Gulliver wrote: » I don't care whether it's the Yes or No side doing this, it is vandalism pure and simple:https://www.oceanfm.ie/2018/05/17/no-sign-appears-on-ben-bulben-in-county-sligo/ If I was to put up a "Yellow" sign during the Purple/Yellow snack debate, more than likely I'd be in trouble for damaging a Special Area of Conservation. However this seems to be OK?
zom wrote: » False news and you're reported. Unless you show me some REAL "NO" sign on Benbulben - it should be pretty easy ??
miamee wrote: » I hope that's only paper or something else easily removed. This is a part of the country that myself and OH love to visit and have been twice over the past few weeks. That is an obscenity on an otherwise stunningly beautiful view.
HeidiHeidi wrote: That looks like something draped on the mountainside rather than actually gouged into it?
miamee wrote: . What a waste of time and effort. I hope that's only paper or something else easily removed. This is a part of the country that myself and OH love to visit and have been twice over the past few weeks. That is an obscenity on an otherwise stunningly beautiful view.
Hurrache wrote: Slabs of some sort I believe.
mcgiggles wrote: » As per the ocean fm link its plastic sheeting!
HeidiHeidi wrote: That article has been updated since the link was posted!
mcgiggles wrote: » Ahhhh that makes more sense! I was like guys its right there haha
miamee wrote: » Here you go: https://twitter.com/N_Five_One_B_U/status/997019807261319168 Story in The Journal here. What a waste of time and effort. I hope that's only paper or something else easily removed. This is a part of the country that myself and OH love to visit and have been twice over the past few weeks. That is an obscenity on an otherwise stunningly beautiful view.
miamee wrote: » If you'd read the article(s), the first image was taken when the people responsible were in the process of erecting the sign. This is why there is an 'N' but no 'O' yet. The second photo was taken when they were finished erecting the sign. I didn't take either of the photos, they are not my photos.
Dr Turk Turkelton wrote: » Wildcard: pink snack.
zom wrote: » I thought for a moment it was illegal action and vandalism rather than campaigning
Hurrache wrote: » Being for campaigning purposes does not negate the fact it could be illegal and vandalism.
Gulliver wrote: » The finished sign will say NO to Pink Snack
scotchy wrote: » The sheeting was put up by young men while the women made sandwiches, according to the spokesman on Newstalk:) .
Simona1986 wrote: I wouldn't say they've done the no campaign any favours with that comment
hjr wrote: » It was going to be: no no, no no no no, no no no no, no no there's no limit but there didn't have enough space....