Pelvis wrote: I'd be leaving, but I wouldn't tell them that until the day before you go off on holiday.
RedXIV wrote: » I think the key thing here is the fact that working in IT, especially if based near Dublin, there are tons of jobs out there, and coupled with the fact that it's a pain to train someone else up, that should work in your favour. But to be honest, rather than trying to work it out with the current bosses, I'd be looking at moving. Maybe it's a case of being lucky but in the last few jobs I've been in, I've felt appreciated which is important to me. If I couldn't get some sense of give and take with management, I'd be moving on immediately.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » OP has to give notice. But that month could include the holiday period so hand in notice roughly two weeks before going on holiday. There'll always be other jobs but life's too short to abandon a holiday costing thousands.
stateofflux wrote: whether to give notice or notice or not depends mostly on the need for a good reference and the likelihood of the action affecting your new employment -- the chances of ex employers following up with litigation are rare apart from in specific professions
Banterbus28 wrote: » OP clearly stated that colleagues have been treated differently. Also it is highly likely that the manager that originally verbally agreed the leave has done the "verbal agreement then put it in writing later" on multiple occasions. As such it is unfair treatment
AmberGold wrote: » I've skipped a fair bit of the replies as I'm getting annoyed reading about how you are being treated. Ok the facts as I see them are are: 1. Your request is not unreasonable 2. You gave them lots of notice 3. You received verbal approval 4. The precedent has been set, its allowed You've tried the softly softly approach so now the gloves are off. I'd draft a letter to HR & other senior bods copying them all and seeking confirmation of the leave. Time to put everything in writing, if it's declined I'd lodge a grievance. If that's overturned cite constructive dismissal and resign yourself to leaving, albeit under (hopefully) a compromise agreement. They pay you a parting gift for all this hassle. You can also stipulate in the compromise agreement that they have to give you a reference, some employers will only state the dates you worked there as a reference anyway. While you are resigned to leaving, don't leave, take it easy, become a clock watcher, drag it out & take your time finding the right job all while you have a formal complaint lodged. They won't be able to get rid of you at this point. Don't worry about references, I've worked with people who've been sacked from senior roles for all sorts of reasons (some dodgy) and are now working back in similar roles at other companies. Most of all don't stress and don't let it ruin your planned vacation, there are lots of jobs out there. I don't normally advise things like this but your managers' manager seems like a right hatchet and without a doubt this is unfair.
davo10 wrote: » How is this constructive dismissal and on what would base your demand for a good reference? While I think the op was hard done by, and this is making some people's blood boil, talking crap about suing for holiday costs and bringing a case for CD does not help the op. The fact remains, the op didn't have AL approval, that only comes after a written request is submitted, and AL is, legally, at the discretion of the employer.
Banterbus28 wrote: » The constructive dismissal theory in this situation is baseless. Yes there is, the precedent has been set. The OP is not being allowed the same leave as other employees. The OP has had verbal approval. There has been no disciplinary proceedings started.There doesn't need to be, the employer is acting unreasonably. There's no indication management are trying to make OP leave the company.As above, these cases are never clear-cut. The course of action above really only applies if OP wants to leave.
hots wrote: » Why only after a written request?
davo10 wrote: » In the op, he states that boss told him he had to submit the "usual" request form to be signed for time off. Op appears to have booked the holiday before submitting the form.
Galadriel wrote: » davo10 wrote: » In the op, he states that boss told him he had to submit the "usual" request form to be signed for time off. Op appears to have booked the holiday before submitting the form. But wasn't the OP told that he could take the holidays and to submit the form nearer the time?
Galadriel wrote: » But wasn't the OP told that he could take the holidays and to submit the form nearer the time?
Steven Seagal wrote: » Thanks for all the feedback, I was asked to attend a meeting at 3 today with both managers and explained my reasoning. I mentioned that I had communicated to my initial manager verbally when I was planning to take off and that I would put it in writing once we hit the summer perod for PTO requests. I also reiterated that another employee had taken a longer period off before Christmas, the US manager said that was a management mistake approving it and wouldnt happen again, so I told them I would have no option but to leave as I wasn’t not going to take the holiday. The US mananger immediately ended the meeting and scheduled another meeting next week with HR. My immediate manager was confused and told me to rethink leaving.
splinter65 wrote: » From citizens information : An employee who has worked for at least 8 months is entitled to an unbroken period of 2 weeks' annual leave.
Steven Seagal wrote: » My immediate manager was confused and told me to rethink leaving.
Eoghan_2 wrote: » Well OP how did the follow up meeting with HR go?