The Crowman wrote: » What the hell is the deal with angel therapy? It seems to be something that sprang up fairly recently and its always women who follow it.
anewme wrote: » Another thread generalising about women. I know more women think it’s rubbish than believe in it.
Hector Savage wrote: » But of the set of all people that believe in it , the vast majority seem to be women - correct ? It's an interesting thing ...
anewme wrote: » You’d really have to quote official statistics on that to be correct. Are there CSO stats or is it a question in the census? Where are you getting that information from go back up your facts. Otherwise it’s just conjecture.
PrettyBoy wrote: » This has crossed my mind too - my ex went to see one with her friends a few years back and an aunt of mine went around the same time too. They're all female and they all said the same thing when I questioned them about it: "She told me things about so-and-so that no one else would know". It's as if the bint claiming to be a psychic tells them when they're leaving to repeat that sentence when anyone questions them about it. Honestly, it's disappointing when your relatively intelligent girlfriend tells you in all seriousness that she paid a psychic €60 to tell her things she already knew. Scam artists (psychics in this case) have always been around and they will stay around as long as there are stupid, gullible women to prey on.
anewme wrote: » I had no idea what’s bint is so I looked it up. British Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. 1. a contemptuous term used to refer to a woman or girl. Origin of bint. I’m also no expert of psychics, but a quick search tells me that they are not all women.. Clearly your “relatively intelligent” girlfriend is well matched to yourself.
PrettyBoy wrote: » I saw this coming :rolleyes: Read the post again. I wasn't referring to all psychics as bints - just the one my ex visited. If it was a male psychic she saw then I'd have used a different term to refer to him. Relax
anewme wrote: » There’s something off if people are quoting a “Halloween poll “ as official research. I’m talking about real stats not Facebook trivia. Are these real stats or more horse ****.
Pugzilla wrote: » Gallup is one of the world's largest polling companies, http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx. BMG Research is legit, http://www.bmgresearch.co.uk/. You ask for sources and then reject them without even reading them.
anewme wrote: » But did you also not reference “stupid guillible women”? So no men go to psychics? funny how your girlfriend in the last post is now your ex, maybe the “bint” predicted your misogyny, if so so it was really 60 well spent.
jacksie66 wrote: » Physics are bollox conpeople who feed on the unfortunate and desperate. They're thieves masquerading as fortune tellers. Should be outlawed.
jacksie66 wrote: » Einstein didn't tell people that their dead aunt was standing beside them..
anewme wrote: » Nope I’m well aware of Gallup and that’s why I’m saying is not official. It’s not official proved research. If you are seriously trying to push the BMG research on a Halloween poll, it’s a bit of skit and nothing official, no one would make a decision based on that. I’ve asked for official stats, but you can’t give any, wonder why.
PrettyBoy wrote: » Fucking hell, relax If you believe in psychics then you're stupid and gullible. The majority of psychic customers are female. The minority of psychic customers are men. They're all equally stupid and gullible. Happy now? Well, you're on Boards arguing with everyone about how offended you are, so I guess not.