nevan wrote: » The running group that trains on the grass track in Trinity is TTRacers. They train there Tuesday and Thursday lunchtime in summer and in Ringsend in winter. It looks like a nice club. I’ve often seen a fairly pacey group of about 10 doing laps in the summer. I presume it’s them. They have a website but I cannot tell you the address. It’s cheap to join them, €40 a year and about €15 extra for using the Trinity track. I doubt that they have exclusive use of it though. I think anyone can go and run on it in season. This year the grass was bad on the track and it delayed opening. It usually opens in the middle of April. I asked a groundskeeper last month and he said that it would be open May 15th this year. It closes for running in November.
average_runner wrote: » If we got to November I be delighted, usually due to the weather its september
Nialler73 wrote: » Thanks for the info Nevan
nevan wrote: » I had a peek today at 1 and there were runners of all styles doing laps today. Offficially open!
cullenswood wrote: » GPS would find it very hard to be accurate over a running track given the short distance involved and the fact you are running in a circle.
Chivito550 wrote: » I’d be amazed if that track was bang on 400m to be honest. Popped down today on my lunch to have a look at it and to sit out in the sun. It looks great. Very impressed at how short they’ve kept the grass. Will definitely do a few sessions on it at lunchtime over the summer.
average_runner wrote: » Yeah its long. My watch was measuring around 1.05k per lap. But that's ok, it serves its purpose for me. They cut it three times a week for the cricket
Murph_D wrote: » 1.05? Really? Have you figured out why?:rolleyes:
Murph_D wrote: » So the track is long by 605m then? :pac:
average_runner wrote: » I meant per km lap. That was the intervals i was doing If you read it correctly i said 1.05k lap.
benjamin d wrote: » If you wrote it correctly there wouldn't be confusion. Talking about the length of a looped track of course people will take a lap to mean, well, a lap of the track.
average_runner wrote: » I put a k beside the lap distance. Maybe some people like to troll
Murph_D wrote: » Ok so your watch ‘measured’ the track at 420m then based on your 1.05k ‘lap’. If it’s long, it’s hardly that much off. And of course your watch measurement is not relevant. If your rep time was a bit slower than usual, much more likely to be the slow grass surface.
average_runner wrote: » I never gave out about it being off. Someone posted a comment saying they doubt it was dead on. I already said it didnt matter to me as it serves its purpose. And track isnt 420m. Its was a combine total of 5 meters over give or take after 2.5 laps.
Murph_D wrote: » Who said you gave out? You might want to check your sums though! Anyways just having a bit of fun. Never mind.
NeedsTraining wrote: » Apologies if this has already been asked and answered (I have read the thread and can't see it). Do you have to be a member to use this track or do people just float in for a few laps? Cheers, NT,