Lithium93_ wrote: » So possibly looking at 6 hours of TV a week if Smackdown goes to 3 hours, 7 hours a week if you include NXT. Then PPV week, that's 11 hours. Bloody overkill. Leave it as is.
Pentecost wrote: » You usually miss feck all if you don’t watch some (or all) of the weekly content in fairness. Even if you only have limited engagement with WWE on social media you’ll be up to speed and can search out anything that’s particularly interesting, if they aren’t plugging the shi* out of it online already.
cliggg wrote: » I agree, Raw & Smackdown are much more enjoyable when you don't actually watch them! Just look at reviews the next day and check out any good stuff. I don't know why so many fans keep watching these shows every week only to keep giving out about them. They already know they're sh*t so why put themselves through it?
Lithium93_ wrote: » Least we'll always get SlickRic's nail on head takes every week..
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » I hope Corgan and co put the NWA World Heavyweight on Cody Rhodes in the upcoming bout. Would mean so much to that family. Cody carrying on the mantle of his Dad. The Official Heavyweight Pro Wrestling Champ of the World.
Bounty Hunter wrote: » Random thought, the MITB matches are cross brand so the contract inside said briefcase should be to cash in on either the WWE or Universal champion (or womens champs). Obviously contracts can be written so that it would not be an issue but it'd open up a whole lot of booking possibilities. Just looking at the Irish ones Finn Balor cashes in on Smackdowns AJ Styles (while the club look on) for example Becky Lynch cashes in on Ronda and wins via armbar! to (potentially turn heel) and kickstart the horsewoman feud
Lithium93_ wrote: » One thing I love about the pro-wrestling forum, and Good Brothers & Sister (Hi Liz) who inhabit it, compared to another forum I frequent, it's nowhere near as toxic as the other forum is. Sure there'll be heated disagreements here from time to time, with Mods chipping in sometimes, but not nearly as frequently. There's a United (pardon the pun) camaraderie here compared to the other forum, where modding I'm sure is the equivalent to pulling your hair out. Whereas the PW mods, it's probably like Tahiti for them...
beakerjoe wrote: » **** YOU, YOU BLEEDING **** Come Lith, lets start a fight feud and give BH something to do.
gerrybbadd wrote: » Lets keep it kayfabe brother
beakerjoe wrote: » **** YOU, YOU BLEEDING **** Come Lith, lets start a fight and give BH something to do.
Monokne wrote: » I don't know about characterising the NWA title as the official heavyweight pro wrestling champion of the world in 2018 mind you. That's quite a stretch! Getting the nod from 5 of the 9 most powerful wrestling promoters in North America in the 70's and 80's really meant something. Getting the nod from a money mark in his vanity project doesn't seem quite so meaningful. All of that said, I am sure they could present it well on their youtube shows and put together some nice pieces on it.
briany wrote: » The NWA may be a vestige of times past and pretty insignificant in real terms, but it's still the closest thing that professional wrestling has to a governing body like you'd see in legitimate sport. That's how it styles itself. WWE doesn't claim to be this, and their top belts aren't even described as world championships anymore. And as the governing body, it naturally has a world championship. And, to be fair, the champ does go around the world, wrestling those deemed able and eligible, so there is a feeling with the belt that it could be won by someone from anywhere in any place. Although a relatively obscure title and not necessarily contested by the creme de la creme, this makes it still the closest thing to a true world championship in wrestling.