divorce passed by only 9000 votes.
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » a poll in an echo chamber!
AtomicHorror wrote: Yep, this I know. I'm asking if there's been shenaningans.
uptherebels wrote: » Being in the minority doesn't make it an echo chamber.
Hitman3000 wrote: » LoveBothDrogheda had a callout for volunteers to act as security and check for ID's at polling stations. The tweet was deleted but not before being report to the Gaurds multiple times. I have a screenshot of the tweet but can't post it here.
DickSwiveller wrote: » Ah come on now
Mavis Some Insignia wrote: » Childish reply from someone who has been complaining about the 'dishonesty' and 'lies' of the No campaigners. It seems that you apply one rule to yourself, and another to those you don't agree with.
Billy86 wrote: » Currently 81% yes (which I voted for) from 552 votes. Granted AH will have a higher yes count that Ireland generally, though if I recall with SSM in 2015 it was about 10% in the difference.
Song_Lyric_Guy wrote: » "Yes, yes, yes, oh, yes Oh no, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes Oh, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes Oh...Yes, yes..." - Morrissey
circadian wrote: My suspicion is that it's a parody account. It has to be, unless they've gone full Willie Frazer.
Blazer wrote: » they're a shower of nutcases.They weren't long backing down after it.